Pranam EM
What can this old fool report back, have you not heard it’s the curiosity that killed the cat, my anti virus got the better of me, this old fool could not risk it so I am afraid nought to report. Frankly I could rely on your experience more, then anyone who claims to have all the answers without elaborating jack.
Jai Shree Krishna
Rig Veda list only 33 devas, they are all propitiated, worthy off our worship, all other names of gods are derivative from this 33 originals,
Bhagvat Gita; Shree Krishna says Chapter 3.11 devan bhavayatanena te deva bhavayantu vah parasparam bhavayantah sreyah param avapsyatha Chapter 17.4 yajante sattvika devan yaksa-raksamsi rajasah pretan bhuta-ganams canye yajante tamasa janah
The world disappears in him. He is the peaceful, the good, the one without a second.
Vanakkam GP:
Ah, but I am a fool.
Who is this elaborating Jack you talk about? Is he like elaborating Yajvan, or elaborating Saidevo?
Actually you made me chuckle as I don't think I've ever heard anyone from India use this idiom.
Aum namasivaya
Pranam EM
now now why bring Yajvan ji and Saidevo ji, when you know who is the wise one on this thread.
By the way what ever gave you the idea that i am from India?
Jai Shree Krishna
Rig Veda list only 33 devas, they are all propitiated, worthy off our worship, all other names of gods are derivative from this 33 originals,
Bhagvat Gita; Shree Krishna says Chapter 3.11 devan bhavayatanena te deva bhavayantu vah parasparam bhavayantah sreyah param avapsyatha Chapter 17.4 yajante sattvika devan yaksa-raksamsi rajasah pretan bhuta-ganams canye yajante tamasa janah
The world disappears in him. He is the peaceful, the good, the one without a second.
GP: So sorry for the assumption. With a name like Ganeshprasad, I should have guessed you were from jolly England. Right along there with the MacTavish, Smiths, and Windsors, its a right proper British namesake, isn't it?
A pint o' Guiness then, mate. Please accept me sincerest apologies.
So Chelsea's 'avin' a mighty fine year, then?
Cheers, my Matey.
I haven't read the rest of the thread regarding this, but I know that in the Gaudiya Vaishnava sampradaya, Bhaktivinoda Thakura in passing regards Muhammad as the Supreme Teacher of Sakhya Rasa (mood of friendship) towards the Lord.
"In the age of Dvapara, Uddhava and Arjuna became the qualified authorities of sakhya rasa. They preached this rasa throughout the world. Gradually tha rasa expanded up to the Arabian countries and touched the heart of Mohammed, the knower of religious principles."
-- Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura
And of course, Srila Prabhupada has said immensely that the Qur'an is also shastra, that Islam is also Vaishnavism (albeit a 'corrupted' form, like all later religions), and that Allah is another name for Krishna, God.
Islam can't be Vaishanvism, they don't accept Vishnu to begin with (not mentioning all the questionable acts sanctioned by Qu'ran according to muslims themselves).
Of course any religious inclination (whatever it be) points to the same, not the same that as another religion, but to the same archetypal religious tendency, it's a nice blanket statement to avoid arguments and make everybody happy in the end thougf.
When it is said that religion from the Vedas can make one be a better christian/muslim/whatever, this can only mean that the Vedas speak of higher truths, with higher clarity. Of course a person can just use them to improve their practice and not let go of their old practices due to attachment or not even considering in the first place, but the best practice would be to embrace the higher truths wholeheartedly. Not to mention it's logically the best course of action: Since X makes Y better, why not just go with X all the way?
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks