Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 43

Thread: Call to Vaishnavas-Human life is not made for pleasure!!!!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    Italy
    Age
    36
    Posts
    651
    Rep Power
    231

    Call to Vaishnavas-Human life is not made for pleasure!!!!

    Namaste all.
    I am really surprised to read what Shri Satay,who recognize him-self as a vaishnava,wrote:
    Anyway, isn't there some mention of a liquid called 'Soma' somewhere in our scriptures? What the heck is 'soma'? Why devas drink this 'soma'? Why indra is talked about having dancing girls around in swarga?

    So devas can have girls, pleasure, sex drink soma but mere mortals can not eh? What the heck kind of logic is that?

    Hypocrisy as usual...


    Dear Satay,please note that the human life form has to be used for spiritual realization in order to obtain Moksha.Devas are made for a life of pleasure.
    Please read Srimad Bhagavata Purana,Canto 7,Chapter 6.By http://www.srimadbhagavatam.org/canto7/chapter6.html
    (1) S'rî Prahlâda said: 'From one's childhood on should a person of intelligence practice the dharma of devotional service unto the Lord [as described in 7.5.23-24]; to be born in this human life is a temporary thing rarely achieved that is suffused with meaning. (2) That way [of meaning] indeed is of a living being here the approaching of the feet of Vishnu because this concerns the dearest and best one of all alive, the Master of the Soul [see also 3.25.38 and B.G. 5.29,]. (3) By divine ordinance is happiness to the sensual, o daitya's, everywhere available to all entities united with a material body, just as there is the unhappiness without one asking for it. (4) For that there is no need to endeavor, one would only waste one's life, and there is no need either to lust about it; the ultimate goal of life are the lotus feet of Mukunda [the Lord of Liberation]. (5) Therefore should a person of reflection as long as he [from old age] is not of failure, still being stout and strong, be after the real benefit of [Mukunda in] having a material life in a human body. (6) Of the hundred years that every person has for his life is a person in service of his senses indeed wasting half of his time as one sleeps half the day in ignorance being engulfed in darkness. (7) In one's childhood one is naive, as a boy one is playing and thus twenty years do pass and another twenty years pass being unable when one physically is incapacitated of old age. (8) And bewildered by formidable material lusts that can never be satisfied is the one overly attached to family matters madly wasting the remainder of his life. (9) What man attached to his household who, with hands and feet bound by the ropes of affection, is out of control with his senses, is able to free himself [see 1.2: 6-7]? (10) Who, indeed thinking that to make money is more desirable than to live [in devotion and gratitude], would be able to give up that acquisition for which merchant, thief and public servant risk their dear lives? (11-13) How can one give up on associating privately with one's loving wife so pleasing, not support with wisdom the family bound by their affection or what person would not be attracted to the prattle of children? With one's sons and married daughters, brothers, sisters and depending parents enshrined in one's heart, with all the household matters of very nice furniture, a good income and all the pets and the groups of servants and maidservants connected with the family, how can one give up; like a silkworm is one greedily occupied with all kinds of activities in desires that can never be satisfied considering the genitals and tongue the most important; how can such a massive illusion be forsaken? (14) Not for his lifetime does he understand to desist from the maintenance of his family; maddened spoiling the true purpose, at all fronts being distressed the threefold way [see 2.10: 8], has he no regrets about simply enjoying the family. (15) With a mind set on wealth and known with the fault of cheating out here for the money he nevertheless after having died is tied to this material world [by Yamarâja taking rebirth again] as he, too fond of his kin, never in peace with his desires, was out stealing in having no control over his senses. (16) Although knowing about it, o sons of Danu, is one busy with providing the greater family indeed not capable of understanding one's true self in entering the darkness of just like animals being estranged in a mine and thine conception of life. (17-18) Because never, anyone, wherever or whenever with a poor fund of knowledge will get any better in the art of liberating himself from looking after the lust being a sexual plaything and from being someone from whose bondage families expand, must you, my daitya friends in this keep yourselves far away from hiding with the demon that is too addicted to sensual pleasure; instead one should approach Lord Nârâyana, the original godhead, who by the association of the liberated lays out the desired path of liberation. (19) It is truly no great endeavor to satisfy the Infallible One, o asura sons, because in this world of all beings so close to the soul each and every respect is already established.

    I am a brahmachary.
    Please read what Srimad Bhagavata Purana,Canto 7,Chapter 12 says about Brahmacharys.
    (7) He, not belonging to the householders life, must, to the as good as invincible senses that even take away the mind of a renunciate, give it up to address women with the observance of the great vow of celibacy [the yama of ashthânga-yoga]. (8) To brush the hair, massage the body, to bathe and rub it in with oil is something that the still young wife of the guru should never be allowed to do as a service if the adept is still young [see also 1.11:29]. (9) Especially the bewildered worship [of her] is like fire to the pot of butter that a man is; with other women, even with his own daughter, should he, living in seclusion, not associate more than is needed. (10)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    Italy
    Age
    36
    Posts
    651
    Rep Power
    231
    Now please read what Lord Krishna says to Uddhava in Srimad Bhagavata Purana,Canto 11,Chapter 14:
    (29) Giving up being intimate with women [to have sex with them, with others or otherwise] and keeping far from the company of womanizers should one, mastering the self, sit at ease in seclusion and with great care concentrate on Me.(30) No other attachment gives a man as much suffering and bondage like the attachment to women and the association of those attached to women.

    Now Chapter 17:
    (33) With [sexually receptive] women, or sex-minded living beings, glancing, touching, conversing and joking and such is the first thing that someone not keeping a household [the sannyâsî, the vânaprastha and the brahmacârî] should forsake [see 11.14: 29 and 6.1: 56-68].

    Now read what Manu writes in Manu Smrti.I use the translation at http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/manu/manu02.htm
    213. It is the nature of women to seduce men in this (world); for that reason the wise are never unguarded in (the company of) females.
    214. For women are able to lead astray in (this) world not only a fool, but even a learned man, and (to make) him a slave of desire and anger.
    215. One should not sit in a lonely place with one's mother, sister, or daughter; for the senses are powerful, and master even a learned man.


    Regards,
    Orlando.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    mrityuloka
    Age
    52
    Posts
    3,729
    Rep Power
    337
    Dear Orlando,
    Now that you dumped all this stuff on me...it suddenly makes sense...
    satay

  4. #4
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    mrityuloka
    Age
    52
    Posts
    3,729
    Rep Power
    337
    Quote Originally Posted by Bhakta of God
    Now please read what Lord Krishna says to Uddhava in Srimad Bhagavata Purana,Canto 11,Chapter 14:
    (29) Giving up being intimate with women [to have sex with them, with others or otherwise] and keeping far from the company of womanizers should one, mastering the self, sit at ease in seclusion and with great care concentrate on Me.(30) No other attachment gives a man as much suffering and bondage like the attachment to women and the association of those attached to women.

    Now Chapter 17:
    (33) With [sexually receptive] women, or sex-minded living beings, glancing, touching, conversing and joking and such is the first thing that someone not keeping a household [the sannyâsî, the vânaprastha and the brahmacârî] should forsake [see 11.14: 29 and 6.1: 56-68].

    Now read what Manu writes in Manu Smrti.I use the translation at http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/manu/manu02.htm
    213. It is the nature of women to seduce men in this (world); for that reason the wise are never unguarded in (the company of) females.
    214. For women are able to lead astray in (this) world not only a fool, but even a learned man, and (to make) him a slave of desire and anger.
    215. One should not sit in a lonely place with one's mother, sister, or daughter; for the senses are powerful, and master even a learned man.


    Regards,
    Orlando.
    Dear Orlando,
    Are you sure that Bhagwan said that about Women? Wouldn't it just make sense to not make women at all if they cauase so much trouble to men?

    This sounds like written by some over zealous men and not by Bhagwan himself.
    satay

  5. #5
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    mrityuloka
    Age
    52
    Posts
    3,729
    Rep Power
    337
    By the way, no where in your dump it says anything about why devas can have all this pleasure and not men.

    Why are devas made for pleasure?
    satay

  6. #6
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    Italy
    Age
    36
    Posts
    651
    Rep Power
    231
    Namaste.
    Dear Satay you told me:
    Dear Orlando,
    Are you sure that Bhagwan said that about Women? Wouldn't it just make sense to not make women at all if they cauase so much trouble to men?

    This sounds like written by some over zealous men and not by Bhagwan himself.


    I am sure that Shri Bhagavan said that.Please browse http://www.srimadbhagavatam.org and read the verses.

    The followings are the two verses 29 and 30 of Srimad Bhagavata Purana,Canto 11,Chapter 14 in the original (sanskrit) language:
    29.strīṇāḿ strī-sańgināḿ sańgaḿ
    tyaktvā dūrata ātmavān
    kṣeme vivikta āsīnaś
    cintayen mām atandritaḥ
    30.na tathāsya bhavet kleśo
    bandhaś cānya-prasańgataḥ
    yoṣit-sańgād yathā puḿso
    yathā tat-sańgi-sańgataḥ


    Now please read the ISKCON translation.
    By http://www.srimadbhagavatam.com/11/14/29/en
    Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Śrīmad Bhāgavatam 11.14.29

    strīṇāḿ strī-sańgināḿ sańgaḿ

    tyaktvā dūrata ātmavān

    kṣeme vivikta āsīnaś

    cintayen mām atandritaḥ

    SYNONYMS

    strīṇām — of women; strī — to women; sańginām — of those who are attached or intimately associated; sańgam — association; tyaktvā — giving up; dūrataḥ — far away; ātma-vān — being conscious of the self; kṣeme — fearless; vivikte — in a separated or isolated place; āsīnaḥ — sitting; cintayet — one should concentrate; mām — on Me; atandritaḥ — with great care.

    TRANSLATION

    Being conscious of the eternal self, one should give up association with women and those intimately associated with women. Sitting fearlessly in a solitary place, one should concentrate the mind on Me with great attention.


    By http://www.srimadbhagavatam.com/11/14/30/en
    Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Śrīmad Bhāgavatam 11.14.30

    na tathāsya bhavet kleśo

    bandhaś cānya-prasańgataḥ

    yoṣit-sańgād yathā puḿso

    yathā tat-sańgi-sańgataḥ

    SYNONYMS

    na — not; tathā — like that; asya — of him; bhavet — could be; kleśaḥ — suffering; bandhaḥ — bondage; ca — and; anya-prasańgataḥ — from any other attachment; yoṣit — of women; sańgāt — from attachment; yathā — just as; puḿsaḥ — of a man; yathā — similarly; tat — to women; sańgi — of those attached; sańgataḥ — from the association.

    TRANSLATION

    Of all kinds of suffering and bondage arising from various attachments, none is greater than the suffering and bondage arising from attachment to women and intimate contact with those attached to women.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    Italy
    Age
    36
    Posts
    651
    Rep Power
    231
    However,in the third chapter of Manu Smrti,Manu says:
    55. Women must be honoured and adorned by their fathers, brothers, husbands, and brothers-in-law, who desire (their own) welfare.

    56. Where women are honoured, there the gods are pleased; but where they are not honoured, no sacred rite yields rewards.

    57. Where the female relations live in grief, the family soon wholly perishes; but that family where they are not unhappy ever prospers.

    58. The houses on which female relations, not being duly honoured, pronounce a curse, perish completely, as if destroyed by magic.

    59. Hence men who seek (their own) welfare, should always honour women on holidays and festivals with (gifts of) ornaments, clothes, and (dainty) food.

    60. In that family, where the husband is pleased with his wife and the wife with her husband, happiness will assuredly be lasting.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    mrityuloka
    Age
    52
    Posts
    3,729
    Rep Power
    337
    What did Bhagwan "do" when he was here 5000 years ago.

    Did he follow these principles you outlined?
    Did he shun women? Did he have no contact with women?
    satay

  9. #9
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    Italy
    Age
    36
    Posts
    651
    Rep Power
    231
    Namaste.
    Please note that Lord Krishna is God Him-self.He doesn't need to follow these rules.The Master can break His own rules but not the disciple.
    I hope you already know about Rasa-dance.
    Please read Srimad Bhagavata Purana,Canto 10,chapter 33:
    (27-28) S'rî Parîkchit said: 'To establish the dharma and to subdue the ones defiant, descended indeed He, the Supreme Lord, the Controller of the Universe with His plenary portion [Balarâma]; how could He, the original speaker, executor and protector of the codes of moral conduct, behave to the contrary o brahmin, touching the wives of others? (29) What did He, so self-satisfied, have in mind with this assuredly contemptible performance, o best of the vowed, please dispel our doubt about this.'

    (30) S'rî S'uka said: 'The transgression of dharma and thoughtlessness, as can be seen with controllers of spiritual potency, does not, as with an all-consuming fire [staying the same], mean they are at fault. (31) Someone not in control sure mustn't even think of ever doing a thing like this; such a one, acting out of foolishness, would be destroyed like one not being Rudra would be with [drinking] the poison from the ocean [see 8.7]. (32) True are the words of the ones in control [with the Lord, with themselves] and what they do should by people of intelligence [only] sometimes be performed, doing of them that which is in accord with what they said [see also B.G. e.g. 3: 6-7, 3:42, 5:7]. (33) For them does by their pious activity [religious excercises] the benefit for themselves not accrue nor will there for those free from false ego [acting] to the opposite be the undesirable reactions, my best. (34) How then can we in connection with the Controller of those who are controlled - all the created beings, animals, human beings and denizens of heaven - speak of right or wrong? (35) The sages, whose bondage of karma by serving the dust of the lotusfeet has all been washed away, are satisfied by the power of yoga and act freely, they, of Him, never get entangled; were indeed would the bondage be of them who to His will have accepted bodies transcendental? [see vapu]. (36) He who within the gopîs and their husbands, indeed within all embodied beings, lives as the Supreme Witness, has assumed His form to sport in this world. (37) Assuming a humanlike body to show His mercy to His devotees, does He accept such pastimes of which one hearing about becomes dedicated to Him.


    Please note that we have just follow the rules of the scriptures.But we must NOT try to imitate Lord Krishna's past-times.


    This material universe is God's playground.He can do what He wants.But we human beings have to follow the shastric rules.
    Regards,
    Orlando.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    mrityuloka
    Age
    52
    Posts
    3,729
    Rep Power
    337
    right...I forgot that we are just "puppets"
    satay

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •