Re: Silent versus Vocal Chanting
Namaste
Inspired by this post I found three websites which I want to share ... they confirm what conquersex noted: Loudly or silently, everything is all right.
One can utter the holy name clearly with proper pronunciation in an audible voice (vācika), or fix the mind on God and move the lips inaudibly(upāmśu), or ponder the meaning and practice silently with no movement of the lips (mānasika), which is preferred.
The scriptures say that mānasika japa can be practiced at all times and in all places. Swami Vivekananda says, ‘The inaudible repetition of the Mantra, accompanied with the thinking of its meaning, is called the “mental repetition,” and is the highest.’
Source http://www.hindupedia.com/en/Japa
More about japa https://www.hinduwebsite.com/hinduism/concepts/japa.asp
And last but not least
Question: I would like to know which chanting is more powerful, in the mind or audibly.
1) Srila Jiva Gosvami writes in his Krama sandarbha: “The names of God should be chanted loudly.”
2) Baladeva Vidyabhusana explain in the Stava malabibhusana bhasya, “If one chants the Hare Krsna mantra loudly, Krsna personally dances on his tongue.”
3) In Caitanya-bhagavata Adi Khanda, with purports of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta, it says that loud chanting is best.
In regards to 100 times, there are slokas which say that manasic chanting is 1000 time superior to vacika. Of course one may say that it is applicable only to Vedic mantras and not to the Name. Vedic mantras should not be chanted loudly. But when chanted like a mantra, the Name should follow the rules for Vedic mantras. Loud chanting is kirtan and manasic japa is smaranam and both have their glory. Mahaprabhu glorifies kirtana – kirtaniya sada hari, and also smaranam – smarane na kala.
Source https://www.jiva.org/questions-and-answers-on-chanting
Pranam
Dance with Shiva - live with Shiva - merge with Shiva
Bookmarks