Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Apastambha sutras

  1. #11
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    mrityuloka
    Age
    52
    Posts
    3,729
    Rep Power
    337

    Re: Apastambha sutras

    Who is 'most'?
    satay

  2. Re: Apastambha sutras

    Satay
    Iam not sure if there were some vegetarians, but iam sure that most of the kings,bhrahmins were non vegetarians, thats the reason i said most..

  3. #13

    Re: Apastambha sutras

    Could you please tell us how you came on that conclusion?

  4. Re: Apastambha sutras

    I came to that conclusion because, I read myself the apastambha sutras that says what meats to eat on what days by brahmins.

  5. #15

    Re: Apastambha sutras

    Namaste Ramesh.

    First of all one must understand that Smriti texts, like the Apastambha Sutras are always secondary in authority to Sruti texts like the Vedas.If they contradict Sruti these texts are not considered to be authentic Vedic texts, and are disregarded, or the particular contradicting verse is seen as a later interpolation, and disregarded. Now, as to whether Sruti texts permit meat eating is a bit of debate. To give you an alternate view about the nature of Vedic sacrifices that supposedly involve meat, I'd read through this link- http://www.aryasamaj.org/eng_art/A_c...erstanding.htm

  6. #16
    Join Date
    March 2006
    Location
    Govinda Lokam
    Age
    45
    Posts
    738
    Rep Power
    356

    Re: Apastambha sutras

    How can a person claiming to do Yoga whose first yama rule is ahiMsa eat meat? No Yogis of the past ate meat. You should eat plants only if you should. Advanced yogis subsist on just air and divine energy - read the story of Dhruva where he cuts on his food one by one - initially light plant food, then only water, then only air and then only on the cosmic energy. You can eat meat certainly but dont claim yourself to be a prospective sAdhaka. If you are so cruel as to kill animals to satisfy your taste buds then how is it that you obtain a tranquil mind which demands love of all creatures and mankind? And how do you kill a creature you love? With plants you have no choice because you have to live.

    The scriptures have tAmasic, rAjasik and sAttvik meanings. They are meant for different adhikArins. Most of the vedic scripture is allegorical in nature and using the veda to support non vegetarianism is a tAmasik interpretation. That is akin to some followers of quran using the quran to bomb planes and cities.

    Some of the himsa yajnas were done by pUrva mImAmsakas who expected to get heaven by 'killing the animals'. I think those who killed animals for such purposes went only to the hell instead - andhaM tamaH pravishanti ye.avidyaamupaasate. Vedanta supercedes pUrva mImAmsa and is above the ignorant karma kANda practices of the mImAmsakas. ( and hence has no place for ignorant ritual killings).
    Guard your Dharma, Burn the Myth, Promote the Truth, Crush the superstition.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •