Originally Posted by
saswathy
Dear friend ,
When they are considered as mathematical points , where does the question of dominant trait arise .
RR: Trait/tendency: Movement! :-) I am sure you understood, but the active and enthusiastic mind never ceases to find questions bubbling up! That can be a tendency or a trait too <LOL> In the jyotish framework, aided by math and astronomy, whether it be apinda or sapinda, they all move! But which way they move, forward or backward is what we should focus on, lest there be confusion! Sometimes real, sometimes contrived...? ;-)
Secondly I always wonder about the placements of planets in divisional charts . Take for example Navamsa . The rasi is divided in to 9 parts and a planet is posted to that particular segment depending upon the degree position . So far so good . But when it comes to Rahu or kethu , logically speaking , it should be counted from backwards .Then WHY it is not posted like that . For that matter in all divisional charts , Rahu or kethu should be placed like that only .
RR: AH! another confusion perhaps? :-) The nine parts belong to the rasi and perhaps you would next want to take Sirshodayi, prishtodayi etc classification, I think for vargas, we can take the way the rasis rise daily and the sun as it progresses DIRECT from month to month? In the normal order in which rasis are arranged, along the cosmic circle - the zodiac! Perhaps you should rearrange in your experimentations the lay of navamshas according to whether a rasi rises from the head or tail or both ends...? ;-)
If this rule is applied in all divisional charts , a sea of difference comes in the result as far as the period of Rahu or kethu is concerned , especially the bhava is concerned .
To avoid this anamoly , I stopped counting Rahu and kethu for the calculation of dasa and anthardasas . I take only the seven planets .
RR: I really pity the plight of poor nodes and the rest of the baby of astrology that might next get chucked out with the bath-water!
May be I am wrong . I take Rahu and kethu as shadowy planets only and decide their result and significance with respect to their associates , including the dasa period .That is if Rahu is assiciated with jupiter and is in star of jupiter then ( according to my weird calculation to some) I give the dasa period of Rahu as 16 years and his attributes as those of Jupiter .Thus I take all those of Rahu's influencers .Sometimes I got brilliant results , but sometimes I failed miserably .So something some where is a flaw . rgds .
I have seen astrologers who have used wrong birthdata due to honest errors but yet managed to give brilliant results! God's Leela-Who could understand that? Certainly not a lowly MORTAL like this tiny ant...! <LOL>
Bookmarks