Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Synthesis of Science and Vedanta

  1. #1

    Synthesis of Science and Vedanta


    I read this earlier and thought it worthy of sharing. Harih Om

    All of us are always in Krshna, and Krshna in all of us. And Krshna is THE TRUTH as the DEEPEST CORE OF OUR "SELF", knowing/experiencing which nothing more remains to be known, because THAT IS THE CHANGELESS TRUTH BEYOND TIME AND SPACE WITHIN US AND ALL AROUND US.

    "Vishtabhya-AHAM-idam krithsnam,
    Ekaamshena sthitho jagath"
    (B.Githa 10.42).

    Untill this DIVINE TRUTH is experienced within, we would be in an eternal conflict with everyone and everything external to us at all levels. Wars are the gigantic forms of such avoidable conflicts.

    And this SCIENCE OF NON-DUALITY (ADVAITH) is the subject discussed in the countless Vedic Scriptures and Literatures, which on thè last count showed 2,400 plus Foundational ones, over 10,000 main commentaries and over 100,000 sub-commentaries ( Vedas, Brahmanas, Aranyakas, Upanishaths, Shad-Darshanas, Ithihaasas, Puranas and Upapuranas, etc), and the list is growing as every new SELF-REALIZED MAHATHMA adds his/her interpretations of THIS ETERNAL TRUTH to their followers.

    The wordings and languages may differ but THE TRUTH REMAINS THE SAME.....

    Only due to our ignorance, we are not able to experience this awesome beautifull SWEET TRUTH......

    To describe this ignorance of ours, "The food that we intake is broken down to GLUCOSE which is then carried to each of the cells in our body, which implies that our cells are enjoying the sweetness of glucose every moment, which is converted to ENERGY with which we think, talk and engage in various actions."
    But, after the food passes down our throat, do we feel the sweetness of glucose ? No. But, how many of us know that our cells are constantly enjoying sweetness ? Few. That is the type of ignorance that we are filled with.

    I can list many examples to illustrate the seriously foolish pursuits that we are engaged non-stop, due to our ignorance ruled by OUR ARROGANT EGO & DESIRES, which is delaying our SEEKING MODE TO DISCOVER THE DIVINE TRUTH that is our innermost solid FORM OF ETERNAL BLISS.....


    The word KRSHNA itself means, ONE WHO ATTRACTS (The word comes from AAKARSHAN = ATTRACTION). KRSHNA is the SWEET TRUTH residing deep inside us, (presented to u by the Greatest Sages of all, none other than Vyaasa Deva) in this KALPA of Manifestation of the Divine, "IN AND AS" this visible and in/non-visible universe, always silently attracting us. In our deepest state of meditation, we can hear His Flute, the ANAAHATHA-DHVANI, the OMKAARA-JAPAM in us and SEE HIM TOO...)

    "Shravanam madhuram,
    Nayanam madhuram,
    Vadanam madhuram,
    Kath'anam madhuram,
    Math'uraadhipather-Akhilam madhuram !!!"


    Rg veda, the oldest Scripture of the human race, mentions about practice of both deity worship (Saguna Brahmam) and worship of Nirguna/Niraakaara Brahmam. Krshna in Bhagavath Geetha 12.1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7, too mentions that UPAASAKs of BOTH NIRGUNA BRAHMAM and SAGUNA BRAHMAN attains LIBERATION from the temporary existence in physical forms and names.

    In fact, our great Rishis presented to us the OMNI-PRESENT, OMNI-POTENT AND OMNI-SCIENT DIVINE and then asked us to follow any path giving us the inconceivable and unperceivable infinitely vast DIVINITY in many forms and at various levels, understanding that different individuals have different tendencies and capabilities to understand.

    - SAGUNA BRAHMAM (SAAKAARA- with form)

    In Saguna Brahmam, all forms, names and bhaavas are given, mainly comprising of the following concepts :

    - AADI PARAASHAKTHI AS THE MAIN DEITY With Her 1000s of different names and forms
    - THOUSANDS OF UPA-DEVATHAS like Subramaniam, Ganapathi, Dharma Shaastha, Hanumanji, Vishva-karma, Naaga-Devathas, animals, trees, etc.
    - PRAKR'THI DEVI, mountains, Rivers,Trees, Theerha-sthaans

    I can go on listing more, but all these representations were given ONLY to assist everyone, from the simple uneducated individual to the highly intelligent seekers of TRUTH in their pursuit of THE DIVINE, according to the individual tendencies, tastes and levels of understandings.

    And it is very easy to observe that our Rishis have been successfull in their efforts, to keep the entire DHARMIC population, (barring a few defiant and foolish unthinking and non-observant aeithist fools and followers of foreign-born aggressive religious and violent ideologies, which do not allow the freedom to the believers to seek/discover the TRUTH OF THE OMNI-PRESENT DIVINE), is moving ahead with the rituals, customs and traditions, prescribed by the Ancient Rishis, still unbroken from the time of manifestation till now, of which one tradition of KUMBH MELAs from among many, which attract about 100s of millions of pilgrims attend with devotion, have taken the outside world by surprise......

    Bhagavath Geetha too briefly mentions the validity of both UPAASANAS of Nirguna and Saguna Brahmam. KRSHNA in Geetha 12.5 even mentions that Nirguna Brahmopaasana is more difficult than Saguna Brahmopaasana :

    "Klesho-adhika tharasth'eshaam-
    Avyaktha-asaktha chethasaam
    Avyakthaa hi gathir dukkham
    Dehavad'bhiravaapyathe ||"


    How does quantum physics work, you may ask, what is it, and where does it come from?

    In this article we discuss a very brief and simplified history of Quantum Mechanics and will quote what the founding fathers of this branch of science had to say about Vedic influence on the development of their theories.

    We are not interested in new age mumbo-jumbo. We are interested in understanding what is real and what is false. This is why we, along with all other great minds, consult the Vedic texts. Please read on…

    The famous Danish physicist and Nobel Prize winner, Laureate Niels Bohr (1885-1962) (pictured above), was a follower of the Vedas. He said, “I go into the Upanishads to ask questions.” Both Bohr and Schrödinger, the founders of quantum physics, were avid readers of the Vedic texts and observed that their experiments in quantum physics were consistent with what they had read in the Vedas.

    Niels Bohr got the ball rolling around 1900 by explaining why atoms emit and absorb electromagnetic radiation only at certain frequencies.

    Then, in the 1920’s Erwin Schrödinger (1887-1961), an Austrian-Irish physicist (pictured below), who won the Nobel prize, came up with his famous wave equation that predicts how the Quantum Mechanical wave function changes with time. Wave functions are used in Quantum Mechanics to determine how particles move and interact with time.

    In the 1920’s Werner Heisenberg (1901-1976) (pictured Left) formulated his famous uncertainty principal, which states when a physicist attempts to observe a subatomic particle, the experimental apparatus inevitably alters the subatomic particle’s trajectory. This is because they are trying to observe something that is of the same scale as the photons they are using to observe it.

    To be more specific, to observe something that is subatomic in size one must use a device (apparatus) that projects photons at the particle being observed. This is because the reception of photons by our retina is what we call vision. Basically, to observe something, we must bounce photons off it. The problem is that the photons disturb the subatomic particles because they are of the same size. Thus, there is no way to observe subatomic particles without altering their trajectories.

    Bohr, Heisenberg and Schrödinger regularly read Vedic texts. Heisenberg stated, “Quantum theory will not look ridiculous to people who have read Vedanta.” Vedanta is the conclusion of Vedic thought.

    Furthermore, Fritjof Capra, when interviewed by Renee Weber in the book The Holographic Paradigm (page 217–218), stated that Schrödinger, in speaking about Heisenberg, has said:
    “I had several discussions with Heisenberg. I lived in England then [circa 1972], and I visited him several times in Munich and showed him the whole manuscript chapter by chapter. He was very interested and very open, and he told me something that I think is not known publicly because he never published it. He said that he was well aware of these parallels. While he was working on quantum theory he went to India to lecture and was a guest of Tagore. He talked a lot with Tagore about Indian philosophy. Heisenberg told me that these talks had helped him a lot with his work in physics, because they showed him that all these new ideas in quantum physics were in fact not all that crazy. He realized there was, in fact, a whole culture that subscribed to very similar ideas. Heisenberg said that this was a great help for him. Niels Bohr had a similar experience when he went to China.”

    Consequently, Bohr adopted the Yin-Yang symbol as part of his family coat-of-arms when he was knighted in 1947.

    Schrodinger wrote in his book Meine Weltansicht:

    “This life of yours which you are living is not merely a piece of this entire existence, but in a certain sense the whole; only this whole is not so constituted that it can be surveyed in one single glance. This, as we know, is what the Brahmins [wise men or priests in the Vedic tradition] express in that sacred, mystic formula which is yet really so simple and so clear; tat tvam asi, this is you. Or, again, in such words as “I am in the east and the west, I am above and below, I am this entire world.”

    ब्रह्मैवेदममृतं पुरस्तात् ब्रह्म पश्चात् ब्रह्म उत्तरतो दक्षिणतश्चोत्तरेण ।
    अधश्चोर्ध्वं च प्रसृतं ब्रह्मैवेदं विश्वमिदं वरिष्ठम् ॥ 2.2.11
    This is a reference to the Mundaka Upanishad mantra (above) in which the Vedic understanding of the connectivity of living entities is put forward to help the Bhakta (practitioner of yoga) to understand the difference between the body and the living entity. How the real nature of the living entity is realized only in union with the source, the supreme being (Brahman/Krishna) through a platform of transcendental divine loving service.

    Schrödinger, in speaking of a universe in which particles are represented by wave functions, said, “The unity and continuity of Vedanta are reflected in the unity and continuity of wave mechanics. This is entirely consistent with the Vedanta concept of All in One.”

    “The multiplicity is only apparent. This is the doctrine of the Upanishads. And not of the Upanishads only. The mystical experience of the union with God regularly leads to this view, unless strong prejudices stand in the West.” (Erwin Schrödinger, What is Life?, p. 129, Cambridge University Press)

    “There is no kind of framework within which we can find consciousness in the plural; this is simply something we construct because of the temporal plurality of individuals, but it is a false construction… The only solution to this conflict insofar as any is available to us at all lies in the ancient wisdom of the Upanishad.” (Mein Leben, Meine Weltansicht [My Life, My World View] (1961), Chapter 4)

    In his biography on Schrödinger, Moore wrote: “His system – or that of the Upanishads – is delightful and consistent: the self and the world are one and they are all… He rejected traditional western religious beliefs (Jewish, Christian, and Islamic) not on the basis of any reasoned argument, nor even with an expression of emotional antipathy, for he loved to use religious expressions and metaphors, but simply by saying that they are naive.
    Vedanta and gnosticism are beliefs likely to appeal to a mathematical physicist, a brilliant only child, tempted on occasion by intellectual pride. Such factors may help to explain why Schrödinger became a believer in Vedanta, but they do not detract from the importance of his belief as a foundation for his life and work. It would be simplistic to suggest that there is a direct causal link between his religious beliefs and his discoveries in theoretical physics, yet the unity and continuity of Vedanta are reflected in the unity and continuity of wave mechanics. In 1925, the world view of physics was a model of the universe as a great machine composed of separable interacting material particles, During the next few years, Schrödinger and Heisenberg and their followers created a universe based on superimposed inseparable waves of probability amplitudes. This new view would be entirely consistent with the vedantic concept of the All in One.” (Schrödinger: Life and Thought (Meine Weltansicht), p. 173)

    In Schrödinger’s famous essay on determinism and free will, he expressed very clearly the sense that consciousness is a unity, arguing that this “insight is not new…From the early great Upanishads the recognition Atman = Brahman (the personal self equals the omnipresent, all-comprehending eternal self) was in Indian thought considered, far from being blasphemous, to represent, the quintessence of deepest insight into the happenings of the world. The striving of all the scholars of Vedanta was, after having learnt to pronounce with their lips, really to assimilate in their minds this grandest of all thoughts.”

    According to Moore on page 125 of his biographical work, A Life of Erwin Schrödinger, Schrödinger found “Vedanta teaches that consciousness is singular, all happenings are played out in one universal consciousness and there is no multiplicity of selves… The stages of human development are to strive for Possession (Artha), Knowledge (Dharma), Ability (Kama), Being (Moksha)… Nirvana is a state of pure blissful knowledge. It has nothing to do with individual. The ego or its separation is an illusion. The goal of man is to preserve his Karma and to develop it further – when man dies his karma lives and creates for itself another carrier.”

    The above quote clearly demonstrates Schrödinger’s firm belief in reincarnation.

    Schrödinger wrote in his book My View of the World: “In all the world, there is no kind of framework within which we can find consciousness in the plural; this is simply something we construct because of the temporal plurality of individuals, but it is a false construction….The only solution to this conflict in so far as any is available to us at all lies in the ancient wisdom of the Upanishad” (p. 31).

    The Vedas teach that we are more than physical bodies operating according to the laws of physics and chemistry. We, the eternal conscious self (Atma), are inherently connected to the greater whole (ParamAtma), and this eternal inherent connection is totally transcendental to matter. All living entities (Atmas), having free will, are able to ignore this connection or recognize it. The Vedas teach us how to do both. When we act as scientists and look for facts and accept them and then go on to use and act according to our new realizations we can make great progress. Similarly, as living entities, we must scientifically study the great work of the evidential books of the Vedas in order to help us realize the facts of this universe and beyond, and our natural position in it.

    Schrödinger explicitly affirmed his conviction that Vedantic jnana (knowledge) represents the only true view of reality, a view for which he was prepared to offer empirical proof (Klaus K. Klostermaier, A Short Introduction to Hinduism, p. 168).

    Regarding mystical insights, Schrödinger tells us: “The multiplicity is only apparent. This is the doctrine of the Upanishads, and not of the Upanishads only. The mystical experience of the union with God regularly leads to this view, unless strong prejudices stand in the West” (Amaury de Riencourt, The Eye of Shiva: Eastern Mysticism and Science, p.78).

    In autumn of 1925 Schrödinger wrote an interestingly personal account of his philosophy of life called Mein Weltansicht – My World View.

    He completed this in 1960. In chapter 5 of this book he gives his understanding of the basic view of Vedanta. He writes, “Vedanta teaches that consciousness is singular, all happenings are played out in one universal consciousness and there is no multiplicity of selves.”

    Maya (illusion) is the cause of our faulty identification with this material world. In all the embodied forms of existence, Atma (the individual living entity) is fully able to at any time revive his forgotten, eternal and inherent connection with Brahman or Paramatma, the supreme self and source of all the living entities.

    Schrödinger did not believe that it is possible to demonstrate the unity of consciousness by logical arguments. One must make an imaginative leap guided by communion with nature and the persuasion of analogies. He understood the nonmaterial eternal nature of the conscious self and how the Atman is intimately connected to the supreme.

    In the 1920’s quantum mechanics was created by the three great minds mentioned above: Heisenberg, Bohr and Schrödinger, who all read from and greatly respected the Vedas. They elaborated upon these ancient books of wisdom in their own language and with modern mathematical formulas in order to try to understand the ideas that are to be found throughout the Vedas, referred to in the ancient Sanskrit as “Brahman,” “Paramatma,” “Akasha” and “Atman.” As Schrödinger said, “some blood transfusion from the East to the West to save Western science from spiritual anemia.”

    In 1935 Einstein Prodolsky and Rosen challenged Quantum Mechanics on the grounds that it was an incomplete formulation. They were the first authors to recognize that quantum mechanics is inherently non-local, which means it allows for instantaneous action across arbitrarily great distances. So an action in one place can instantly influence something on the other side of the universe in no time at all. This very powerful paper (The EPR paper) explaining Quantum Entanglement changed the world and alerted us to the magical implications of quantum mechanics’ metaphysical implications.

    But, Einstein states in his letter from to Max Born, 3 March 1947, “Es gibt keine spukhafte Fernwirkung” which translates to “There is no spooky action at a distance.” He did not believe in magic. He believed in science and would regularly read the Bhagavad-gita. Einstein’s famous quote on the Bhagavad-gita is: “When I read the Bhagavad-gita and reflect about how God created this universe everything else seems so superfluous.” He also wrote in his book The World as I See It, “I maintain that the cosmic religious feeling is the strongest and noblest motive for scientific research” (p. 24-28).

    Physicists have not yet ascertained whether Bohr and company or Einstein and company are right.

    One thing that all this materialistic research has done is open up the doors for the world to look deeper into the validity of the Vedas. For, it is stated in the Bhagavad-gita, “A mundaner 1) is sure to commit mistakes, 2) is invariably illusioned, 3) has the tendency to cheat others and 4) is limited by imperfect senses. With these four imperfections, one cannot deliver perfect information of all-pervading knowledge.” So no matter how many experiments we conduct, we can never come to the absolute truth using imperfect instruments of perception, even if we have a super brain like Einstein or Schrödinger. For our very minds, thoughts and power of intelligence only work on the platform of time and space and are rendered defective from being subject to the four defects that the Bhagavad-gita mentions. So we must come to accept a higher authority, not a mundane person of the material world that is limited by his own imperfect senses and instruments in a laboratory. We must approach Krishna, the supreme person! We must give Him the credit for he is the supreme father of all Quantum processes that all these other men mentioned in this article are trying to understand. He established all the laws of nature and is controlling it; it is by His will that we will or will not ever understand. For the Vedas are coming from Krishna and are ultimately meant to help us understand and love Krishna, the supreme being. The dry mental speculators and scientists (depicted at the bottom of the picture, at left) try by their own limited power of intellect and observation to understand Krishna/God, unaware that Krishna is only known by those fortunate souls that serve Him in the mood of love and surrender. Let us not forget, “God” means the all powerful; we cannot force the all powerful supreme personality to reveal Himself to us by our own limited strength and arrangements. Krishna is way above that. The scientific process to understand Krishna and the nature of the universe is to learn from a fully self-realized soul, like Srila Prabhupada. By reading his books, chanting the hare Krishna Maha mantra and practicing celibacy (controlling the senses), we may purify our minds and hearts so we are qualified to understand Srila Prabhupada’s transcendental books and the Vedic literature and thus surrender to the supreme being, Krishna.

    Since scientists like Schrödinger did not possess a direct knowledge of Sanskrit to discern first-hand what the Vedic texts actually were saying, they were forced to read various translations of these great books of wisdom, such as the Upanishads. There are persons like Robert Oppenheimer (1904 – 1967) (pictured on left) who were not lacking in such an advantage. Oppenheimer learned Sanskrit in 1933 and read the Bhagavad-gita in the original, citing it later as one of the most influential books to shape his philosophy of life, stating that “The Vedas are the greatest privilege of this century.”

    Upon witnessing the world’s first nuclear test in 1945, he instantly quoted Bhagavad-gita chapter 11, text 32, “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.”

    Vedic texts such as the Bahgavad-gita and the Upanishads were collectively considered the most influential books ever written by eminent people like Thoreau, Kant, Schopenhauer, Schrödinger, Werner Heisenberg , Tesla, Einstein etc.

    The fact is that, irrespective of east or west, great minds that come in contact with the Vedic texts agree that the ultimate reality remains timeless and changeless, and is contained in the Vedic texts such as the Bhagavad-gita and the Upanishads.

    Furthermore 300 years before Quantum Mechanics, Sir Isaac Newton came up with Classical Mechanics which describes very basic action and reaction. Newton’s entire work in Physics and Calculus was taken wholesale from the Vedas and Kerala book of Calculus. It was simply taken from the Vedas where it was originally used for calculating rates of change in Astronomy and Astrology for many thousands of years before Newton.

    Another genius scientist was Nikola Tesla, a super genius Serbian. Tesla, along with the others mentioned above, knew that the ancient Indian Brahmans (wise men), well equipped with knowledge from the Vedas, had understandings of the intricate laws, mathematical formulas and subtle workings of the universe that far surpass anything we can even imagine today.

    It is uncertain how Nikola Tesla was introduced to the Vedas. Much of Tesla’s life and work has been erased from history due to this mastermind inventor and scientist wanting to make the fruits of all his work available for free to the world (google “free energy Tesla” and your mind will be truly blown away). Unfortunately for us, because he was not trying to use his genius for profiteering and exploiting others he was met with one setback after another. His grants and funding were constantly being revoked by those that control the economy and trade. Nikola Tesla originally invented many things that we all use on a daily basis but most people have never even heard of him because his name was removed from common history (just like much of the teaching of the Vedas) and he was eventually murdered. I guess he know too much and wanted to share it freely for the betterment of mankind (just like the Vedas), not to exploit it. Unfortunately not everyone saw eye to eye with him.

    Tesla understood the great power of Zero Point Field or Akasha or Ether: the power of space between the electrons and the nucleus. Vivekanda’s effect on Tesla was so great that he became vegetarian, became celibate and started using Sanskrit words. He died with his scalar energy science in his head, because he did NOT want the US military to use it to destroy the planet. No wonder he was denied the Nobel prize and eventually killed. Knowledge is power, and there are many people that want all the power for themselves. Tesla wanted to give power to everyone for free! He was actually the first person to figure out how to make radio communication possible across the Atlantic ocean. But because he wanted to make this ability free for others his funding was stopped and the credit was later given to someone else that played the power game better than him.

    Here is just a small list of some of Tesla’s contributions to the world that he has not been given credit for:

    Alternating Current -AC electricity (Thomas Edison literally stole his ideas from him and took the credit for for it).
    Radio (Marconi just took the ideas and work of Tesla and got the cerdit for it).
    Hydro-electricity (Tesla Built the first Hydro-electric power plant at Niagara falls As a result we see whats there now)
    transistors (you are using a transistor right now to view this webpage )
    Resonant frequency (every one else figured it out 50 yeas later)
    Fluorescent and Neon lighting
    The induction motor
    The rotating magnetic field (precursor to gyroscope)
    Arc lighting
    Tesla coil
    Encryption technology and scrambler
    Wireless communication and power transmission
    remote control
    Telegeodynamics (a way to search for metals and minerals)
    Tachometer and speedometer
    Refrigeration machines
    Bladeless turbines and pumps
    Cryogenic engineering
    reactive jet dirigible (precursor to Harrier jet)
    Hovercraft Flivver plane (precursor to Osprey helicopter/aircraft)
    Particle-beam weapons (precursor to Starwars)

    All Tesla’s engineering was done in his head, he never worked things out on paper or used scale models to come to a functioning final result. He was truly empowered by Krishna. Things would appear in his head and he would simply record it exactly as it came to him, similar to Beethoven.

    Below is a picture of the tower Tesla built in the early 1900s in Shoreham, New York referred to as “Wardenclyffe.” This tower was proposed to be a model for more of these towers located around the world to provide free wireless energy to everyone. Upon J.P. Morgan’s finding out it was not equipped with any type of meter to monitor who was using how much of the energy it provided and was thus not for profit he ripped Tesla’s funding out from under him and the tower was torn down.

    Tesla tower

    Tesla lived to be 86 years old. He was 6 ft. 2 in. (1.88 m) tall and reported to be strikingly handsome. He was also a celibate his whole life. This goes in line with the teachings of the Vedas that Tesla and other master minds were familiar with. The Vedas recommend for yogis, and those wanting super intelligence and inner power, to conserve their own divine energy by observing celibacy. As Tesla himself has said, “The gift of mental power comes from God, divine being, and if we concentrate our minds on that truth, we become in tune with this great power.” and “Our senses enable us to perceive only a minute portion of the outside world.”

    There is an interesting video on Tesla and how he understood the secrets hidden in the pyramids of Egypt and other ancient cultures that were more advanced then our modern culture of machines.

    Now ask yourself why don’t we learn about the Vedas in school? Instead we are told it is all just some hindu “mythology.” Maybe for the same reason, we have not ever heard about Mr. Nikola Tesla.

    Although not a physicist, the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer (1788 – 1860) I feel also deserves a place in this article due the fact that he read a Latin translation of the Vedic texts and also glorified the Upanishads in his main work, The World as Will and Representation (1819), as well as in his Parerga and Paralipomena(1851). He found his own philosophy was in accord with the Vedic ideas.

    He states: “That I encounter in the Vedas deep original lofty thoughts, suffused with a high and holy seriousness”


    “If the reader has also received the benefit of the Vedas, the access to which by means of the Upanishads is in my eyes the greatest privilege which this still young century (1818) may claim before all previous centuries, if then the reader, I say, has received his initiation in primeval Indian wisdom, and received it with an open heart, he will be prepared in the very best way for hearing what I have to tell him. It will not sound to him strange, as to many others, much less disagreeable; for I might, if it did not sound conceited, contend that every one of the detached statements which constitute the Upanishads, may be deduced as a necessary result from the fundamental thoughts which I have to enunciate, though those deductions themselves are by no means to be found there.”
    (source: The World as Will and Representation Preface to the first edition, p. xiii)


    And, what is the highest TRUTH as given in the Vedic Scriptures ?



    Aham Brahmasmi, Thathvamasi, Sarvam khalu idam Brahmam !!!
    I am Brahmam, You are Brahmam, All that there is Brahmam !!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    October 2010
    Cradle of Civilisation
    Rep Power

    Re: Synthesis of Science and Vedanta

    Why should Science be the arbiter of reality? I have friends who feel Science is fool proof and its framework is flawless (some of them are PhDs top technical schools in the world), a very sad thing. Why should people defend Vedanta on the lines of simiarities as seen through Science?

    Science is a fallacious enterprise based on statistical observations. Vedanta is experiential.
    ॐ महेश्वराय नमः

    || Om Namo Bhagavate Rudraya ||

    Hara Hara Mahadeva Shambo Shankara

  3. #3

    Re: Synthesis of Science and Vedanta

    Namaste Realdemigod Ji,

    Your right Vedanta does not need to defend itself against science, neither does it have anything to prove. Part of the above post was citing how many scientists have increased their understanding or found support in Vedanta, not that Vedanta is seeking anything from science.

    The first part of the post is my friends writing on Krshna and secondly the same author took quotes from my gurudeva's publication on the synthesis of science and religion, a couple of books formed by two conferences set up to discuss not the differences but the way that science and religion/spirituality can live harmoniously, there were some notable names and noble laureates who attended and the events were considered as a success. Some people want Vedanta or their faith to be proved scientifically, personally I dont think its possible, for at some point it goes beyond the ordinary sense experience, so how can that experience be conveyed exactly within the realm of sense, mind and intellect, so there is a parting at some point, but its not a division.

    I think the language is slowly changing, people now compared to 15-30 years ago are more open minded. Vedanta is good for science because at its core it can be an objective study, your allowed intellectual inquiry as well as perfecting it by ultimate experience.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    October 2012
    Rep Power

    Re: Synthesis of Science and Vedanta

    Quote Originally Posted by realdemigod View Post
    Why should Science be the arbiter of reality? I have friends who feel Science is fool proof and its framework is flawless (some of them are PhDs top technical schools in the world), a very sad thing. Why should people defend Vedanta on the lines of simiarities as seen through Science?

    Science is a fallacious enterprise based on statistical observations. Vedanta is experiential.
    Namaste RealDemiGod,

    Very good question. Like you have mentioned I see Science is based on the available data and Veda(nta) is the process(es) that generate data.

    Because processes have their own will, I don't agree with non duality. Keeping the differences aside, I completely agree with your views.

    On non duality:
    My thought is influenced by the object oriented paradigm. One parent is a child of an another parent and the cycle ends at Sriman Naaraayan. Just because it ends at Sriman Naaraayan it is always true that we all imbibe (one to many) characteristics of Sriman Naaraayan but can we say we are Sriman Naaraayan?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    October 2010
    Cradle of Civilisation
    Rep Power

    Re: Synthesis of Science and Vedanta

    Namaste markandeya 108 dasa,
    It is good to see once in a while some scientists accept that they got inspired from mythic tales or some concepts from Vedanta or any other Indian philosophy. Their position is better than most scientists who claim they found everything on their own from their research and data and vehemently rejecting any evidence seen in our philosopies. It is just their ego and they want to win the Nobel Prize, which is fine.

    But it is little disappointing that some real saints or gurus engage themselves in debates or have conversations with scientists to prove concepts in Vedanta as per scientific framework. Why should they do it in the first place? I can only think of that it is their effort to propagate Vedanta or any other philosopy among self-assumed sophisticated intellectual crowd.

    To me people who can't even begin to think that science could have limitations or scientific framework could be fallacious are not deemed to be involved in conversations with realised saints or gurus. It is silly to try to explain something sacred, undescribable and unspeakable in terms of equations, theories with lots of assumptions and loopholes etc.,

    Namaste Anirudh,
    I have not experienced Brahman yet but it sounds very sane, logically true from all the books I read so far (metaphysics, channelled, psychedelics etc.,) . But just because I accept Vedanta does not mean I deny Sriman Naaraayana. Duality and Non-duality do not matter to me much, experience is my truth.
    ॐ महेश्वराय नमः

    || Om Namo Bhagavate Rudraya ||

    Hara Hara Mahadeva Shambo Shankara

  6. #6

    Re: Synthesis of Science and Vedanta


    I agree that true Vedanta does not have as much in common with modern science as people like to make out, Anirdhu Ji perfectly summed this up
    Science is based on the available data and Veda(nta) is the process(es) that generate data
    so there is a relation between ultimate reality and conventional reality. Vedanta as I understand is not sectarian or limited to anything.

    It is for both the simple farmer who sings simple folk dialect about the Supreme and the Scientist who may have some sort of super brain and looks in his own way to fathom out the mysteries of reality and everything in between, Vedanta is the complete whole, which ultimately cant be realized through the senses.

    The Vedanta deals with a theme beyond the finite views of phenomena. The subject dealt with in that particular philosophy is not confined to any part of the material space, any definite span of time or any substance of this Universe. The activities of a being are measured in time, the playground of a being either linear, superficial or cubical is accommodated in space and the limited subjectivity or fleshly tabernacular entity is confirmed to phenomena. The Vedantic scheme is quite different from such limited structural monuments though some people attempted to bring Vedanta within the prison bars of the senses.
    Srila Bhatisiddhanta Saraswati The Vedanta~It's Morphology and Ontology.

    The highest spiritual essence can be realized only by inner intuitive contact( pratibodha), not by logical reasoning. The fundamental essence of man is the inner illumination of pure thought, which is also the ultimate principle underlying all things. This immortal essence cannot be grasped by the intellect, but only realized by superior intuition(pratibodha), and this is the mysticism of the Upanishads.
    Brief summation on Hindu Mysticism ~S.N Dasgupta

  7. #7
    Join Date
    September 2006
    Rep Power

    Re: Synthesis of Science and Vedanta

    hariḥ om̐

    markandeya 108 dasa writes,

    I agree that true Vedanta does not have as much in common with modern science as people like to make out
    I see this differently , not in opposition but from a different vantage point. Science is growing and evolving. They are coming to terms with not being able to explain everything so a vision of possibilities begin to emerge.

    I ask the reader ( who is a Netflix user) to view 'Einstein's Biggest Blunder' - done in the year 2000. They talk of the Supreme without even knowing they are doing it; they are talking in 'their' language of science. I 'hear' it in the language of vedānta and trika.

    But what question does this science' answer?
    bhāgavad gītā , chapter 9 , 8th śloka:

    prakṛtim svām avastabhya
    visrjami punaḥ punaḥ |
    bhūta-grāmam imaṁ kṛtsnam
    avaśaṁ prakṛter vaśāt ||

    This says curving back (leaning, resting-upon or avaṣṭabhya) onto my SELF (svām) I create (visṛjāmi) again and again (punaḥ punaḥ).
    All this (kṛtsnam) which exists ( manifestation and variety bhūta-grāmam) , that comes into creation (prakṛti) is done by my authority or command (vaśāt).

    How can 'again and again' occur if the conservation of energy is a rigid law ? This documentary solves this puzzle. The documentary was so appealing & insightful I had to watch it twice.

    iti śivaṁ
    Last edited by yajvan; 16 October 2016 at 02:16 PM.
    यतस्त्वं शिवसमोऽसि
    yatastvaṁ śivasamo'si
    because you are identical with śiva


  8. #8
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Rep Power

    Re: Synthesis of Science and Vedanta

    Namaste Markandeya and Yajvan ji,

    To me, VedAnta is the ultimate science. I am not saying just because of my belief system and just because I am a Hindu. Long back, when I was discussing Advaita VedAnta with a young English boy (who was a real expert on Advaita VedAnta and I was just a novice at that time) on internet, the discussion went into such depths that it became my obsession to keep thinking over what and how it was scientific and logical. I am student of science and an engineer by profession. So, this was my natural inclination. The more I thought over it, the more I came to understand that Science has a long way to go to be able to reveal the ultimate Truth that is hidden right in front of all of us. The more I thought over it, the more I got convinced that there is some eternal unchanging Reality behind all this multitude that we see. I came to realise that true science cannot be complete only on our researches on matter and energy, it must include consciousness as well.

    Science has shown us how matter converts into energy and vice-versa. However, the real question that needs an answer is : "How matter + energy gets converted into consciousness or consciousness gets converted into matter and energy ?". Without answering this question, science is highly inadequate to answer questions on the Ultimate Reality. We all know these things and we all don't know these things :

    a) We know from science : Every object of a certain mass attracts another object of a certain mass with a precise mathematically calculated force.
    What we don't know : How does one object know where the other object is, what its mass is, what the mass of other object is and how far it is located ? If we change the distance or the masses, who knows that a change has occurred and who and how the forces are readjusted in proportion of changes ?
    b) We know that the chemicals can interact and create an intelligent entity called virus which is capable of camouflaging, reproducing etc. Where from this intelligence come into the virus when chemicals are non-living things without brains or thinking capabilities ??
    c) A star fish when cut into many pieces and left to survive in water ... turns into many individual star fishes. When it was just one star fish, it had one brain and one individuality. From where does a number of individuality and different brains / thinking capabilities come from just one body with one individuality and one brain / thinking capability ??

    These answers are real challenges for science where it is today. VedAnta answers all these questions. Yes, it doesn't answer the laws of science within our relative state of existence but that is not the aim of VedAnta anyway.

    "Om Namo Bhagvate Vaasudevaye"

  9. #9

    Re: Synthesis of Science and Vedanta

    Namaste Yajvan Ji and Devotee Ji,

    I see this differently , not in opposition but from a different vantage point. Science is growing and evolving. They are coming to terms with not being able to explain everything so a vision of possibilities begin to emerge.
    I agree to this. What I meant is that sometimes there is to much effort to prove certain parts of Vedanta within the empirical model, which leads to pseudo science and wrong translation of Shastra, a couple of examples is trying to find devic lokas through the empirical shared senses that we all share in common , what science would like to have is an objective viewing of say Indraloka where anyone of any type of consciousness can see it, for science to accept that Indraloka is existing maybe they need a photograph like the moon, build a space ship and visit it, as I understand this is not the way to access indraloka, to access indraloka according to my study and understanding is that it is accessed via the quality of consciousness, so it cant be empirically proved, even if it is universally accessible, via a different method than the current empirical one. If any of my understanding is incorrect please point out. Whats seems to be coming more and more clear is that the cosmology of the Vedas or the universe is something that is Mind born , where the current empirical model is seeing the start of the universe as some type of big bang or reaction in the phenomenal elements with no other cause. This is usually the problem where Vedantists or people who follow dharma traditions can get stuck in, trying to prove to much with only one system of acquiring knowledge, both are fine and both have their context. To understand the universe according to Vedanta and similar traditions it is only understood through consciousness, which is the missing link in science. If Vedanta is the complete whole the Absolute, we have to include consciousness as part of this reality, yet empirical science is still trying to say that consciousness is an emergence of the conditions which gives it variety, there does not need to be something deeper than this, it does not need a spiritual dimension, so science falls from introspect into behaviorism.

    Now this does not mean that the science of emerging consciousness as compounded phenomena is dismissed by the Vedantist, its part of the course, but what lies underneath the conditions is also expounded with the means of access~ sadhana and upaya. So Vedanta will understand both the phenomenal world and its causes but with a broader view of the Absolute, The Vedanta~ Brahman.

    Devotee Ji,

    I came to the same conclusion and that is the inclusion of the study of consciousness within science, its the key point, the missing link. Does the current modern scientific model have sufficient knowledge of what is meant by consciousness on par with the Vedantic paradigm, I think not, as it requires a paradigm shift, the scientist himself has to become a sadhaka, a vedantist, a yogi, a meditator a shanti upasyati peaceful worshiper of the Absolute to know what is the real nature of consciousness as both emerging within conditions and as non changing in its real essence. Logic and reason only go so far.

    One simple example is if there was say a yogi and a modern scientist and there were 2 simple experiments with water one would have the same result and the other is a vast difference, this is where consciousness becomes important.

    If the Yogi and the modern scientists boiled water then they will both see objectively that the boiling point is 100 degrees, this is a fact, no matter how many times its tested with as many people taking up this experiment the water will always boil at 100 degrees.

    If both the scientist and the yogi drank water, the scientist maybe thinking of water or analyzing water as h2o and other chemical compounds, his mind will take him into all sorts of observations, while the Yogi will experience Brahm Jnana, as Krsna says in Gita. This is the difference, modern science always wants to externalize everything when the yogi internalizes himself to reach the conscious Absolute state of seeing that its not limited to inside or outside, the experience of the yogi is an all pervasive reality that is not separate from itself, Absolute Knowledge, end of knowledge ~Vedanta.
    Last edited by markandeya 108 dasa; 19 October 2016 at 05:31 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 'adhyAtmavidyA' in Synthesis: 16. Summation
    By saidevo in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 22 August 2008, 02:34 AM
  2. 'adhyAtmavidyA' in Synthesis: 7. The Last Answer
    By saidevo in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 13 February 2008, 06:15 AM
  3. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03 February 2008, 01:34 PM
  4. 'adhyAtmavidyA' in Synthesis: 3. Uncertainties
    By saidevo in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 28 January 2008, 07:45 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 27 January 2008, 03:14 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts