Wow, now I feel bad that my whole family eats at McDonald's here in the US (and my parents would be big time vegetarians even if we weren't Hindu). Granted, it's not like we eat there often. There's not much we can eat since it's mostly meat, so it's more of a once a month affair where someone stops by for pancakes or an ice cream cone. I sometimes grab a diet Coke, but that's about it. In India where no one slaughters cattle, it's easy to pick out the one business that in its home country is known for its hamburgers. But here in America virtually everyone eats and sells meat. Growing up Hindu and vegetarian over here, you get used to finding the one vegetarian thing at the steakhouse. If I were to boycott businesses that sell meat, I'd have to boycott almost everything. That's not practical, so I just recognize that I'm the minority here and can't expect everyone to accomodate me.
Now in India the situation is a bit different, because Hindus are the majority and everyone should accomodate us. But I'm guessing that this is what McDonald's is doing, since they aren't selling beef. If they were trying to lobby the government to legalize beef sales or otherwise undermine Hinduism I think we'd have a problem here. But if they are only, as Believer put it, filling needs that already exist, then what's the problem? If you guys want to ban something, go and ban Christian missionaries. Right off the top of my head, that's a problem that is both more dangerous to Hinduism and easier to solve (since you're not going after single corporation with lawyers and billions of American dollars). Or if you really want to do something to end a major theat to Hinduism, stop voting for corrupt politicians. Fighting McDonald's just seems like a whole lot of wasted effort.
Bookmarks