Prophet Mohammad saw is mentioned in Hindu Holy books

[MahaHrada]

Namaste MahaHrada,

Why would you say it doesn't fit the "semitic tribes"... ??

Subham.

Namaste TTA,
Because of the semitic tribes very different religious, cultural, linguistic and genetic and spatial origins.

The celtic and the the vedic culture, religion language and spatial origin share many similarities also genetics are close related.

Excerpt Wikipedia
The term Semite means a member of any of various ancient and modern peoples originating in southwestern Asia, including Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, Arabs, and Ethiopian Semites.
The hypothetical Proto-Semitic language, ancestral to historical Semitic languages in the Middle East, is thought to have been originally from either the Arabian Peninsula (particularly around Yemen) or the adjacent Ethiopian highlands, but its region of origin is still much debated and uncertain. The Semitic language family is also considered a component of the larger Afro-Asiatic macro-family of languages. Identification of the hypothetical proto-Semitic region of origin is therefore dependent on the larger geographic distributions of the other language families within Afro-Asiatic.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic#Origin

On the celts and the Hindus
Excerpt:


The Celts weren't the only Indo-Europeans settling the European idyll. Balts, Slavs, Germans and Nordics nestled in-all the way north to the frozen scrags of Iceland. They each radiated a language, spiritual mindset and culture that tracks that of the early Vedic. At dawn, Germans daily slipped into cold, sacred rivers for ablution, chanting and wearing loose-flowing robes and a topknot in their long hair "so emblematic of the brahmins." So recorded Tacitus, the adventurer Greek historian. The Slavs took seven steps around a holy fire in marriage.

The Celts were a complex, spiritual, vivacious, artistic, business-smart people speaking an Indo-European language much like Sanskrit , German or Greek, grouped into socially sophisticated tribes that fanned across Europe 3-4 millennia ago and leapt to Britain and Ireland-from eire, a Celtic Goddess overlighting land.

http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archive...994-5-17.shtml

MahaHrada

[rcscwc]

see what Quran says that All the books that was given to rishi,s was for that time and it is the time of quran then you hindu,s have to beleive in quran becoz your veda porna etc speaks about Mohmmad saw. i request you to read quran brother thanks.And if u will say that Mohammad saw was a Hindu it is not correct daer Mohammad saw is also mentioned in Bible of christians in old tetment of jewish.

So, even koran was given by the very God which gave Vedas. After all, Vedas are the first, even you admit it. If Mo is predicted then he has to be a Hindu, nothing else.

Give up your false God and come back to the first True Book ie Vedas.

Hai first of all let me make very clear that i am a muslim.
2 Mohammad saw is even mentioned in christians bible jewish,s old testment and Buddha book.
what i am trying to you that Bible veda purana old testment was also given to the Rishi by God on that time.But as all books veda puranan bible mentioned that you have to beleive in antim rishi and his mesege Quran.i beleive that books before Quran was came by God but know it is the rime of antim rishi Mohammad saw. so way you not beleive in Muhmmmad saw and Quran

What muddled up thinking. First decide what Mo is, where he is prophecied. Did Buddhist books too prophecied him? What about Jain and Parsi scriptures?

Hmmm. Bahais too make similar claims about Bahaiullah.

[chandu_69]

As per Bhavishya Purana Mohammad was a demon.

Bhavishya Puran: Prati Sarg: Part III:3,3 5-27

Suta Goswami said: After hearing the king’s prayers, Lord Shiva said: O king Bhojaraja, you should go to the place called Mahakakshvara, that land is called Vahika and now is being contaminated by the mlecchas. In that terrible country there no longer exists dharma. There was a mystic demon named Tripura(Tripurasura), whom I have already burnt to ashes, he has come again by the order of Bali. He has no origin but he achieved a benediction from me. His name is Mahamada(Muhammad) and his deeds are like that of a ghost. Therefore, O king, you should not go to this land of the evil ghost.

So, as per Bhavishya purana muhammad was an evil Ghost

See the original sanskrit here at.
http://bhavishyapuran.blogspot.com/2...iction-of.html

[chandu_69]

Next comes Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) Prophesised in Atharvaveda:

Let us see the verse:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/av/av20127.htm


The whole chapter is Talking about King Parikshit
and a Rishi.

Unlike muhammad Rishis don't Kill and take their women as spoils of war(Quran 008.067:It is not for any prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land...)

King Parikshit was a resident of Bharat not Arabia and the word Kaurama has no specific meaning in sanskrit at the best stretching of imagination it may refer to Kaurava lineage.

And Kuntap doesnt mean Makkah or Bakkah or Bokka(Lol)

[chandu_69]

Now comes Atharvaveda Book XX Hymn 21
Here is again a crude translation:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/av/av20021.htm

The whole page is talking about INDRA the keeper of celestial heaven.
Incidentally Allah of Quran also is the keeper of heaven who supplies Virgin girls.


Line 6 Mentions Vritra who was killed by Indra.

Line 6:These our libations, strength inspiring Soma draughts, gladdened
thee in the fight with Vritra, Hero-Lord,
Line 7:What time thou slewest for the singer with trimmed grass ten
thousand Vritras, thou resistless in thy might..

No mention of Human being leave alone Muhammed.

[chandu_69]

Next is Rigveda Book I, Hymn 53 verse 9
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv01053.htm


Once again the entire Hymn is talking about Indra
here is Verse 9: With all-outstripping chariot-wheel, O Indra, thou far-famed, hast overthrown the twice ten Kings of men, With sixty thousand nine-and-ninety followers, who came in arms to fight with friendless Suśravas.

//Indra is protecting Susravas from those Kings who came with sixty thousand nine-and-ninety followers ..read the next verse//

10 Thou hast protected Suśravas with succour, and Tūrvayāṇa with thine aid, O Indra. Thou madest Kutsa, Atithigva, Āyu, subject unto this King, the young, the mighty.

The stupid Zakir Naik wrongly assumes that the "sixty thousand nine-and-ninety followers" are fighting for Indra but the reverse is the case.Indra is fighting Against sixty thousand nine-and-ninety fellows