Adhvagat
19 November 2010, 06:25 PM
I found this on the web:
http://dasi.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/someone-wrote-this/
And then this reply:
http://dasi.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/dasi-replies/
At first let me state that I don't fully agree with Caitanya Das has presented, while I recognize most of the flaws he talks about ISKCON, my view is not the same as his.
About the reply, I find the tone very weird, disrespectful and narrow-minded.
Specially on point #21, the writer makes it look like ISKCON is the only place to find devotees, that is a lie.
On point #8, we can interpret that in order to disagree with ISKCON we need to base ourselves on a ISKCON approved source. Laughable.
For those that may be reading this and don't know me. I found Sanatana Dharma through ISKCON and Prabhupada's books. I'm forever greatful to the work done and deeply admire Prabhupada's view and how he broke into the west.
But ISKCON as an institution is flawed and does not contribute (to many) to spiritual advancement.
I know this can be an emotionally tiresome subject to discuss, but I present this trying to look beyond the agitation. My preliminary conclusion is... ISKCON is not Prabhupada, his books and philosophy are. Therefore my responsibility is not towards ISKCON and waste energy trying to repair someone else's wrong doing, but to better myself with the material I was presented and influence by example. The personal level supercedes the institutional level.
If someone can contribute with insights and opinions... I'm grateful!
Hari Om Tat Sat
http://dasi.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/someone-wrote-this/
And then this reply:
http://dasi.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/dasi-replies/
At first let me state that I don't fully agree with Caitanya Das has presented, while I recognize most of the flaws he talks about ISKCON, my view is not the same as his.
About the reply, I find the tone very weird, disrespectful and narrow-minded.
Specially on point #21, the writer makes it look like ISKCON is the only place to find devotees, that is a lie.
On point #8, we can interpret that in order to disagree with ISKCON we need to base ourselves on a ISKCON approved source. Laughable.
For those that may be reading this and don't know me. I found Sanatana Dharma through ISKCON and Prabhupada's books. I'm forever greatful to the work done and deeply admire Prabhupada's view and how he broke into the west.
But ISKCON as an institution is flawed and does not contribute (to many) to spiritual advancement.
I know this can be an emotionally tiresome subject to discuss, but I present this trying to look beyond the agitation. My preliminary conclusion is... ISKCON is not Prabhupada, his books and philosophy are. Therefore my responsibility is not towards ISKCON and waste energy trying to repair someone else's wrong doing, but to better myself with the material I was presented and influence by example. The personal level supercedes the institutional level.
If someone can contribute with insights and opinions... I'm grateful!
Hari Om Tat Sat