Arguments and counter-arguments in bhakti
Namaste,
*Not taking any sides, just sharing some observations in bhakti*
i) Practices such as Kavadi (mainly done for Murugan), Fire-walk (done for goddesses like Mariamman)
Argument: True bhakti is seen in devotees doing the above. Only those of exalted caliber in bhakti can really perform these.
Counter: Bhakti grows from obeying an acharya's words and doing service to him and other devotees, taking the attitude of 'servant to servant'. Undergoing painstaking amount of kavadi-like rituals are mere remedies for anything wrong done. They do not exalt bhakti.
ii) Upavas (fasting)
Argument: For spiritual progress and for transgressing the many material desires, upavas in necessary. When done on Ekadasi day, reaps the best results.
Counter: Saibaba and many other sadhus have mentioned one should not and never fast. Fasting and undergoing bodily discomfort is not necessary for progress in bhakti or spiritual sadhana.
* * *
Have you seen other arguments and their counters in bhakti? If so, please share.
Thanks,
Viraja
jai hanuman gyan gun sagar jai kapis tihu lok ujagar
Bookmarks