Re: Defining Hindu
Originally Posted by
MahaHrada
Accuse me of whatever you wish, but it is first of all my viewpoint, if western indologists agree with it so much the better, i have no qualms with the academia.
At least it is consistent with my attitude, while to cherry pick, and recommend to study smear attacks on indologists, written by a close disciple and public defender of a notorious neo hindu and sex-offender, Swami Nithyananda, Rajiv Malhotra, in support of your so called traditionalist viewpoint feels somehow inconsistent.
I can't help but notice, that when someone points out inconsistencies in your views, you tend to default back to crying foul about attacks other people made in other places, as if this is somehow relevant here. Can I take it as a given that you will not explain why you dislike Neo-Hindus being funded by Western interests, but approve of Western Indologists being funded by Western interests?
Philosoraptor
"Wise men speak because they have something to say. Fools speak because they have to say something." - Plato
Bookmarks