Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 73

Thread: Saga of the "ego"

  1. #1

    Saga of the "ego"

    Dear Friends:

    Not too long ago a sage from India (popularly known as – Amma) passed through San Francisco and a friend of mine had the opportunity to attend her discourse. While chatting with my friend, I was told about the speaker who had said, “Everything is God’s creation accept the ego”. I began to think about this profound statement. How true it really is!! Every soul is trying to turn to God because that is where it belongs, which is in the presence of God. Yet, the ego does not want to turn to God because God is not its creator!

    What is every one’s perspective regarding the truth in this profound statement (quote above)? Or, perhaps, that could form the basis for a deeper discussion on the nature and the role of the “ego” in creation and in man’s spiritual journey.

    Blessings,

  2. #2
    Join Date
    April 2006
    Location
    NY State
    Age
    66
    Posts
    552
    Rep Power
    99

    Re: Saga of the "ego"

    Accept and except the ego


    ZN
    yaireva patanaM dravyaiH siddhistaireva choditA .
    shrI kauladarshane chApi bhairaveNa mahAtmanA .

    It is revealed in the sacred doctrine of Kula and by the great Bhairava, that the perfection is achieved by that very means by which fall occurs.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    India
    Posts
    4,193
    Rep Power
    369

    Re: Saga of the "ego"

    Quote Originally Posted by nirotu View Post
    Dear Friends:

    ---- “Everything is God’s creation accept the ego”. ----- Yet, the ego does not want to turn to God because God is not its creator!

    -----

    Hello Nirotu,

    I am not sure that I understand the above fully.

    Om
    That which is without letters (parts) is the Fourth, beyond apprehension through ordinary means, the cessation of the phenomenal world, the auspicious and the non-dual. Thus Om is certainly the Self. He who knows thus enters the Self by the Self.

  4. #4

    Re: Saga of the "ego"

    Quote Originally Posted by Atanu Banerjee View Post
    Hello Nirotu,

    I am not sure that I understand the above fully.

    Om
    Dear Atanu:

    The statement is a quote from a sage from India, “Every thing is God’s creation except the Ego”. The meaning is implicit in the statement that only man’s ego does not share the same origin that everything else in the manifest creation shares.

    I am interested in knowing the nature, role, source and quality of man’s ego in this manifest creation.

    What are your thoughts?

    Blessings,

  5. #5
    Join Date
    August 2006
    Age
    72
    Posts
    3,162
    Rep Power
    1915

    Re: Saga of the "ego"

    Namaste Nirotu.

    Nice to hear from you again.

    "Every thing is God's creation except the Ego".

    You say that these are the words of Mata Amritanandamayi, popularly known as Ammachi to her devotees, the 'Amma' or Holy Mother, who is renowned, revered and loved the world over. I searched google for this quote that your friend has said she spoke in a discourse in San Francisco, but couldn't find any link to the actual quote. Could you or your friend provide a link to the discourse or a news publication where she used these words in her discourse?

    I ask for the source link because Ammachi is a staunch, stark Advaitin who would consider everything that is manifest as a veil over Atman that is the Brahman in every particle of the universe, from the grossest to the subtlest and then beyond. What Ammachi actually says is that the ego is unreal, just like every other manifestation or projection over the Atman is. For her, liberation is not discovering, only uncovering.

    "Every thing is God's creation except the Ego".

    Your impression on this statement from an Advaitin (assuming that she said it) is that in the spiritual journey "Every soul is trying to turn to God because that is where it belongs, which is in the presence of God. Yet, the ego does not want to turn to God because God is not its creator!"

    So this creates a state of duality: the Souls, created by God on the one side and the Ego not created by God on the other; an Ego that wouldn't want to turn to God, acts against God's designs for the souls, like the Asuras or the biblical Satan. And then there is God, the Almighty, sitting in his throne in the heavens and watching the drama of life until the day of dispensing judgment. The goal of the journey of the Souls in this manifest creation is to reach God's heaven. Do the words, supposedly from Ammachi the staunch Advaitin, support this concept of duality which is essentially Christian?

    We turn to a beautiful interview she gave to Amy Edelstein of the What is Enlightenment magazine and published in their Website http://www.wie.org/j17/amma.asp?pf=1. This interview clears many doubts and gives a verily enlightening account of the "nature, role, source and quality of man’s ego in this manifest creation" that you seek to know.

    Here are some relevant excerpts, but it is best to read the full interview at the link given.

    When You Go Beyond the Ego You Become an Offering to the World

    An interview with Mata Amritanandamayi
    by Amy Edelstein
    (http://www.wie.org/j17/amma.asp?pf=1)

    WIE: What is ego?

    MATA AMRITANANDAMAYI: You are actually asking, what is unreality? But how can unreality be described? What use is there in talking about something that isn't real, that is nonexistent? And how can you speak about that which is real? Amma can only give you a few hints. The mind is the ego. But the ego is a big lie—it is a liar. It is unreal.

    [Amma goes on to narrate an astonishingly simple and revealing story: The cowherd boy saw that the rope of one of his cows was missing. He seeks the advice of a wise man for what to do to make the cow stay tied to the post overnight. The sage advices him to pretend to tie the cow in front of her. The cow sees the boy's act of tying and thinks she is secure. The next morning she won't move for grazing when the ropes of other cows are untied, because she thinks she is still tied to her post! The boy again pretends to untie her as advised by the sage and the cow happily trots after him!]

    This is what the guru does with the ego of the disciple. The guru helps untie that which was never there. Like the cow, due to our ignorance, we believe that we are bound by the ego when, in fact, we are completely free. We need to be convinced of this, however.

    The ego is an illusion with no existence of its own. It appears to be real because of the power it derives from the Atman [Self]. It is animated by the Atman. The ego itself can be compared to dead matter; for without the Atman, it would have no life. Stop supporting the ego, and it will withdraw and disappear. We ourselves lend the unreal ego its reality. Expose it for what it is, or rather, for what it isn't, and that will be the end of it.

    A dog wags its tail—the tail does not wag the dog. If the tail were to wag the dog, it would be disastrous! The same is true with the mind. The mind, or the ego, should be nothing more than a useful tool; a sadhaka [spiritual seeker] shouldn't let him- or herself be ruled by the whims and fancies of the mind.

    The ego consists of our thoughts and our mind. Our thoughts are our own creation. We make them real by cooperating with them. If we withdraw our support, they will dissolve. We simply have to observe our thoughts. The clouds in the sky assume different shapes, and they change constantly. You may see clouds drifting by that look like faces of the gods or different animals or sailing ships. A small child may believe that these shapes are real, but, of course, they are only illusions. In the same way, our ever changing thoughts drift through the mind, which is the ego. They assume different forms, but they are no more real than the shape of a cloud in the sky. If we simply witness our thoughts as they drift by, they will no longer have any effect on us or influence us in any way.

    WIE: What is ego death for the true seeker of moksha [liberation]?

    MA: If the ego is unreal, what death are you talking about? We superimpose the unreal on the real. What really exists is Brahman. There is no discovery, only uncovering.

    WIE: What are the signs of true ego transcendence?

    MA: ...It is difficult to say what a clear sign would be. People pretend or they imitate this and that quality—but for a real master, one who truly doesn't identify with the ego, his or her entire being, and every action, is a pure expression of divine love and self-sacrifice. Divine love and self-sacrifice cannot be imitated.

    WIE: Is it possible for a master to completely annihilate their ego?

    MA: A mahatma [great soul] is one who disidentifies with the ego; they see everything as an extension of the Self. Due to our ignorance, we identify with the ego, with that which is not real, but a mahatma is not identified at all with the ego, with that which is unreal.

    WIE: How does the guru help to annihilate the ego of the disciple?

    MA: A true master creates the situations that will allow the seeker to come out of his or her dream. The disciple wants to continue to sleep and to dream, but the master wants to awaken him or her. The whole effort of the master is to somehow bring the disciple back to the reality of his or her true existence.

    WIE: It is said that the ego will go to any length to maintain its grip on the individual, even masquerading as our own spiritual longing. What are the most important qualities for success in the fight against the endless tricks of the ego?

    MA: Performing one's own dharma with utmost shraddha. Shraddha is very important at the beginning stage on the spiritual path; it is absolutely essential.

    WIE: What is shraddha? Is it faith in the possibility of transcending the ego in this life?

    MA: Shraddha is more than just faith. It is trust and love. Both trust and love are necessary to transcend the ego—trust in the existence of a higher reality, love for that reality and an intense longing to realize it.

    WIE: What is the best way to cultivate discrimination in the face of all the temptations of the ego?

    MA: Just as a little boy grows out of his teddy bear and other toys, a true seeker gains the power to discriminate between the eternal and noneternal as his understanding grows and as he advances along the path. The power of discrimination dawns within us as we gain proper understanding and as we mature. As we learn how to evaluate life's experiences in the proper manner, we automatically begin to use our discriminative intelligence. It is an inner blossoming that takes place—like a bud opening up. It is part of a slow but steady process.

    There is a divine message hidden behind every experience life brings you—both the positive and negative experiences. Just penetrate beneath the surface and you will receive the message. Nothing comes from outside; everything is within you. The whole universe is within you.

    There will be many temptations and challenges along the way. Only an experienced person can help you. The way to moksha is very subtle, and it is easy for a spiritual aspirant to become deluded.

    WIE: What is the role of the spiritual master in guiding the seeker on the path to moksha or liberation?

    MA: If you want to learn how to drive, you need to be taught by an experienced driver. A child needs to be taught how to tie his shoelaces. And how can you learn mathematics without a teacher? Even a pickpocket needs a teacher to teach him the art of stealing. If teachers are indispensable in ordinary life, wouldn't we need a teacher even more on the spiritual path, which is so extremely subtle?

    Though that subtle knowledge is our true nature, we have been identified with the world of names and forms for so long, thinking them to be real. We now need to cease that identification. But in reality, there is nothing to teach. A master simply helps you to complete the journey.
    ...

    On the spiritual journey, we have to really listen to and then contemplate what the master says. We have to be humble in order to receive. When we really listen and then sincerely contemplate, we will assimilate the teachings properly.

    WIE: Why is submission to a guru said to be so important in helping the disciple transcend the ego?

    MA: The seat of the ego is the mind. Any other obstacle can be removed by using the mind except the ego, because the ego is subtler than the mind. It is only through obedience to the one who is established in that supreme experience that one can conquer the ego.

    WIE: You didn't have an external guru, yet you completely transcended your ego. It seems you depended on the formless as your guru to take you all the way.

    MA: Yes, you could say that. But Amma considered the whole of creation to be her guru.

    WIE: Is perfect obedience to the guru ultimately the same as ego death?

    MA: Yes. That is why the satguru [realized spiritual master] is depicted in the Kathopanishad as Yama, the lord of death. The death of the disciple's ego can take place only with the help of a satguru.

    Obedience isn't something that can be forced on the disciple. The disciple is tremendously inspired by the master, who is an embodiment of humility. Obedience and humility simply happen in a true master's presence.

    WIE: It takes rare courage to face ego death.

    MA: Yes, very few can do it. If you have the courage and determination to knock at the door of death, you will find that there is no death. For even death, or the death of the ego, is an illusion.

    ...

    WIE: Since it is possible for spiritual experiences to feed the ego, is it necessary to cultivate purity first?

    MA: There is no need to get obsessed with purity. Focus on your dharma, performing it with the right attitude and with love. Then purity will follow.

    WIE: What is dharma, in the way you are using it?

    MA: Dharma is the right action in the right place at the right time.

    WIE: How can one know what one's dharma is?

    MA: By loving life with the right attitude and having the right understanding, we will know what the right thing to do is. And then, if we perform our dharma, purity will come.

    WIE: How do you cultivate that kind of love?

    MA: Love isn't something that can be cultivated—it's already within us in all its fullness. Life cannot exist without love; they are inseparable. Life and love are not two; they are one and the same. A little bit of the proper channeling of your energies will awaken the love within you.

    You need to have a strong intent to reach the goal of liberation; you need to be focused on that goal. Then such qualities as love, patience, enthusiasm and optimism will spring forth within you. These qualities will work to help you attain your goal.

    WIE: You are revered by so many as the embodiment of unconditional love, and you literally hug everyone who comes to see you. But I have heard that you can also be very fierce with your students. How do these two very different methods of teaching go together?

    MA: For Amma there are not two different methods; Amma has only one method, and that is love. That love manifests as patience and compassion. However, if a deer comes and eats the tender flower buds in your garden, you cannot be gentle with the deer and say softly, "Please deer, don't eat the flowers." You have to shout at it and even wave a stick. It is sometimes necessary to show this type of mood in order to correct the disciple. Kali is the compassionate mother in her disciplining mood. But look into her eyes—there is no anger there.

    Amma only disciplines those who have chosen to stay close to her, and she only does this when they are ready to be disciplined. A disciple is one who is willing to be disciplined. The guru first binds the disciple with boundless, unconditional love so that when the disciple eventually is disciplined, he or she is aware of the presence of that love in all situations.

    Amma helps her children to always be aware and alert. Love has many aspects. When Amma disciplines her children, she does this with the sole purpose of guiding them along the path to help them to fully blossom. This blossoming will happen only if a conducive atmosphere is created. It can never be forced. A true master does not force his or her disciples because pure consciousness cannot force anything. The master is like space, like the boundless sky, and space cannot hurt you. Only the ego can force and hurt. Amma will patiently continue to create opportunities for that inner opening, that blossoming, to take place within her children.

    The guru-disciple relationship is the highest. The bond of love between the guru and shishya [disciple] is so powerful that one may sometimes feel there is no guru and no shishya—all sense of separation disappears.

    WIE: What do you do when the ego takes hold of one of your disciples?

    MA: Amma lovingly helps her children to realize the danger of being under the grip of the ego, and she shows them how to get out of it.

    WIE: Some Western psychotherapists and spiritual teachers believe that we must develop strong egos before we seek ego transcendence. They say that most of us have weak or wounded egos as a result of the emotional and psychological traumas that we have suffered over the course of our lives, and they advocate various forms of therapy to help us build up our character, ego and sense of individuality. You had quite a difficult childhood; you had to bear harsh treatment and even physical abuse, and yet you transcended your ego completely. Would you agree with these teachers that in the pursuit of enlightenment, we first need to build up the ego before we endeavor to transcend it?

    MA: Most people are deeply wounded within in some way, and those wounds have been caused by the past. Those wounds usually remain unhealed. They are wounds not only from this life but from previous lives as well, and no doctor or psychologist can heal them. A doctor or psychologist can help people to cope with life to a certain extent, in spite of those wounds, but they cannot actually heal them. They cannot penetrate deeply enough into their own minds to remove their own wounds, let alone penetrate deeply enough into the patient's mind. Only a true master, who is completely free from any limitations and who is beyond the mind, can penetrate into a person's mind and treat all those unhealed wounds with his or her infinite energy. Spiritual life, especially under the guidance of a satguru, does not weaken the psyche; it strengthens it.

    The ultimate cause of all emotional wounds is our separation from the Atman, from our true nature. It may be necessary for a person to go to a psychologist, and that is fine—but to put spirituality aside in order to first strengthen the ego is to perpetuate that sense of separation, and it will only lead to further suffering. What is the use in thinking, "I will go to the doctor as soon as I feel better"? To wait for either the inner or outer circumstances to be "just right" before we embark on the spiritual journey is like standing on the seashore waiting for the waves to completely subside before we jump into the ocean. This will never happen. Every moment of life is so utterly precious, such a rare opportunity. We should not waste it.

  6. #6

    Re: Saga of the "ego"

    Dear Saidevo:

    Thank you for your response.

    Quote Originally Posted by saidevo
    Could you or your friend provide a link to the discourse or a news publication where she used these words in her discourse?



    This was a verbal Sat-Sangh that was conducted in SF. She spoke only in Malayalam and a Swamiji, her disciple, translated verbatim in English. I am sorry; we cannot provide you with any link as there is none.

    My friend admits that as the discussion session went on, it was clear from her talk that even though the “ego” was unreal in the ultimate sense, it was feeling tremendously real to every seeker who attended the discourse. She was addressing that experience as the basis or a starting point of spiritual journey.

    Amma followed it with a nice example. “The Sun is one in creation but is reflected in million pots. In some pots it is clear and in some it is pale and muddier. These are the pots in which ego takes hold, where veil of the ego has become thicker and therefore, the reflection of the Sun has become paler.

    My friend and I believe that in a Spiritual Sat-Sangh to address a seeker Amma gives very concrete answers by not negating the reality of “ego”. She takes that as a starting point because that is where all seekers begin with. That, in our view, is also clearly demonstrated in her act of hugging, which reinforces duality. While she shows love and compassion in her act of hugging, the very act itself shows, in a true sense, a separation or veil between her and the seeker (two-ness). She feels the need in a seeker, which would not be there if she thinks purely as an Advaitin!

    Amma may be an ambassador of Advaita in her own heart but my friend suggests that in her interaction with spiritual seekers she addresses at levels in which they (seekers) are experiencing reality. To a true guru, realizing the true level at which the seeker is and addressing that in terms of his or her spiritual journey is the main goal.

    Notwithstanding her great writings, we believe she is starkly not an Advaitin when it comes to addressing a seeker where ego is very real, which is also what I have been emphasizing in all my discussions (my famous (or not-so famous) first step).

    Blessings,

  7. #7
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    India
    Posts
    4,193
    Rep Power
    369

    Re: Saga of the "ego"

    Quote Originally Posted by nirotu View Post
    Dear Saidevo:

    -----
    Notwithstanding her great writings, we believe she is starkly not an Advaitin when it comes to addressing a seeker where ego is very real, which is also what I have been emphasizing in all my discussions (my famous (or not-so famous) first step).

    Blessings,
    Namaste Nirotu,

    The earlier confusion of mine was due to use of 'accept' in place of 'except'. I think I understand it correctly now?

    WRT to above quote, one cannot be in advaita being in prakriti. Even Iswara, though he is controller of Prakriti, is not Advaita from within prakriti. So, Krishna while teaching is Dvaita, knowing well that dvaita serves a purpose of Vak alone.

    Gurus have given example of how camphor burns itself without residue. Similar is said to be the saga of Ego dissoving itself. And for this purpose, the self less work, worship, and sadhana are recommended.

    Your famous or infamous first step will never happen if even a bit of ego remains -- someday or on some occassion, the ego will rear its ugly head and destroy all gains. Whereas, true and final surrender is Samadhi and complete dissolution of ego, which cannot happen without the experience that the ego is bhandasur (fake demon).

    Only ONE Ego called Mahat is upheld. Even then, Mahat does not exist without the True being's existence.

    Any way, ----------------

    Om
    That which is without letters (parts) is the Fourth, beyond apprehension through ordinary means, the cessation of the phenomenal world, the auspicious and the non-dual. Thus Om is certainly the Self. He who knows thus enters the Self by the Self.

  8. #8

    Re: Saga of the "ego"

    Quote Originally Posted by Atanu Banerjee
    WRT to above quote, one cannot be in advaita being in prakriti. Even Iswara, though he is controller of Prakriti, is not Advaita from within prakriti.
    Atanu, it is gratifying to note the agreement between us. Yes, “even Iswara, though He is the controller of Prakriti, is not Advaita from within Prakriti.” This is the tune over which we have been dancing around all this time through many and many posts. You have answered my age old question and that is, in the manifest creation (Prakriti) it is impossible to hold singular awareness anymore. Such a transcendental awareness can only come when you are in Turiya. Therefore, if you now agree that the creation indeed has occurred, what makes any mortal think he is in Advaita in creation? Remember, we are not talking about the starting point and the end-point of soul’s journey, which is decidedly Advaita but in creation the duality has come into existence that cannot be and must not be denied. We went through several posts just to agree with the above statement!!!!! Amen to that!!!

    This point has been recognized well by Amma, although an Advaitin by heart, when she made such a statement (OP).

    Quote Originally Posted by Atanu Banerjee
    Gurus have given example of how camphor burns itself without residue. Similar is said to be the saga of Ego dissolving itself. And for this purpose, the self less work, worship, and sadhana are recommended.
    I have never denied the use of Sadhana, worship and self-less work. These are all necessary tools but, given the tenacious hold of the ego, we are simply cautioning to beware of the starting step. Just like in any race (running race, bicycle race etc), the starting phase at the sound of the buzzer is very crucial that determines pretty much the outcome. Similarly, in our spiritual journey or race we need to be careful about that starting point! That starting point is appropriately called “holding the hand of grace” so that the tenacious ego does not get a chance to own the spiritual practices as its own. As spiritual journey progresses you will naturally continue to use tools like Sadhanas, worship etc. I consider the ability to use these tools is the logical outcome of this grace working for us. Such a person will always do "good" and "persist in doing good".

    While Advaitins may consider ego as transient (illusion) and may see it dissolve in “Oneness” but, the tenacious hold of the ego cannot be denied. Moreover, to dissolve something assumes something exists. Metaphorically speaking, the tentacles of Octopus have a very strong grip that needs to be cut asunder, neither by simply negating it, nor by denying it but, by realizing its existence and overcoming its power.

    Quote Originally Posted by Atanu Banerjee
    Your famous or infamous first step will never happen if even a bit of ego remains -- someday or on some occasion, the ego will rear its ugly head and destroy all gains.

    I agree with your response but like it more with a qualification and that is; “The first step will not happen if you allow ego to rule over your self”. You are saying that the first-step will not happen as long as ego takes hold, but a man can bypass that hold through the level of simple knowingness of the “grace” just like having a natural consciousness during the waking state. Upon waking, a simple knowingness with which one knows one’s name and, I submit, that level of simple knowing of grace is needed at the first step.

    More importantly, I do get a sense that “ego” in your view or any advaitin’s view has been compared to evil or maya. They seem to paint a picture of the ego in such a way that it always prevents you from realizing your true self. Respectfully, I beg to differ. Don’t you think such a description of ego gives it (ego) a bad rap?

    You may or may not agree with me but this is how I view “ego”. I do consider ego as a necessary tool in man’s life that allows him to aspire to reach the higher plane by navigating the world. I have an ego, as do all individuals on this HDF. I do consider it a valuable part of who we are, which separates one from the other. While, in the spiritual realm there is no such separation exists, in the material world separation does exist between individuals, which is very valuable for the individual that allows one to acquire skills to learn and live with others around.

    Having said that, I also believe that ego is not bad if kept at its rightful place! The ego functions best when it is in harmony with the whole–self. Those who are in touch with their higher-self find ego not as a threat but truly a vehicle to serve the higher–self.

    A Swamiji once said ( I am sorry, I do not know his name) and I quote, “The problem arises only when ego gets out of control and the higher self begins to fall under the leadership of the ego! Then, it is almost as if the ego is the self playfully pretending to be the separate entity called “I.” We keep our egos in check when we continually nurture our awareness of who we really are. Then our egos are free to serve without trying ineffectually to rule.”

    Back to "OP", I would be interested in your opinion regarding the truth in Amma’s statement.

    Blessings,

  9. #9
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    India
    Posts
    4,193
    Rep Power
    369

    Re: Saga of the "ego"

    Quote Originally Posted by nirotu View Post
    Atanu, it is gratifying to note the agreement between us. Yes, “even Iswara, though He is the controller of Prakriti, is not Advaita from within Prakriti.” This is the tune over which we have been dancing around all this time through many and many posts. You have answered my age old question and that is, in the manifest creation (Prakriti) it is impossible to hold singular awareness anymore. -
    Namaskar,

    Actually there has been no dancing around ---- of course I do not know about you.


    If it was impossible to experience Advaita, then scriptures would have said so.


    Om Namah Shivayya
    That which is without letters (parts) is the Fourth, beyond apprehension through ordinary means, the cessation of the phenomenal world, the auspicious and the non-dual. Thus Om is certainly the Self. He who knows thus enters the Self by the Self.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    India
    Posts
    4,193
    Rep Power
    369

    Re: Saga of the "ego"

    Quote Originally Posted by nirotu View Post
    -----
    A Swamiji once said ( I am sorry, I do not know his name) and I quote, “The problem arises only when ego gets out of control and the higher self begins to fall under the leadership of the ego! -----
    Blessings,

    It is interesting to note.

    It is foolish to assume that higher self will ever begin to fall.

    Om
    That which is without letters (parts) is the Fourth, beyond apprehension through ordinary means, the cessation of the phenomenal world, the auspicious and the non-dual. Thus Om is certainly the Self. He who knows thus enters the Self by the Self.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •