jopmala
02 August 2014, 05:50 AM
Namaste
some say krishna is brahman some say krishna is not brahman but iswara some say krishna is supervised by vishnu or Narayana some say krishna is avatara of vishnu some say krishna is associated with maya. why so much confusion ? krishna who is a son of vasudev and devaki and who takes part in kurukshetra war and helped panadava to win who narrates ' srimad bhagavat gita' to arjun has given enough evidence of him i.e. who he is ,why he is here etc etc in bhagavat gita. does people have no faith in bhagavat gita that they are studying other gitas leaving aside BG ?
To me krishna is supreme. he is having form also formless ( as his wishes) he is having attributes and also attribute less ( as he wishes). he is almighty we can not question his authority we can not question how he be everywhere at a time. maya is said to be brahman himself but krishna is above maya that is evident from BG
some say krishna is brahman some say krishna is not brahman but iswara some say krishna is supervised by vishnu or Narayana some say krishna is avatara of vishnu some say krishna is associated with maya. why so much confusion ? krishna who is a son of vasudev and devaki and who takes part in kurukshetra war and helped panadava to win who narrates ' srimad bhagavat gita' to arjun has given enough evidence of him i.e. who he is ,why he is here etc etc in bhagavat gita. does people have no faith in bhagavat gita that they are studying other gitas leaving aside BG ?
To me krishna is supreme. he is having form also formless ( as his wishes) he is having attributes and also attribute less ( as he wishes). he is almighty we can not question his authority we can not question how he be everywhere at a time. maya is said to be brahman himself but krishna is above maya that is evident from BG