PDA

View Full Version : The British Raj and their conjuring of the AIT.



Khadgar
11 September 2007, 06:07 PM
The proper theory, and the theory that has much more evidence for it is AMT. Aryan Migration Theory, occurred well over 5000+ years ago and speaks of the Aryan tribes that slowly and peacefully migrated into the SubContinent and intermingled with the inhabitants there; the first of which being the Indus Valley.

The British Raj of course so grossly screwed up the details. They tried to make it seem like there was an invasion when in reality there was none. The Aryan Invasion Theory they called it [AIT], and instead of 5000+ years ago, they only fathomed their theory to have taken place 3500 years ago.

What I want to know is was this gross fabricationon the part of the British accidental or intentional?

I'm leaning towards it being intentional. The Brits couldn't fathom a such a beautiful heritage that Eastern traditions shared. They made similar historical mistakes for the people of China, Japan, Tibet, Mongolia, Korea, etc., so it is natural that the SubContinent is no exception. I want to know if it was their plan all along to twist 'migration' into 'invasion' just so that they would have another leverage against the Indian people: so that they might continue to demean the subjugated people of the SubContinent.

Was this their purpose? Was it their intent to try and make the SubContinent look bad, thereby facilitating an easier means of conversion into Christianity?

Eastern Mind
11 September 2007, 08:20 PM
Re: the British raj interpretation of Indian history: I don't personally think it was intentional, although I'm open to the possibility. I think they were just very ethnocentric. Anything different was wrong, or inconceivable to them. There are many examples: slavery, extinction of native tribes in the west via purposely spreading smallpox (now that was intentional) But I don't give them the credit of intelligence to actually plan it all out. Lord mcAuley (sp) did express intention though. I think village mentality was prevalent even more back then than it is now. The rewriting or misinterpretation of history has been going on for a long time, and still is, in order to propulgate a certain point of view. What was then was then. this is now, and with recent movements against the AIT, I think it'll be tossed out completely by nearly everyone within 20 years or less.

Aum Namashivaya

saidevo
12 September 2007, 08:56 AM
Namaste Khadgar and EM.

The AIT has been proved to be a deliberate fabrication by the British during their rule in India for their vested interests that included subjugation of the natives by spreading disinformation about their revered scriptures, dividing the society in the name of castes and their Christian missionary work of conversion.

For the systematic British fabrication, check the following links to know these facts:

(31) Organized efforts of the British to destroy our culture and religion, and mutilate our history.
http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/31_organized_efforts.htm

(32) First effort of Jones (1784) and the secret planning.
http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/32_first_effort.htm

(33) Two more attempts of Jones to destroy the Divinity of Sanskrit language and to mutilate Bhartiya history.
http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/33_two_more.htm

(34) The fiction of Aryan invasion, introduction of English language, and the suppression of Sanskrit language.
http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/34_the_fiction_of.htm

(35) Max Müller. A paid employee, who translated the Rigved in a demeaning style. The hidden secrets of his life.
http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/35_max_muller.htm

(36) Major falsehoods as promoted by the British.
http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/36_major_falsehoods.htm

(37) Asiatic Researches group of people.
http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/37_asiatic_research.htm

(38) F. E. Pargiter (1852-1927).
http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/38_f_e_pargiter.htm

(39) How did the British fabricate and destroy the historic records of India and misguide the whole world?
http://www.encyclopediaofauthentichinduism.org/articles/39_how_did.htm

As to how the AIT is debunked, here are some links:
http://www.hinduwisdom.info/aryan_invasion_theory.htm

http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/ancient/aryan/aryan_link.html

As a result of systematic exposure of the British falsehood by the Indian and Western Indologists, BBC has withdrawn its article favouring the AIT in its Website.

Khadgar
12 September 2007, 06:40 PM
Namaste saidevo,

Wow... so it was intentional on the part of the British. That's pretty disturbing... Although, I guess I should have expected it...

Eastern Mind
12 September 2007, 08:46 PM
Saidevo... I withdraw all previous doubts, and benefit of doubt regarding 'intention' You obviously have researched it much more than I. Thanks for the service to understanding. I hope and pray they've changed enough to continue to allow the immigration of Hindus to Britain, and the new immigrants to live in relative harmony. Aum Namashivaya

Khadgar
17 September 2007, 12:06 AM
Saidevo... I withdraw all previous doubts, and benefit of doubt regarding 'intention' You obviously have researched it much more than I. Thanks for the service to understanding. I hope and pray they've changed enough to continue to allow the immigration of Hindus to Britain, and the new immigrants to live in relative harmony. Aum Namashivaya


Greetings EM,

I don't live in Britain, but I'm told that at the heart of the BNP [British National Party], lies an inherently racist agenda vying for power to root out minorities [which of course includes Hindu minorities as well]. It seems to me that they seem to be one of the more influential parties right now, and so I'm quite concerned about Britain's future immigration policies.