neo Tantric thread

[Bob G]

Hello Satay,

Just wondering that if you felt the need to close that thread, why didn't you also edit or remove the part that made you feel the need to close it? Did you leave it as a graphic (although written) example of that which is not appropiate for minors...yet where minors can or may still come across it?

Btw., I feel this is the same kind of dubious and potentially dangerous material Osho was really into while under the guise of a spiritual mantle, which in his case (imo) was really nothing more than his co-opting (stealing) of everything under the sun to appear so.

Good day
Om

[satay]

Hello Bob G,

I left the inappropriate post there and it will remain there like that for a couple of days before I remove it. As a mod, I have learnt to not 'rush' into editing/deleting members' posts even if the posts in my opinion might be breaking rules unless the posts in question absolutely threaten members or hacking attempts onthe site.

This gap time also allows for other members to voice their opinions on mod decisions (in this case just me) before the posts actually get edited/deleted. If I just do it i.e. edit any post there is no way to bring it back to its original text.

Thanks,

[Znanna]

Namaste,

Understanding that the physical is a poor man's representation of the holy can be useful, IMO.

That said, I hardly thing that HDF is in need of sex tips for the unenlightened!





ZN

[sarabhanga]

Namaste Satay,

The post is entirely inappropriate, and I would guess that it was deliberately posted to spoil your previous effort to remove overt sexual references from our front page.

This post has surely been increasing the chance of inappropriate Ads, while at the same time you have been testing and trying to adjust the Ad system ~ I should have sent you a PM rather than commenting openly.

Some time has passed, and the re-editing has made little difference. The whole post is nothing but puerile nonsense that would be considered offensive by many of our readers, and it should be swiftly deleted.

[satay]

Hello all,
I have moved Yajvan and SM's posts from the neo tantra thread to this new thread http://www.hindudharmaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2494

We can continue the discussion about Tantra there. All inappropriate posts will be deleted as usual.

Thanks,

[yajvan]

Hari Om
~~~~~~

Namaste,

skhandelwal writes,

Can someone tell me specifically how to achieve liberation through sex?

sarabhanga writes from a different post,

saMdhya (saM-dhya) indicates “being on the point of junction” or “based on saMdhi”; and also “thinking out, reflecting or meditating”.

Now how are these two connected?

By saMdhya upasana and experiencing the gap. This 'saMdhya' is considered a junction point in time, and upasana or sadhana, one can experince this gap. Why bother? What happens with this gap or junction?


It is a place where turiya¹ can shine through (without getting technical). This is this unblemished level of Being, of Fullness. The basis of Liberation or Kevalya.

So with relationships, shakti-samgama, this gap also can be found. I will leave it to your reading and study to take this method forward.
If one looks to the Vijῆāna Bhairava tantra, karaka 71, this method is discussed. This is only 1 of 112 ways to approach this gap, via dharana , or upasana.



pranams

1. Turiya , consider these posts: http://www.hindudharmaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1822
Gaps -
A. http://www.hindudharmaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2337
B. http://www.hindudharmaforums.com/showthread.php?t=622
C. Search on gaps also