Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: Advaita Viewpoint On Spiritual Worlds.

  1. #21

    Re: Advaita Viewpoint On Spiritual Worlds.

    Namaste NayaSurya, it's a shame you dont post anymore, I was a longtime lurker before I decided to start posting, and read your posts, you seem like a wonderful person with a lot of knowledge to share.

    Glad to have you back though even for a little bit.

    I'm sorry to hear about the situation that happened with your father, and what he is going through in spirit. Light a White candle for him, and pray for him(or towards him) as much as you can.

    Yes those that are recently departed, depending on how spiritually aware they were in life, it's a process to evolve, and get out of the habit of shedding their previous identity. It is ignorance that keeps them. They need to become less attached to this realm.

    As for what you brought up "worshipping ghosts" that's also a reason I brought this thread up. I was under the mistakened impression due to how Advaita approaches reality, knowing that from that standpoint the demigods are all different manifestations of Brahman, rather as "individuals", that some can be under the dangerous assumptions that encountering negative spirits they too can be treated as a manifestation of "brahman". As I have seen for myself people fall into that trap.

    But right now I understand clearer the Advaitan stance.

    P.S.
    From what i can understand about the other thing (are we real are they real) above.

    People...souls have layers upon us.

    This lifetime, this me is a layer.

    Those spirits on my recording? Still utterly ignorant, they knew nothing more than they did at their death! This was quite a suprise to me, but it makes sense with Advaita.

    You see they are still in that "angry man" mode...still within that skin/layer and still playing out that drama in that personality.

    Each layer, becomes removed with sadhana...karma burnt...lots of lessons...lots of Mercy.

    Under these layers...Pure Beloved.

    The layers not only separate us from our True Selves, but from each other too.

    So that's my evolving understanding upon our existence...from what i have seen here.

    Which really and truly explains the vast ignorance and vile behaviour of those poor folks below us.

    May Beloved Have Mercy upon them.

    Hari om <3
    This makes sense, and thank you for sharing. May peace always follow you.

    Blessings.

  2. #22

    Re: Advaita Viewpoint On Spiritual Worlds.

    Quote Originally Posted by Indiaspirituality View Post
    Namaste,

    Spirits are all real. Shastras say there are 7 lokas and 14 bhuvans. Some above and some below earth. Mostly you can find it in Garuda Purana. May be other knowledgeable members can say something more and give importance.

    Spirits are true entities, but if you ask advaita standpoint, you will have to neglect them and do not give importance.

    Planes higher than bhu loka (pruthvi loka) are yonis higher than human race like that of devas.

    one can definitely communicate with them, but if you are asking from a standpoint of advaita or even dvaita, nothing except God should be given importance.

    I too have felt pressure on head, felt them and even saw them. I am talking of higher beings when I was Practising Pranic Healing. Some communicate during meditation, some during healing, etc. But traditional advaita do not give them importance

    In bhagavad Gita, Bhagavan Krushna in chapter 9 verse 25 says

    The worshippers of the gods go to them; to the manes go the ancestor-worshippers; to the deities who preside over the elements go their worshippers; but My devotees come to Me.

    source: English translation by Swami Sivananda
    http://202.3.77.102/acquia/?q=node/27

    so it is upto you whom you want to stay with. Sure these things spirits, good and bad, divine, devil, etc exists and so does heaven and hell

    The more you take interest in them, the more you will come close in them and be influenced in them.

    But then what is your purpose of life? the answer will show you the path.

    Aum
    IS
    Funny you bring that verse up, I just came across it recently as a matter of fact. I dont follow it as "coincidence" ;p

    Bhagavad-gītā s 9.25: Those who worship the demigods will take birth among the demigods; those who worship the ancestors go to the ancestors; those who worship ghosts and spirits will take birth among such beings; and those who worship Me will live with Me.

    This verse in particular has really went through to me.

    I do worship Demigods which are similar to that of the devas in Hinduism, in the carribean we have our own versions of those deitys(I personally believe them to be the same beings) as they too are extensions/manifestations of the ONE God. So Some are anthropomorphic, some are personifications of a Natural Force or Element etc.


    Can I ask WHY it is so wrong to have a relationship with God, Advancing towards one's spiritual development, as well as being aware of these beings? Why cant I be with God, AND be with my Jinn Friend(see posts above) too in the next life?

    Anyone can answer this, please.

    Thank you India for your insight.

    Blessings.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    February 2008
    Location
    Green Hill in KY USA
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,186
    Rep Power
    2563

    Re: Advaita Viewpoint On Spiritual Worlds.

    I am sorry to hear about your adventure, but also i feel it must have been meant to be for you to experience it. It was a blessing of sorts to have her near?

    I have always been surrounded by folks on the other side. Caring for dying folks for ages gives me probably more than most. But not until 2001 when my Mother died did the things get very different.

    A higher sort of Being was coming through...and i believe it was a lesson of this life time and my own karma to remember my previous life and miss this One special, very Beloved Being...most of all.

    He's higher, and never breaks the rules. So i may never see Him here, i wish i would.

    I don't see anything wrong with you going to your friend if you wish it when your time ends here, because God...is inside your friend too.

    But, i will say, I feel that going to these other places to be with your friend will not be a forever place. The only forever place is being dissolved, at least that is what everyone always says.

    I think this makes sense as the rest of our options would be involving a desire for more time to experience?

    I say, as always....Follow your Beloved Heart.

    Hari Om<3

  4. #24
    Join Date
    June 2012
    Location
    Mumbai
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,210
    Rep Power
    1365

    Re: Advaita Viewpoint On Spiritual Worlds.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spirit Seeker View Post
    Funny you bring that verse up, I just came across it recently as a matter of fact. I dont follow it as "coincidence" ;p

    Bhagavad-gītā s 9.25: Those who worship the demigods will take birth among the demigods; those who worship the ancestors go to the ancestors; those who worship ghosts and spirits will take birth among such beings; and those who worship Me will live with Me.

    This verse in particular has really went through to me.

    I do worship Demigods which are similar to that of the devas in Hinduism, in the carribean we have our own versions of those deitys(I personally believe them to be the same beings) as they too are extensions/manifestations of the ONE God. So Some are anthropomorphic, some are personifications of a Natural Force or Element etc.


    Can I ask WHY it is so wrong to have a relationship with God, Advancing towards one's spiritual development, as well as being aware of these beings? Why cant I be with God, AND be with my Jinn Friend(see posts above) too in the next life?

    Anyone can answer this, please.

    Thank you India for your insight.

    Blessings.
    Namaste,

    There is nothing wrong in being connected with demi-gods. you can be even connected with God. What Gita says cannot be questioned, so it is true, as when you meditate on something or stay with someone, you acquire their Gunas.

    Rishis did some yagnas for devas (demi-gods), worshipped them or meditated upon them for a boon. What I was saying is from Advaita POV. Advaita does not give importance to them, IF Your one and only GOAL is SELF REALIZATION.

    I do not say did not believe or deny their existence. I say, do not give importance. For spiritual progress you may find someone denying anything that you see, as it all comes within Maya, including higher worlds. Your mind remains active and you need to take care of your own body (physical or subtle) to stay in touch. Advaita says us to go beyond maya and it's 3 gunas.

    Aum
    IS
    Only God Is Truth, Everything Else Is Illusion - Ramakrishna
    Total Surrender of Ego to SELF is Real Bhakti - Ramana Maharshi

    Silence is the study of the scruptures. Meditation is the continuous thinking of Brahman which is to be meditated upon. The complete negation of both by knowledge is the vision of truth – sadAcAra-14 of Adi SankarAcArya

    namah SivAya vishnurUpAya viShNave SivarUpiNe, MBh, vanaparva, 3.39.76

    Sanskrit Dict | MW Dict | Gita Super Site | Hindu Dharma

  5. #25

    Re: Advaita Viewpoint On Spiritual Worlds.

    I am sorry to hear about your adventure, but also i feel it must have been meant to be for you to experience it. It was a blessing of sorts to have her near?
    Namaste NayaSurya,

    I would say she was a Blessing and a Curse. People often wonder why I would still consider her a friend and miss her after some of the problems she's caused me, but I wouldnt expect anyone to really understand, if they didnt have the original experience or werent observers to the correlation of events that happened. I dont really carry a Narrow Minded Dualism as to the nature of these beings, they are hard to understand, their worlds are mysterious, but we being a part of each other through the attachment, I felt I acheived Higher levels of understanding, which started my spiritual journey for me, I saw things through her eyes as I experienced her, and she as well Experienced me seeing things through my eyes, The experience for her was beneficial for her to connect with a Human in such a Deep Manner, since most aren't sensitive to these beings.

    I believe it was probably meant to be also. For a Good portion of my life I was "On the fence" skeptical about God, The Spiritual Realitys etc. I Carried a Cognitive dissonasance and Just surrendered to the thought that "No matter what amazing anecdotes there would be, it is all futile, because there is always a counter argument for every metaphysical claim there is."

    I convinced myself I was incapable in accepting a god, or anything metaphysical in general. The only way I could have allowed myself to believe and accept was experiencing something metaphysical so the extraordinary to the point that it would be irrefutable for me to believe otherwise. The universe must have granted my wish, if such a random spirit took interest in me, and was "Up-Front" pushy, and all in my face about her existence. lol



    Quote Originally Posted by Indiaspirituality View Post
    Namaste,

    There is nothing wrong in being connected with demi-gods. you can be even connected with God. What Gita says cannot be questioned, so it is true, as when you meditate on something or stay with someone, you acquire their Gunas.

    Rishis did some yagnas for devas (demi-gods), worshipped them or meditated upon them for a boon. What I was saying is from Advaita POV. Advaita does not give importance to them, IF Your one and only GOAL is SELF REALIZATION.

    I do not say did not believe or deny their existence. I say, do not give importance. For spiritual progress you may find someone denying anything that you see, as it all comes within Maya, including higher worlds. Your mind remains active and you need to take care of your own body (physical or subtle) to stay in touch. Advaita says us to go beyond maya and it's 3 gunas.

    Aum
    IS
    Namaste India,

    Oh no, dont take it the wrong way, You and Devotee helped me understand Advaita, so I now have a better grasp then I did before. I wasnt implicating that you dont acknowledge these beings.

    What is Gunas?

    I forgot to paste the commentary of that verse, I found off a website.

    http://vedabase.net/bg/9/25/

    PURPORT

    "If one has any desire to go to the moon, the sun or any other planet, one can attain the desired destination by following specific Vedic principles recommended for that purpose, such as the process technically known as darśa-paurṇamāsī. These are vividly described in the fruitive activities portion of the Vedas, which recommends a specific worship of demigods situated on different heavenly planets. Similarly, one can attain the Pitā planets by performing a specific yaja. Similarly, one can go to many ghostly planets and become a Yakṣa, Rakṣa or Piśāca. Piśāca worship is called "black arts" or "black magic." There are many men who practice this black art, and they think that it is spiritualism, but such activities are completely materialistic. Similarly, a pure devotee, who worships the Supreme Personality of Godhead only, achieves the planets of Vaikuṇṭha and Kṛṣṇaloka without a doubt. It is very easy to understand through this important verse that if by simply worshiping the demigods one can achieve the heavenly planets, or by worshiping the Pitās achieve the Pitā planets, or by practicing the black arts achieve the ghostly planets, why can the pure devotee not achieve the planet of Kṛṣṇa or Viṣṇu? Unfortunately many people have no information of these sublime planets where Kṛṣṇa and Viṣṇu live, and because they do not know of them they fall down. Even the impersonalists fall down from the brahmajyoti. The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is therefore distributing sublime information to the entire human society to the effect that by simply chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra one can become perfect in this life and go back home, back to Godhead."


    Referring to my question, It seems people who practice the things I do, they refer to it as "Black Magick" or "Spiritual Materialism." I'm so used to having my cultural practices called "Black Magick" by uninformed outsiders. I highly respect the Hindu Religion and It's teachings, but I'm not sure what to think of that commentary on that verse, if In fact many practicing hindu's do share that same opinion or perception.

    I can understand some of where the author is coming from. He obviously believes that working with spirits is a materially-focused path. Basically, I believe that it CAN be, but it doesn't have to be. If you are working with spirits in order to reach higher states of consciousness/energy, then I don't really see how that is materialism. Especially if you have sacrificed a lot of your material life, and stopped doing a lot of physical-based things in order to reach greater heights in spirituality. If someone abuses their powers or uses spirits for selfish reasons and gains, or to harm others, then yes I would consider that "Black Arts" or "Material Spirituality". Either way I think such practices are completely separate from however way one is seeking God. Which is why I asked, what is wrong with it, and how does it interfere with spiritual development or Seeking God? Unless I am missing something.

    Thank you again.

  6. #26

    Re: Advaita Viewpoint On Spiritual Worlds.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spirit Seeker View Post
    ... Either way I think such practices are completely separate from however way one is seeking God. Which is why I asked, what is wrong with it, and how does it interfere with spiritual development or Seeking God? Unless I am missing something.

    Thank you again.
    What you are missing is the fact that there exist countless different views all under one label of Hinduism - which is obviously highly misleading to many people. I suppose, it is inevitable that each Hindu believes his own viewpoint is the definitive, authoritative Hindu position.

    The Gita (or for that matter, any other text) is not the final authority for all Hindus - again a point missed by many people, who are accustomed to seeing religion as having a central holy scripture. Hinduism does not conform to this model and I believe, understanding this will answer your questions.
    http://lokayata.info
    http://shivsomashekhar.wordpress.com/category/history/

  7. #27
    Join Date
    June 2012
    Location
    Mumbai
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,210
    Rep Power
    1365

    Re: Advaita Viewpoint On Spiritual Worlds.

    Namaste India,

    Oh no, dont take it the wrong way, You and Devotee helped me understand Advaita, so I now have a better grasp then I did before. I wasnt implicating that you dont acknowledge these beings.

    What is Gunas?

    I forgot to paste the commentary of that verse, I found off a website.

    http://vedabase.net/bg/9/25/

    PURPORT

    "If one has any desire to go to the moon, the sun or any other planet, one can attain the desired destination by following specific Vedic principles recommended for that purpose, such as the process technically known as darśa-paurṇamāsī. These are vividly described in the fruitive activities portion of the Vedas, which recommends a specific worship of demigods situated on different heavenly planets. Similarly, one can attain the Pitā planets by performing a specific yaja. Similarly, one can go to many ghostly planets and become a Yakṣa, Rakṣa or Piśāca. Piśāca worship is called "black arts" or "black magic." There are many men who practice this black art, and they think that it is spiritualism, but such activities are completely materialistic. Similarly, a pure devotee, who worships the Supreme Personality of Godhead only, achieves the planets of Vaikuṇṭha and Kṛṣṇaloka without a doubt. It is very easy to understand through this important verse that if by simply worshiping the demigods one can achieve the heavenly planets, or by worshiping the Pitās achieve the Pitā planets, or by practicing the black arts achieve the ghostly planets, why can the pure devotee not achieve the planet of Kṛṣṇa or Viṣṇu? Unfortunately many people have no information of these sublime planets where Kṛṣṇa and Viṣṇu live, and because they do not know of them they fall down. Even the impersonalists fall down from the brahmajyoti. The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is therefore distributing sublime information to the entire human society to the effect that by simply chanting the Hare Kṛṣṇa mantra one can become perfect in this life and go back home, back to Godhead."


    Referring to my question, It seems people who practice the things I do, they refer to it as "Black Magick" or "Spiritual Materialism." I'm so used to having my cultural practices called "Black Magick" by uninformed outsiders. I highly respect the Hindu Religion and It's teachings, but I'm not sure what to think of that commentary on that verse, if In fact many practicing hindu's do share that same opinion or perception.

    I can understand some of where the author is coming from. He obviously believes that working with spirits is a materially-focused path. Basically, I believe that it CAN be, but it doesn't have to be. If you are working with spirits in order to reach higher states of consciousness/energy, then I don't really see how that is materialism. Especially if you have sacrificed a lot of your material life, and stopped doing a lot of physical-based things in order to reach greater heights in spirituality. If someone abuses their powers or uses spirits for selfish reasons and gains, or to harm others, then yes I would consider that "Black Arts" or "Material Spirituality". Either way I think such practices are completely separate from however way one is seeking God. Which is why I asked, what is wrong with it, and how does it interfere with spiritual development or Seeking God? Unless I am missing something.

    Thank you again.
    Namaste,

    I am not taking is wrongly. What I am saying is that from Advaita POV, the practices like you mention like spirit contact are not advisable. Why? The reason is that Advaita means non-duality.

    So if you are in contact with someone from other world, no matter how good the intention may be, you still are doing karma, precisely sakam karma. You wish to do good of world. Advaita says that all 3 gunas - sattva, rajas and tamas are doshas.

    So that would mean that even a noble intention has also to be quit, as everything is inside maya. Unlike other paths or belief systems, Advaita considers every action to be dropped. This is because you are none of these. All you have to do is realize your true nature - Brahman. For that you will have to rise above maya. One cannot live without work, so only do work that is necessary. But later on when one is mature, you need physically or mentally or energetically serve your country or world. Even helping others is a desire. Vivek Chudamani says, destruction of desires is nothing but liberation.

    All you do depends upon your goal

    If your only goal is self realization, then avoid the contacts with higher world
    IF your intention is to serve humanity, there are many new-age systems connected with energy which do the same.


    But the question is - do you get self realization by passing through it? My answer is - very very difficult. As you progress, mind becomes pure. So if you have only one desire - to serve, then mind grasps it so strongly that when time comes to quit that desire, yo wont be able to do it, as you have given too much importance and have spend years. Trust me, I have passed through these phase. It took so much time to become neutral and neglect that I now wish I should have never practiced it. But while practicing it, I was not feeling that I am doing wrong and that everything is right. But this is the case only if you wish to walk the spiritual path the advaita way. I do not know about other paths.

    Hope this helps.

    Aum
    Only God Is Truth, Everything Else Is Illusion - Ramakrishna
    Total Surrender of Ego to SELF is Real Bhakti - Ramana Maharshi

    Silence is the study of the scruptures. Meditation is the continuous thinking of Brahman which is to be meditated upon. The complete negation of both by knowledge is the vision of truth – sadAcAra-14 of Adi SankarAcArya

    namah SivAya vishnurUpAya viShNave SivarUpiNe, MBh, vanaparva, 3.39.76

    Sanskrit Dict | MW Dict | Gita Super Site | Hindu Dharma

  8. #28

    Re: Advaita Viewpoint On Spiritual Worlds.

    Quote Originally Posted by devotee View Post
    Namaste Spirit Seeker,

    Advaita is a difficult subject to understand and this has to be kept in mind before trying to give one's own explanation on "What Advaita should be". I will give you some examples :

    a) You take a piece of diamond and a piece of iron. Are they two or same ? Diamond is diamond and iron is iron. So, at this level, these are certainly two things. Now let's go at a level where you can't find a difference between a particle and a wave ... i.e. let's go at lowest of sub-atomic level ... even below quarks and anti-quarks, if possible. It has been proved that matter can be converted into energy. As all types of energies are basically the same, we can safely conclude that at the lowest level, all matter whether Iron or diamond must have the same essence from which it should be made up of. Otherwise too, if go reverse i.e. converting energy into matter, theoretically it is possible to create any matter from the same energy. Even if stop at energy and say that it is the substratum of everything around us ... we end up seeing everything in this world as essentially the same energy.

    So, though the reality is that everything is Consciousness ... in absence of any valid instrument to prove it, we agree to the assertion that "Everything is nothing but energy" and proceed with this. So, what do we get ?

    "All Matter and energy are essentially same thing."

    However, it doesn't mean that the distinction has disappeared at the gross level. Diamond, Iron and Energy have their own characteristics at the gross level.

    b) For understanding Advaita, the above example is barely sufficient due to its severe limitations as we are unable to deal with Consciousness directly. Advaita says that Everything is Consciousness. Consciousness is Brahman. Now, that said, it is not that Consciousness has partly converted into humans, partly into stones, partly into trees etc. No, the conversion has been Only apparently. What does it mean ?

    For understanding this let's first have a look on this invocation verse of IsAvAsya Upanishad :

    "Om purnam-adah purnam-idam purnaat purnam-udacyate. purnasya purnam-aadaaya, purnam-eva-avashishyate "

    ===> That is infinite, this is infinite; From That infinite this infinite comes. From That infinite, (when) this infinite is taken out; balance remains as infinite.

    "That" in the above verse is used for Brahman and "This" is used for this universe. So, the verse says that Brahman is limitless and from it is born this universe which again is limitless. After this Infinite Universe comes out from the Infinite Brahman, the Infinite Brahman remains.

    So, everything is Brahman and "Nothing" has really converted into anything else i.e. there was Brahman to begin with and Brahman alone remains at the end. How is it possible ? Are we able to understand what it says ? It is difficult. Why ? We are going to deal with how Consciousness behaves and we have hardly any idea of how consciousness acts. The verse says something which seems impossibility but this is only due of our lack of knowledge on how Consciousness behaves.

    c) The Dream analogy :

    By analysing our dreams, we can understand the above verse though it won't by what actually happens. However, our purpose will be served by analysing the Dream-phenomenon.

    In the phenomenon of dreaming :

    a) There is only One Consciousness i.e. of the Dreamer. There is no other consciousness taking part in the dreaming process.

    b) While dreaming many characters are created and a story line too is created which runs the dream. The various characters acting in the dream i.e. all the persons whether friends or foes, girls or boys, men or women, stones or pearls, tress or birds ... everything is creation of Dreamer's consciousness. There is no other material which changes into the characters of the dream and there is no other cause, so we can safely say that Dreamer is the material and efficient cause of the whole dream world.

    Please note here that every character in the dream acts on his/her/its own. The dreamer has its separate entity in the dream which may not be exactly as he really is and he or even the dreamer don't know how a dream character is going to behave the next moment (that shows that the actions of the dream characters are not pre-decided by the dreamer). There may be some characters created in the dream which could not be friends of the dreamer (so, creation can act against its own creator apparently) and yet those characters are created and act on their own. Anything cannot act on its own independently unless it has a consciousness of its own. Therefore, every character in the dream must have its own Consciousness otherwise their actions should have been known to the dreamer in advance who is the Consciousness behind the whole set of characters in the dream. But we all know that the dreamer doesn't how one dream character is going to do the next moment in the dream.

    Now, let's analyse the dream phenomenon :
    **********
    i) There can be no doubt that there is Actually only one Consciousness i.e. that of the Dreamer. There is no consciousness which is added to or subtracted from teh Dreamer's Consciousness i.e. before dream, during the dream, the Consciousness of the dreamer remains the same.

    However, though it was One Consciousness alone to begin with and one alone remained during the dreaming session and also after the dream ended, there were many separate consciousnesses perceived during the dream. This gives us an idea of unique characteristic of Consciousness i.e. Without being actually divided into many, one Consciousness can give rise to perception of many consciousness apparently. . This is called ChidAbhAsa (phenomenon of reflected consciousness) characteristic of Consciousness or Brahman.

    Now, armed with this knowledge, we can answer all your questions on Spiritual world :

    a)

    ===> You are right. However, from Absolute point of view, everything including you is just like a dream-character which has the Consciousness of the Dreamer as the substratum. The Spirt is as real as you are. At the Absolute level, both you and the spirit are unreal. Only Brahman exists.

    b)

    ===> True. Not because Brahman is formless Brahman is neither formless nor with form it is beyond all mental constructs. The Perceived Jeeva is Brahman in absolute sense and the perceiver i.e. you too are Brahman. This is possible due to special power of Consciousness to see multitude within itself (as in dreaming state) and still remaining the same. This unique power of Brahman is called MAyA. Brahman can be with this power and also without power i.e. this power can be manifest and also unmanifest. When this power is unmanifest i.e. lies within Brahman, it is Brahman's Absolute state which alone is the sole reality and is called the "Fourth State" of Brahman. When this power is manifest three entities apparently comes into being : God (the third state of Brahman), The Waking state (i.e. this manifest world), the Dreaming state or the Subtle world which is the world of all of us before birth and after death.

    You question is whether the spirit to whom you are talking is real or unreal and just a mental construct. In this question, you have assumed that "You are real". Now, that means (by taking that assumption) that you are speaking from the Waking state (Gross world state) and from that state you are real and also the spirit is real. If you say that "I am Brahman" and the "Spirit is Brahman" these statements are from the Absolute state. Both the statements are correct as long as you keep seeing from one state. However, you will be in serious difficulty to understand things when you mix up the phenomena of two different states. From the Absolute state, the spirit to whom you are interacting is a mental construct (of Brahman and not yours as an individual) but so you are. You cannot say : "I am real" and "the spirit to whom I am talking is unreal".

    OM

    This whole post was a refreshing read.

    Could you please tell me from where did you get this information?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Aarati a Spiritual perspective
    By Hiwaunis in forum Science and Religion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09 July 2010, 02:42 PM
  2. Tattvas
    By grames in forum Advaita
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 14 October 2009, 07:55 AM
  3. Some questions on HK
    By Yogkriya in forum Hare Krishna (ISKCON)
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06 August 2007, 02:03 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •