Re: B.G in the context of Maha-Bharat
Originally Posted by
kd gupta
Namaste Atanuji
I did not understand your post , people asked Swami Ramsukhdasji that there is criticism of Vedas in gita , he replied , there is criticism of sakam devotees and not the one . You can see the devotion in previous threads as below…
Lord Krishna is the original Vishnu.
MahaVishnu is an expansion of Narayan---Narayan is an expansion of Balarama ---Balarama is an expansion of his Brother Krishna. Krishna is Srimati Radharani's...
What Krsn says…..
Iti te jnaanamaakhyaatam guhyaad guhyataram mayaa;
Vimrishyaitadasheshena yathecchasi tathaa kuru.
Thus has wisdom more secret than secrecy itself been declared unto thee by Me; having
reflected over it fully, then act thou as thou wishest.
You know this was not the Final .
Namaste
You are correct. Actually, in Svet.Upanishad it is said that one who does not understand the Supreme is not equipped to be benefitted by Veda. When one is not free of kAma, one does not reflect on scripture with a transparent mind. The kAma gets superimposed on the scripture, which is water -- pure.
For example: While showing the Visvarupa to Arjuna, Shri Krishna says: See these ----. See also what else you wish to see.
An American, most likely, will not see a dhoti clad Vishnu-Aditya or an elephant hide clad Rudra in visvarupa.
-----------------------------
Whatever is in one's consciousness, that is true since consciousness is true.
Regards
Om Namah Shivaya
Last edited by atanu; 17 September 2009 at 11:24 PM.
That which is without letters (parts) is the Fourth, beyond apprehension through ordinary means, the cessation of the phenomenal world, the auspicious and the non-dual. Thus Om is certainly the Self. He who knows thus enters the Self by the Self.
Bookmarks