Originally Posted by
Believer
Pietro,
Thank you for giving us a Brazilian perspective on ISKCON.
With all his faults, Prabhupad brought the Vedic knowledge to the West. Whether the Westerners continue to embrace it or discard it as the time goes by, depends on the strength of character of the leaders who inherited the movement. Many a times, the message is lost because of the flaws of the messenger, or certain restriction enforced on the adherents. If that happens, it will be your loss, as the Sanatan Dharma will continue to thrive in its place of birth. In the West, ISKCON does not have a wide support even among the Indian community because,
1. It tried to distance itself from Hinduism, for whatever reason, and some negative things were written/said about the leaders of other sampradayes.
2. As Gaudiya Vaishavanism sampradaye grew out of the Bengal area, all the bhajans/aartis composed by their revered gurus are in Bengali language. That limits their popularity with a large majority of the Indians for whom Hindi is the common link language.
3. With decline in their fund-raising capability, they sometimes do indulge in questionable practices.
4. Some more deficiencies (???) unpalatable to an average Hindu.
At the end of the day, we must overlook all the meaningless/petty flaws in every Sanatan Dharma sampradaye and pull together for the greater good of our faith and of the mankind. But many of us cannot avoid the temptation to throw barbs at other sampradayes; not realizing that collectively, we are only hurting ourselves. Weakening any sampradaye only weakens a support pillar of the great Vedic Dharma.
As they say, that is Kala Yuga for you!
Bookmarks