View Poll Results: Which Theory of Evolution do you believe in?

Voters
4. You may not vote on this poll
  • Subjective Evolution

    3 75.00%
  • Fossilisim - Darwins Theory.

    1 25.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Pataliputra, Magdha, Bharata
    Age
    24
    Posts
    68
    Rep Power
    40

    Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    Hari Bol!
    All glories to Sri Guru and Sri Gauranga

    Which do you believe in, both in Temporal and Ontological sense, your choice but explain your choice.
    By form I mean matter.

    Darwin theory - Form before Consciousness is the notion that consciousness is at first sight a biological phenomenon. Therefore, any model of consciousness needs to have robust biological foundations.
    Subjective Evolution - Consciousness before Form is the notion that Consciousness is producing everything. Consciousness is eternal.
    A little bit of Both - You believe some concepts of Darwin and the concepts of subjective evolution.

    Try and explain your answer

    Personally I believe in a temporal sense that Consciousness comes before Form and that the form is a product of our imagination (WILL EXPLAIN MY VIEWS SOON)
    Thank you,

    Jai Sri Radhe-Syam!
    Last edited by Samraat Bhismadeva Maurya; 25 July 2014 at 09:14 PM.
    "Hare Krisha Hare Krishna, Krishna Krishna Hare Hare, Hare Rama Hare Rama, Rama Rama Hare Hare" ¬ The Glorious Mahamantra. Chant this 108 times a day and keep Samsara away

  2. #2
    Join Date
    October 2009
    Location
    malaysia
    Posts
    134
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    Quote Originally Posted by Samraat Bhismadeva Maurya View Post
    Hari Bol!
    All glories to Sri Guru and Sri Gauranga

    Which do you believe in

    Darwin theory - Form before Consciousness
    Subjective Evolution - Consciousness before Form

    Try and explain your answer

    Thank you,

    Jai Sri Radhe-Syam!
    Namaste Ji,

    Great topic!

    If you ask me I think I rather believe in a little of both. (Sorry could not vote in your poll because you did not have the option for believing in a bit of both)

    Darwin dealt with physical evolution but he left Consciousness out of his equation and landed himself with the unsolved missing link.

    Evolution of Consciousness added to Darwins theory would complete the whole picture.

    Consciousness as in Universal Consciousness(UC) pervades the entire universe but its degree of awareness is subjective to the physical form it fills.

    For example compare a human and a tree..both have the same UC but the awareness is higher in the human because of the presence of the mind and the Central Nervous system and its network to support the mind and its functions and allowing the Consciousness to project itself in a higher manner as compared to a plant which lacks an intricate Central Nervous System(CNS)

    A less intricate CNS allows only a certain extent of projection of consciousness.

    So if you ask me I feel the both physical and consciousness evolution go hand in hand...both compliment each other.

    BTW if we take the Dashavatar..it does go along the lines of evolution.

    Matsya the Fish(Aquatic)

    Kurma the Turtle(which can also live on land and water)

    Varaha(The mammal..land creature)

    Naramsimha(Part man Part Animal)

    Vamana (Early man..short in stature)

    Parashurama(Developing man..aggressive in nature)

    Rama(The ideal human.)

    Krishna (Paramatma)

    Buddha (The Thinking man..in Kali Yuga we dont use much brawn to fight but man uses intellect more..men are smaller in Kali Yuga and head size of babies have increased compared to the past)

    Kalki(The man in charge)
    Last edited by renuka; 24 July 2014 at 11:15 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    November 2010
    Posts
    1,278
    Rep Power
    1651

    Re: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    Greetings,

    Quote Originally Posted by Samraat Bhismadeva Maurya View Post
    Darwin theory - Form before Consciousness
    Subjective Evolution - Consciousness before Form
    Are you meaning "before" in a temporal sense or an ontological sense?

    By form, do you mean matter?

    In any case, the traditional Hindu realist view is that time itself never "began to exist". Consciousness and matter are irreducible to each other and have always existed without beginning and will always exist without end.

    Do you have a third option, therefore, in your poll?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    September 2006
    Age
    71
    Posts
    7,705
    Rep Power
    223

    Re: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    hari o
    ~~~~~~
    namasté


    Quote Originally Posted by Samraat Bhismadeva Maurya View Post
    Hari Bol!
    All glories to Sri Guru and Sri Gauranga

    Which do you believe in

    Darwin theory - Form before Consciousness
    Subjective Evolution - Consciousness before Form

    Try and explain your answer

    Thank you,

    Jai Sri Radhe-Syam!
    How can one offer insight if they are not aware of this concept...

    As asked ( many many times) one should define their terms:

    Darwin theory - Form before Consciousness is the notion that __________( fill in accordingly)
    Subjective Evolution - Consciousness before Form is the notion that __________( fill in accordingly)

    This will be my last request on this matter... we will then start to delete the posts that care not to follow such a simple request.

    ... do as you see fit.

    iti śivaṁ
    यतस्त्वं शिवसमोऽसि
    yatastvaṁ śivasamo'si
    because you are identical with śiva

    _

  5. #5
    Join Date
    July 2012
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,089
    Rep Power
    2640

    Re: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    Namaste,

    Here's my simple take on it:

    First sound was born. From sound sky was born. From sky, water was born. From water, Fire was born. From Fire, earth was born. All these 5 'panchabhutas' did have consciousness of their own (or so I understand). The body of humans and other living entities which is but a combination of these panchabhutas, therefore had consciousness first before form.

    This is my understanding and I stand corrected, if any of my above assumptions is wrong.
    jai hanuman gyan gun sagar jai kapis tihu lok ujagar

  6. #6
    Join Date
    June 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    572
    Rep Power
    820

    Re: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    greetings and hello,
    The theistic schools do not ascribe "consciousness" to Jada prakriti and the thumb rule is that, when Agni is described as "Acting", its the jiva who is the atipathi of Agni is acting!

    Consciousness and Jada were eternal as per SD - every school accept this and so which came first is unanswerable question as they both are "anAdi".
    Last edited by yajvan; 25 July 2014 at 10:48 AM.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    July 2012
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,089
    Rep Power
    2640

    Re: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    Grames ji,

    I have a question. You say consciousness and Jada are Anadi. But surely before creation of the panchabutas and of the ultimate 'form' of beings on earth, this jadaa which existed as 'moola-prakriti' on bhagavan's body did not have any form of its own! Therefore only consciousness existed and ofcourse moola-prakriti (which I do not know what form it was) existed. Thus we can say consciousness existed before form?

    Thanks.
    jai hanuman gyan gun sagar jai kapis tihu lok ujagar

  8. #8
    Join Date
    June 2006
    Location
    Virginia, USA
    Posts
    572
    Rep Power
    820

    Re: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    Dear Viraja ji.,

    I believe your faith is in VA., so it is easy to explain! When you see the Aalilai Krshnan, He is conscious but He also holds the entire brahmanda along with the Jivas ( conscious entities) in the suspended state in His belly (little belly though)! So the MulaPrakriti is in suspended state of Brahmanda or with the modern words we can call it the "the original dimensionless mass" and the "forms" are also fixed ( 8400000) and the jiva is 'given' a particular form in the progress status of his journey towards "moksha"!

    These 8400000 forms are materials forms and Vaishnava schools also says, the Jiva has its original Rupa (form) svaRupa and that is what is gained after the Vraja bath! ( after the linga Deha is broken - the last material form)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    July 2012
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,089
    Rep Power
    2640

    Re: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    Thank you, Grames ji. Much appreciated.
    jai hanuman gyan gun sagar jai kapis tihu lok ujagar

  10. #10
    Join Date
    September 2006
    Age
    71
    Posts
    7,705
    Rep Power
    223

    Re: Fossilisim VS Subjective Evolutionisim

    hari o
    ~~~~~~
    namasté
    Quote Originally Posted by Viraja View Post
    . From sound sky was born. From sky, water was born. From water, Fire was born. From Fire, earth was born. All these 5 'panchabhutas' did have consciousness of their own (or so I understand). The body of humans and other living entities which is but a combination of these panchabhutas, therefore had consciousness first before form.

    This is my understanding and I stand corrected, if any of my above assumptions is wrong.
    I offer this just so we are avoiding mixing apples and oranges.

    If we choose to deal with sound then we're talking the 5 tanmātra-s. Yet if we then talk of sky and water ( ākāśa and jala) we have moved over to the mahābhuta-s.
    There is a slight difference, and thought it was worth mentioning.

    iti śiva
    यतस्त्वं शिवसमोऽसि
    yatastvaṁ śivasamo'si
    because you are identical with śiva

    _

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •