Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    September 2008
    Location
    Sri. Valkalam, Kerala, SI
    Posts
    604
    Rep Power
    977

    Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?


  2. #2
    Join Date
    September 2008
    Location
    Sri. Valkalam, Kerala, SI
    Posts
    604
    Rep Power
    977

    Re: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

    103 points from a well known book entitled "The Taj Mahal is a Temple Palace"


    1. The term Taj Mahal itself never occurs in any Mogul
    court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb's time.

    2. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-Mahal i.e. a
    crown among residences is, therefore, ridiculous.

    3. Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place how
    can the term 'Mahal' i.e. 'mansion', apply to it?

    4. The other popular Islamic explanation is that the term
    'Taj Mahal' derives from 'Mumtaz Mahal'--the lady who
    is supposed to be buried in it. This explanation is itself
    full of absurdities as we shall presently see. It may be
    noted at the outset that the term 'Taj' which ends in a 'j',
    could not have been derived from Mumtaz ending in a'z'.

    5. Moreover, the lady's name was never Mumtaz Mahal but
    Arjum and Banu Begum alias Mum taz-ul-Zamani , as men-
    tioned in Shahjahan's official court chronicle, the Bad-
    shahnama.

    6. Since the term Taj Mahal does not at all occur in Mogul
    records it is absurd to search for any Mogul explanation
    for it. Both its components namely 'Taj' and 'Mahal' are
    of Sanskritic origin. Mahal in Hindu parlance signifies a
    mansion i.e. a grand edifice. Taj is the popular corrup-
    tion of the word 'Tej' meaning splendour. In no Muslim
    country from Afghanistan to Abyssinia, is any edifice
    described as Mahal.

    7. The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the Sanskrit
    term 'Tejo Mahalaya' signifying a Shiva temple. Agresh-
    war Mahadev i.e. the Lord God of Agra was consecrated
    in it.

    8. The famous Hindu treatise on architecture, titled Vis-
    wakarma Vastushastra mentions the 'Tej Linga' amongst
    Shiva Lingas i.e. stone emblems of Lord Shiva, the Hindu
    deity. Such a Teja Linga was consecrated in the Taj
    Mahal hence the term Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya.

    9. Agra city, in which the Taj Mahal is located, is an
    andent centre of Shiva worship. Its orthodox residents
    have through the ages continued the tradition of wor-
    shipping at five Shiva shrines before taking the last meal
    every night especially during the month of Shravan.
    During the last few centuries residents of Agra had to be
    content with worshipping at only four prominent Shiva
    temples viz. Balkeshwar, Prithvinath, Manakameshwar
    and Rajarajeshwar. They had lost track of the fifth
    Shiva deity which their forefathers worshipped. Appa-
    rently the fifth was Agreshwar Mahadev i.e. the Lord
    Great God of Agra consecrated in the Tejo-Mahalaya
    alias Taj Mahal.

    10. The people who dominate the Agra region are Jats.
    Their name for Shiva is Tejaji. The Jat special issue of
    the Illustrated Weekly of India (June 28, 1971) mentions
    that the Jats have Teja Mandirs i.e. Teja temples. This
    is because Teja Linga is one among several names of
    Shiva Lingas mentioned in Hindu architectural texts.
    From this it is apparent that the Taj Mahal is Tejo
    Mahalaya, the Great Abode of Tej'.

    11. A Sanskrit inscription too supports the above conclusion.
    Known as the Bateshwar inscription it is currently pre-
    served in the Lucknow museum. It refers to the raising
    of a "Crystal white Shiva temple so alluring that Lord
    Shiva once enshrined in it decided never to return to
    Mount Kailas--his usual abode". This inscription was
    found within a radius of about 36 miles from the Taj
    Mahal. The inscription is dated 1155 A.D. From this it
    is clear that the Taj Mahal was built at least 500 years
    before Shahjahan.

    12. Shahjahan's own court chronicle, the Badshahnama ad-
    mits (on page 403, Vol. 1) that a grand mansion of unique
    splendour, capped with a dome, (imaarat-e-alishan wa
    gumbaze) was taken from the Jaipur Maharaja Jaisingh
    for Mumtaz's burial.

    13. The plaque put up by the archaeology department outside
    the Taj Mahal describes the edifice as a mausoleum built
    by Shahjahan for his wife Mumtaz Mahal, over 22 years
    from 1631 to 1653. That plaque is a specimen of
    historical bungling. Firstly, the plaque cites no authority
    for its claim. Secondly, the lady's name was Mumtez-ul-
    Zamani and not Mumtaz Mahal. Thirdly, the period of 22
    years is taken from some mumbo jumbo noting by an
    unreliable French visitor Tavernier, to the exclusion of
    all Muslim versions, which is an absurdity.

    14. Prince Aurangzab's letter to his father, emperor Shah-
    jahan, belies the archaeological department's reliance on
    Tavernier. Aurangzeb's letter is recorded in at least two
    chronicles titled 'Aadaab-e-Alamgiri' and
    'Yaadgaarnama'. In that Aurangzeb records in 1652 A.D.
    itself that the buildings in the fancied burial place of
    Mumtaz, were seven-storied and were so old that they
    were all leaking, while the dome had developed a crack on
    the northern side. Aurangzeb, therefore, ordered imme-
    diate repairs to the buildings at his own expense while
    recommending to the emperor that more elaborate re-
    pairs be carried out later. This is proof that during
    Shahjahan's reign itself the Taj complex was so old as to
    need immediate repairs.

    15. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur retains in his secret personal
    custody two orders from Shahjahan dated December 18,
    1633 (bearing modern numbers K.D. 176 and 177) requisi-
    tioning the Taj building complex. That was so blatant a
    usurpation that the then ruler of Jaipur was ashamed to
    make the documents public.

    16. The Rajasthan State Archives at Bikaner preserves three
    other firmans addressed by Shahjahan to Jaipur's ruler
    Jaisingh ordering the latter to supply marble from his
    Makrana quarries, and stone cutters. Jaisingh was
    apparently so enraged at the blatant seizure of the Taj
    Mahal that he refused to oblige Shahjahan by providing
    marble for grafting Koranic engravings and false tombs
    for further desecration of the Taj Mahal. Jaisingh
    looked upon Shahjahan's demand for marble and stone
    cutters, as an insult added to injury.

    17. The three firmans demanding marble were sent to
    Jaisingh within about two years of Mumtaz's death. Had
    Shahjahan really built the Taj Mahal over a period of 22
    years the marble would have been needed only after 15
    or 30 years and not immediately after Mumtaz's death.

    18. Moreover, the three firmans mention neither the Taj
    Mahal, nor Mumtaz, nor the burial. The cost and the
    quantity of stone required also are not mentioned. This
    proves that an insignificant quantity of marble was
    needed just for some superficial tinkering and tampering
    with the Taj Mahal. Even otherwise Shahjahan could
    never hope to build a fabulous Taj Mahal by abject
    dependence for marble on a non-cooperative vassal like
    Jaisingh.

    19. The Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters of the
    Koran but nowhere is there even the slightest or re-
    motest allusion in that Islamic overwriting to Shahjahan's
    authorship of the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder he
    would have said so in so many words before beginning to
    quote the Koran.

    20. That Shahjahan far from building the marble Taj only
    disf igured it with black lettering is mentioned by the
    inscriber Amanat Khan Shirazi himself in an inscription
    on the building.

    21. Well known western authorities on architecture like E. B.
    Havell, Mrs. Kenoyer and Sir W. W. Hunter have gone on
    record to say that the Taj Mahal is built in the Hindu
    temple style. Havell points out that the ground plan of
    the ancient Hindu Chandi Seva temple in Java is identi-
    cal with that of the Taj.

    22. A central dome with cupolas at its four corners is a
    universal feature of Hindu temples.

    23. The four marble pillars at the plinth corners are of the
    Hindu style. They were used as lamp towers during the
    night and as watch towers during the day. Such towers
    serve to demarcate the holy precincts. Hindu wedding
    altars and the altar set up for God Satyanarayan worship
    have pillars raised at the four corners.

    24. The octagonal shape of the Taj Mahal has a special
    Hindu significance because Hindus alone have special
    names for the eight directions, and celestial guards
    assigned to them. The pinnacle points to the heaven
    while the foundation signifies the nether world. Hindu
    forts, cities, palaces, and temples generally have an
    octagonal layout or some octagonal features so that
    together with the pinnacle and the foundation they cover
    all the ten directions in which the king or god holds
    sway, according to Hindu belief.

    25. The Taj Mahal has a trident pinnacle over the dome. A
    full scale figure of that trident pinnacle is inlaid in the
    red stone courtyard to the east of the Taj. The central
    shaft of the trident depicts a Kalash (sacred pot) holding
    two bent mango leaves and a coconut. This is a sacred
    Hindu motif. Identical pinnacles may be seen over Hindu
    and Buddhist temples in the Himalayan region. Tridents
    are also depicted against a red lotus background at the
    apex of the stately marble arched entrances on all four
    sides of the Taj Mahal. People fondly but mistakenly
    believed all these three centuries that the Taj pinnacle
    depicts an Islamic crescent and star or was a lightning
    conductor installed by the British rulers of India. Con-
    trarily the pinnacle is a marvel of Hindu metallurgy
    since the pinnacle made of a non-rusting alloy, is also
    perhaps a lightning deflector. That the replica of the
    pinnacle is drawn in the eastern courtyard is significant
    because the east is of special importance to the Hindus,
    as the direction in which the sun rises. The pinnacle on
    the dome has the word Allah carved on it after capture.
    The pinnacle figure on the ground does not have the word
    Allah.

    26. The two buildings which face the marble Taj from the
    east and west are identical in design, size and shape and
    yet the eastern building is explained away by Islamic
    tradition, as a community hall while the western building
    is claimed to be a mosque. How could buildings meant
    for radically different purposes be identical? This
    proves that the western building was put to use as a
    mosque after seizure of the Taj property by Shahjahan.
    Curiously enough the building being explained away as a
    mosque has no minaret.

    27. A few yards away on the same flank is the Nakkar Khana
    alias drum house which is an intolerable incongruity for
    Islam. The proximity of the drum house indicates that
    the western annex was not originally a mosque. Con-
    trarily a drum house is a necessity in a Hindu temple or
    palace because Hindu chores morning and evening begin
    to the sweet strains of music.

    28. The embossed patterns on the marble exterior of the
    cenotaph chamber wall are foliage of the conch shell
    design and the Hindu letter 'OM'. The octagonally laid
    marble lattices inside the cenotaph chamber depict pink
    lotuses on their top railing. The lotus, the OM and the
    conch shell are sacred motifs associated with Hindu
    deities and temples.

    29. The spot occupied by Mumtaz's cenotaph was formerly
    occupied by the Hindu Teja Linga--a lithic representa-
    tion of Lord Shiva. That emblem may still lie buried in
    the cenotaph for all we know. Around it are three
    perambulatory passages. Perambulation could be done
    around the marble lattice or through the spacious marble
    chambers surrounding the cenotaph chamber, and in the
    open over the marble platform. It is also customary for
    Hindus to have apertures along the perambulatory pas-
    sage, overlooking the deity. Such apertures exist in the
    perambulatories in the Taj Mahal.

    30. The sanctum sanctorum in the Taj Mahal had silver doors
    and gold railings as Hindu temples still have. It also had
    nets of pearl, and gems stuffed in the marble lattices. It
    was the lure of this wealth which made Shahjahan
    commandeer the Taj Mahal from a helpless vassal
    Jaisingh, the then ruler of Jaipur.

    31. Peter Mundy an Englishman who left India within a year
    or two of Mumtaz's death notes having seen a gem-
    studded gold railing around Mumtaz's tomb. Had the Taj
    Mahal been under construction for 22 years a costly gold
    railing would not have been noticed by Peter Mundy
    within a couple of years of Mumtaz's death. Such costly
    fixtures are installed in a building only after the building
    is ready for use. This indicates that Mumtaz's cenotaph
    was grafted in the centre of the gold railings. Subse-
    quently the gold railings, silver doors, nets of pearls,
    gem-fillings etc. were all carted away to Shahjahan's
    treasury. The seizure of the Taj Mahal thus constituted
    an act of high-handed Mogul robbery which occasioned
    big tussle between Shahjahan and Jaisingh.

    32. In the marble flooring around Mumtaz's cenotaph may be
    seen tiny mosaic patches. Those patches indicate the
    spots where the supports for the gold railings were
    embedded in the floor. They indicate a rectangular
    fencing.

    33. Above Mumtaz's cenotaph, hangs a chain by which now
    hangs a lamp. Before capture by Shahjahan the chain
    used to hold a water pitcher from which water used to
    drip on the Shiva Linga.

    34. It is this earlier drip-drop Hindu tradition in the Taj
    Mahal which gave rise to the Islamic myth of Shahjahan's
    love tear dropping on Mumtaz's tomb on a full moon day
    on winter eve.

    35. There are many absurdities in the Shahjahan tear legend.
    Firstly, Shahjahan was no saint capable of post-mortem
    miracles. Secondly, why should only one lone tear drop on
    the cenotaph in 365 days from a proverbially disconso-
    late Shahjahan? Even that tear could be shed by
    Shahjahan's ghost entering the chamber through the
    public entrance to weep his heart out on Mumtaz's
    tombstone itself. Why should Shahjahan's ghost perform
    a precarious circus feat of clambering up a slippery
    marble dome which even an agile monkey won't dare
    attempt, and shed one tear once a year from a height Over
    200 feet?

    The tear is said to drop in the form of dew or rain water,
    at the stroke of the midnight hour through a tiny needle hole
    aperture made by an irate mason's random hammer stroke
    This gives rise to many more absurdities viz. is the liquid the
    secretion of Shahjahan's ghost or dew or rain? Furthermore
    there is no aperture in the dome as is claimed or assumed.
    Had there been any such, rain water would have leaked in too
    and made the interior wet. Moreover, the Taj Mahal has a
    double dome. The concave dome one sees from inside, ends
    like a huge inverted pan on the terrace. The dome one sees
    from the outside rests like a top hat on the inner dome. Inside
    it is a huge chamber about 83 feet high with the convex top of
    the inner dome providing a curious domed floor. Because of
    this double dome arrangement no liquid, including Shahjahan's
    tear can even drop inside the Taj. Even if the upper, dome has
    a chance aperture the drop, if any, will be arrested by the
    inner dome. This is a typical instance of how gullible
    multitudes place quick and easy faith in the most absurd
    concoctions.

    36. Even the hammer-story is a fabrication. Firstly, nobody
    seems to ask why should any mason bear any grudge
    towards Shahjahan when the latter is said to have spent
    liberally and lavishly in cam missioning the mausoleum?
    Secondly, even if a mason bore any grudge he would not
    be permitted access to the emperor to exchange hot
    words with. Even if there were any argument between
    the two it would not be between a Shahjahan standing in
    the garden and the petulant mason on the slippery perch
    like an irate monkey on top of the dome at a perpendi-
    cular height of 243 feet or so. What is more, an angry
    masonts most powerful hammer stroke would not make
    even the slightest dent in the dome because the dome
    has a 13 feet thick wall covered with hard marble.

    The hammer stroke and tear drop stories are a fraudu-
    lent Islamic fabrication based on two facts. One of those we
    have already noted namely that in the Hindu tradition water
    did drip in droplets from a pitcher hung over the Shiva Linga.

    The second fact is that Shahjahan was so stingy by
    nature that he did not want to spend even a cent from his own
    treasury in transferring a captured Taj Mahal into an Islamic
    mausoleum. His troops used to round up workers from Agra
    city and the neighbourhood at sword point or at the crack of a
    whip. Such forced labour was employed for years in pulling
    out Hindu idols, grafting Koranic engravings, and sealing, five
    Of the seven stories of the Taj klahal. Being compelled to
    work for years without wages, the workmen rebelled. A
    haughty Shahjahan punished them by amputating their hands.

    37. But the above gruesome detail has been given a romantic
    twist by fabricators of the Shahjahan legend. They want
    people to believe that Shahjahan maimed the workers
    because they should not build a rival Taj for someone
    else. This facile, disingenious version is based on many
    imponderable details. Firstly, for anybody to conceive a
    rival Taj he should have had as comely and infatuating a
    wife as Mumtaz is believed to have been. Secondly, she
    should have died after the Taj Vlahal was supposed to
    have been completed by Shahjahan. Thirdly, that fancied
    prospective rival should be swayed by tearing envy and
    jealousy. Fourthly, he must be as affluent as a Mogul
    emperor and be an equally irresponsible spendthrift itch-
    ing to squander his millions on a fabulous mausoleum.
    Even if all this fantastic nonsense is conjured up as a
    reality, an angry Shahjahan could still nip the competitive
    impudence of a subject of his by a simple imperial fiat
    prohibiting the budding of a rival Taj.

    A further absurdity is that while on the one hand it is
    contended that Shahjahan was so soft hearted as to weep
    disconsolately over the death of his wife, it is also contended
    In the same breath that he turned fiercely treacherous as soon
    as the wonder mausoleum was complete and ordered the
    maimimg of the master workmen. Would a sovereign be
    gratified and reward the master craftsmen who execute a
    work of art or would he punish them with maiming for all their
    skill and devotion? Such rascality and treachery not attri-
    buted even to a snake is unwittingly attributed to Shahjahan by
    his absentminded admirers.

    38. As one climbs down the stairs to the basement chamber
    in the Taj, believed to house the real grave of Mumta2
    one may take a close look at the walls on either side of
    the first landing. The walls are finished with marble
    slabs of dissimilar sizes. That indicates that ramps or
    stairs branching off at the first landing, to go down to
    the other chambers in the basement have been sealed off
    by Shahjahan haphazardly with dissimilar slabs which
    came handy.

    39. Apart from these stairs there are many others which
    have been sealed by Shahjahan. As one climbs up from
    the red stone courtyard to the marble plinth one may
    notice a square marble slab in front. Stamping one's feet
    on it one gets a hollow sound. Thumping on the
    surrounding slabs does not produce a hollow sound.
    Apparently the square slab hides a man-size entrance to
    a staircase leading to hidden chambers in the marble
    basement. Another steep staircase sealed by Shahjahan
    was discovered when a stone slab on the terrace beyond
    the so-called mosque and octagonal well, was removed
    for investigation when a chance thumping produced a
    hollow sound there. This indicates the extent of Shah-
    jahan's tampering with the Taj and that there is much
    more to see and discover in the Taj, than meets the eye.

    40. The Taj Mahal having originated as a temple palace it
    has several dry, scavenging type toilets which lie un-
    known to the lay visitor, locked and barred. Had it been
    an Islamic mausoleum it should not have had toilets.

    41. Between the so-called mosque and the drum house is a
    multi-storied octagonal well with a flight of stairs
    reaching down to the water level. This is the traditional
    treasury well in Hindu temple palaces. Treasure chests
    used to be kept in the lower apartments while treasury
    personnel had their offices in the upper chambers. The
    circular stairs made it difficult for intruders to reach
    down to the treasure or to escape with it undetected or
    unpursued. In case the premises had to be surrendered to
    a besieging enemy the treasure could be pushed into the
    well to remain hidden from the conqueror and remain
    safe for salvaging if the place was reconquered. Such an
    elaborate multi-storied well is superfluous for a mere
    mausoleum.

    42. Tavernier, a French merchant who happened to visit India
    during Shahjahan's reign has noted in his memoirs that
    Shahjahan "purposely" buried Mumtaz at the "the Taj-i-
    Macan", (i.e. the Taj Mahal) so that the wood may
    admire the burial spot because even foreigners used to
    flock to see the Taj Mahal in Tavernier's time as they do
    now. Those who are misled to believe that the Taj Sahel
    finds no mention before Mumtaz's death, may note
    Tavernier's reference.

    43. Had Shahjahan really built the Taj Mahal as a wonder
    mausoleum, history would have recorded a specific date
    on which she was ceremoniously buried in the Taj Mahal.
    No such date is ever mentioned. This important missing
    detail decisively exposes the falsity of the Shahjahan
    legend.

    44. F.ven the year of Mumtaz's death is unknown. It is
    variously speculated to be 1629, 1630, 1631 or 1632. Had
    she deserved a fabulous burial, as is claimed, the date of
    her death would not have been a matter of speculation.
    In a harem teeming with 5000 women it was difficult to
    keep track of dates of death. Apparently the date of
    Mumtaz's death was so insignificant an event as not to
    merit any special notice. Who would then build a Taj
    Mahal for her burial?

    45. Stories of Shahjahan's exclusive infatuation for \1umtaz
    are concoctions. They have no basis in history nor has
    any book ever been written on their fancied love affair.
    Those stories have been invented as an after-thought to
    make Shahjahan's authorship of the Taj, look plausible.

    46. The cost of the Taj Mahal is nowhere recorded in
    Shahjahan's court papers because Shahjahan never built
    the Taj Vlahal. That is why wild estimates of the cost by
    gullible writers have ranged from four million to 91.7
    million rupees.

    47. Likewise the period of construction has been guessed to
    be anywhere between 10 and 22 years. There would not
    have been any scope for such guesswork had the building
    construction been on record in the court papers.

    48. The designer of the Taj Mahal is also variously men-
    tioned as Essa Effendy, a Persian or Turk or Ahmed
    Mehendis or a Frenchman, Austin de Bordeaux or Geroni-
    mo Veroneo an Italian or Shahjahan himself.

    49. Twenty thousand labourers are supposed to have worked
    for 22 years during Shahjahan's reign in building the Taj
    Mahal. Had this been true, there should have been
    available in Shahjahan's court papers heaps of labour
    muster rolls, daily expenditure sheets, bills and receipts
    for material ordered, and commissioning orders. There
    is not even a scrap of paper of the kind.

    50. It is, therefore, court flatterers, fiction writers and
    senile poets who are responsible for hustling the world
    into believing in Shahjahan's mythical authorship of the
    Taj Mahal.

    51. Descriptions of the garden around the Taj of Shahjahan's
    time mention Ketaki, Jai, Ji, Champa, Maulashree, Har-
    shringar and Bell All these are plants whose flowers or
    leaves are used in the worship of Hindu deities. Bel
    leaves are used exclusively in Shiva worship. A grave-
    yard is planted only with shady trees because the idea of
    using fruit or flower from plants in a cemetery is
    abhorrent to human conscience. The presence of Bel and
    other flower plants in the Taj garden is proof of its having
    been a Shiva temple before seizure by Shahjahan.

    52. Hindu temples are often built on river banks and sea
    beaches. The Taj Mahal is one such built on the bank of
    the Yamuna river--an ideal location for a Shiva temple.

    53. Prophet Mohammad has ordained that the burial spot of
    a Muslim should be inconspicuous and must not be
    marked by even a single tombstone. In flagrant violation
    of this the Taj Mahal has one grave in the basement and
    another in the first floor chamber both ascribed to
    Mumtaz. Those two cenotaphs were in fact erected by
    Shahjahan to bury the two tier Shiva Lingas that were
    consecrated in the Taj Mahal. It is customary for Hindus
    to install two Shiva Lingas one over the other in two
    stories as may be seen in the Mahankaleshwar temple in
    Ujjain and the Somnath temple raised by Ahilyabai in
    Somnath Pattan.

    54. The Taj Mahal has identical entrance arches on all four
    sides. This is a typical Hindu building style known as
    Chaturmukhi i.e. four-faced.

    SO. The Taj Mahal has a reverberating dome. Such a dome is
    an absurdity for a tomb which must ensure peace and
    silence. Contrarily reverberating domes are a necessity
    in Hindu temples because they create an ecstatic din
    multiplying and magnifying the sound of bells, drums and
    pipes accompanying the worship of Hindu deities.

    56. The Taj Mahal dome bears a lotus cap. Original Islamic
    domes have a bald top as is exemplified by the Pakistan
    Embassy domes in Chanakyapuri, New Delhi and the
    domes in Pakistan's newly built capital Islamabad.

    57. The Taj Mahal entrance faces south. Had the Taj been
    an Islamic building it should have faced the west.

    58. A widespread misunderstanding has resulted in mistaking
    the building for the grave. Invading Islam raised graves
    in captured buildings in every country it overran. There-
    fore, hereafter people must learn not to confound the
    building with the grave mounds which are grafts in
    conquered buildings. This is true of the Taj Mahal too.

    59. The Taj Mahal is a seven-storied building. Prince Au-
    rangzeb also mentions this in his letter to Shahjahan.
    The marble edifice comprises four stories including the
    lone, tall circular hall inside the dome on top, and the
    lone chamber in the basement. In between are two
    floors each containing 12 to 15 palatial rooms.

    Below the marble plinth reaching down to the river at the
    rear are two more stories in red stone. They may be seen
    from the river bank. The seventh story must be below the
    ground (river) level since every ancient Hindu budding had a
    subterranian story.

    60. Immediately below the marble plinth on the river flank
    are 22 rooms in red stone with their ventilators all
    walled up by Shahjahan.

    Those rooms made uninhabitable dark by Shahjahan are
    kept locked by the archaeology department. The lay visitor is
    kept in the dark about them. Those 22 rooms still bear ancient
    Hindu paint on their walls and ceilings. On their inner side is a
    nearly 300 ft. long corridor. There are two door frames one at
    either end of the corridor. but those doorways are intriguingly
    sealed with crumbling brick and lime.

    61. Apparently those doorways originally sealed by Shah-
    Jahan have been since unsealed and again walled up
    several times. In 1934 a resident of Delhi took a peep
    inside from an opening in the upper part of the doorway.
    To his dismay he saw a huge hall inside. It contained
    many statues huddled around a central beheaded image
    of Lord Shiva. It could be that in there are Sanskrit
    inscriptions too. All the seven stories of the Taj Mahal
    need to be unsealed and scoured to ascertain what
    evidence they may be hiding in the form of Hindu
    Images, Sanskrit inscriptions, scriptures, coins and uten-
    sils.


    62. Apart from Hindu images hidden in the sealed stories it
    is learnt that Hindu images are also buried in the
    massive walls of the Taj Mahal. Between 1959 and 1962
    when Mr. S. R. Rao was the archeological superinten-
    dent In Agra he happened to notice a long, deep and wide
    crack in a wall Of the central octagonal chamber of the
    Tail When a part of the wall was dismantled to study the
    crack out popped two or three marble images. The
    matter was hushed up and the images were reburied
    where they had been embedded at Shahjahan's behest.
    Confirmation of this has been obtained from several
    sources. It was only when I began my investigation into
    the antecedents of the Taj that I came across the above
    information which had remained a forgotten secret.

    What better proof is needed of the temple origin off the
    Taj Mahal? Its walls and sealed chambers still hide the Hindu
    idols that were consecrated in it before Shahjahan's seizure of
    the Taj Mahal.

    63. Apparently the Taj Mahal as a temple palace seems to
    have had a chequered history. The Taj was perhaps
    desecrated and looted by every Muslim invader from
    Mohammad Ghazni onwards but passing into Hindu hands
    off and on the sanctity of the Taj Mahal as a Shiva
    temple continued to be revived after every Muslim
    onslaught. Shahjahan was the last Muslim to desecrate
    the Taj Mahal alias Tejo Mahalaya.

    64. Vincent Smith records in his book titled "Akbar the Great
    Mogul" that "Babur's turbulent life came to an end in his
    garden palace in Agra" in 1630. That palace was none
    other than the Taj Mahal.

    65. Babur's daughter Gulbadan Begum in her chronicle titled
    Humayun Nama refers to the Taj Mahal as the Mystic
    House.

    66. Babur himself refers to the Taj Mahal in his memoirs as
    a palace captured from Ibrahim Lodi containing a central
    octagonal chamber and having pillars on the four sides.
    All these historical references allude to the Taj Mahal
    100 years before Shahjahan.

    67. The Taj Mahal precincts extend to several hundred yards
    in all directions. Across the river are ruins of the
    annexes of the Taj, the bathing "hats and a jetty for the
    ferry boat. In the Victoria gardens outside covered with
    creepers is a long spur of the ancient outer wall ending
    in an octagonal red stone tower. Such extensive grounds
    all magnificently done up are a superfluity for a grave.

    68. Had the Taj been built specially to bury Mumtaz, in it
    should not have been cluttered with other graves. But
    the Taj premises contain several other graves at least in
    its eastern and southern pavilions.

    69. In the southern flank on either side of the Tajgan gate
    are buried in identical pavilions a queen Sarhandi Begum
    and a maid Satunnisa Khanum. Such parity burial can be
    justified only if the queen has been demoted or the maid
    promoted. But since Shahjahan had commandeered (not
    built) the Taj Mahal he reduced it indiscriminately to a
    general Muslim cemetery as was the habit of all his
    Islamic predecessors, and buried a queen in one vacant
    pavilion and a maid in another identical pavilion.

    70. Shahjahan was married to several other women before and
    after Mumtaz. She, therefore deserved no special
    consideration in having a wonder mausoleum built for
    her.

    71. Mumtaz was also a commoner by birth and so she did not
    qualify for a fairyland burial.

    72. Mumtaz died in Burhanpur which is about six hundred
    miles from Agra. Her grave there is intact. Therefore,
    the cenotaphs raised in two stories of the Taj, in her
    name seem to be fakes hiding the Hindu Shiva emblems.

    73. Shahjahan seems to have simulated Mumtaz's burial in
    Agra to find a pretext to surround the temple palace
    with his fierce and fanatic Islamic troops and remove all
    its costly fixtures to his treasury. This finds confirma-
    tion in the vague noting in the official chronicle, the
    Badshahnama which says that Mumtaz's (exhumed) body
    was brought to Agra from Burhanpur and buried "next
    year". An official chronicle wouldn't use a nebulous
    term unless it is to hide something.

    74. A pertinent consideration is that a Shahjahan who did not
    build any palaces for Mumtaz while she was alive and
    kicking would not build a fabulous mausoleum for a
    corpse which was no longer kicking or clicking.

    75. Another factor is that Mumtaz died within two to three
    years of Shahjahan becoming emperor. Could he amass
    so much superfluous wealth in that short span as to
    squander it on a wonder mausoleum?

    76. While Shahjahan's special attachment to Mumtaz is no-
    where recorded in history his amorous affairs with many
    other ladies from maids to mannequins including his own
    daughter Jahanara find special mention in accounts of
    Shahjahan's reign. Would such a Shahjahan shower his
    hard-earned wealth on Mumtaz's corpse?

    77. Shahjahan was a stingy, usurious monarch. He came to
    the throne murdering all his rivals. He was not, there-
    fore, the doting spendthrift that he is made out to be.

    78. A Shahjahan disconsolate on Mumtaz's death is suddenly
    credited with a resolve to build the Taj. This is a
    psychological incongruity. Grief is a disabling, incapaci-
    tating emotion.

    79. An infatuated Shahjahan is supposed to have raised the
    Taj over a dead Mumtez, but carnal, physical, sexual
    love is again an incapacitating emotion. A womanizer is
    ipso facto incapable of any constructive activity. When
    carnal love becomes uncontrollable the person either
    murders somebody or commits suicide. He cannot raise
    a Taj Mahal. A building like the Taj Mahal invariably
    originates in an enabling emotion like devotion to god, to
    one's mother and mother country or power and glory.

    80. Early in the year 1973 chance digging in the garden
    infront of the Taj revealed another set of fountains
    about six feet below the present fountains. This proved
    two things. Firstly, that the subterranean fountains
    were there before Shahjahan laid the surface fountains.
    And secondly that since those fountains are aligned to
    the Taj that edifice too is of pre-shahjahan origin.
    Apparently the garden and its fountains had sunk from
    annual monsoon flooding and lack of maintenance for
    centuries during Islamic rule.

    81. The stately rooms on the upper floor of the Taj Mahal
    have been stripped of their marble mosaic by Shahjahan
    to obtain matching marble for raising fake tomb stones
    inside the Taj premises at several places. Contrasting
    with the rich, marble finished ground floor rooms the
    stripping of the marble mosaic covering the lower half of
    the walls and flooring of the upper story chambers have
    given those rooms a naked, robbed, look. Since no
    visitors are allowed entry to the upper story this des-
    poilation by Shahjahan has remained a well-guarded
    secret. There is no reason why Shahjahan's loot of the
    upper floor marble should continue to be hidden from the
    public even after two hundred years of termination of
    Mogul rule.

    82. Bernier, a French traveler has recorded that no non-
    Muslim was allowed entry into the secret nether cham-
    bers of the Taj because there were some dazzling costly
    fixtures there. Had those been installed by Shahjahan
    they should have been shown to the public as a matter of
    pride. But since it was commandeered Hindu wealth
    Shahjahan dared not show it to others lest it lead to
    attempts at recapture.

    83. The approach to the Taj Mahal is dotted with hillocks
    raised with earth dug out from foundation trenches. The
    hillocks served as outer defences of the Taj building
    complex. Raising such hillocks from foundation earth, is
    a common Hindu device of hoary origin. Nearby Bharat-
    pur provides a graphic parallel.

    Peter Mundy has recorded that Shahjahan employed
    thousands of labourers to level some of those hillocks.
    This is graphic proof of the Taj Mahal existing before
    Shahjahan.

    84. Tavernier, the French traveller has noted that Shahjahan
    couldn't obtain timber for raising a scaffolding (to in-
    scribe the Koran at various heights). Shahjahan had,
    therefore, to raise a scaffolding of brick. As a result the
    "cost of the scaffolding was more than that of the entire
    work" says Tavernier. This is clear proof that Shahjahan
    did not build the Taj but only inscribed the Koran.

    85. The spiked gates at the various archways in the Taj
    premises, and the moat still seen on the eastern flank
    are defence devices not needed for a mausoleum.

    86. According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica the Taj build-
    ing complex consists of guest rooms, guard rooms and
    stables. These are irrelevant for a mausoleum.

    87. At the backside river bank is a Hindu crematorium, a
    Shiva temple and bathing "hats of ancient origin. Had
    Shahjahan built the Taj Mahal, he would have destroyed
    those Hindu features.

    88. The story that Shahjahan wanted to build a black marble
    Taj across the river, is another motivated myth. The
    ruins dotting the other side of the river are those of
    Hindu structures demolished during Muslim invasions and
    not the plinth of another Taj Mahal. A Shahjahan who did
    not build the white marble Taj would hardly ever think of
    building a black marble Taj. He was so miserly that he
    forced labourers to work gratis even in the superficial
    tampering necessary to make a Hindu temple serve as a
    Muslim tomb.

    89. The marble that Shahjahan used for grafting Koranic
    lettering in the Taj is of a pale white shade while the
    rest of the Taj Mahal is built with marble of a rich
    yellow tint. That disparity is proof of the Koranic
    extracts being a superimposition.

    90. Though imaginative attempts have been made by some
    historians to foist some fictitious name on history as the
    designer of the Taj Mahal others more imaginative have
    credited Shahjahan himself with superb architectural
    proficiency and artistic talent which could easily con-
    ceive and even plan the Taj even in acute bereavement.
    Such people betray gross ignorance of history inasmuch
    as Shahjahan was a cruel tyrant, a great womanizer and
    a drug and drink addict.

    91. Fanciful accounts about Shahjahan commissioning the
    Taj are all confused. Some assert that Shahjahan ordered
    building drawings from all over the world and chose one
    from among them. Others assert that a man at hand was
    ordered to design a mausoleum and his design was approv-
    ed. Had any of those versions been true Shabjahan's
    court papers should have had thousands of drawings
    concerning the Taj but there is not even one drawing.
    This is yet another clinching proof that Shahjahan did not
    commission the Taj.

    92. The Taj Mahal is surrounded by huge ruined mansions
    which indicate that great battles have been waged
    around the Taj several times.

    93. At the southeast corner of the Taj garden is an ancient
    royal cattle house. Cows attached to the Tejo Mahalaya
    temple used to be reared there. A cowshed is an
    incongruity in an Islamic tomb.

    94. On the western flank of the Taj are several stately red
    stone annexes. These are superfluous for a mausoleum.

    95. The entire Taj complex comprises 400 to 500 rooms.
    Residential accommodation on such a stupendous scale is
    unthinkable in a mausoleum.

    96. The neighbouring Tajganj township's massive protective
    wall also encloses the Taj Mahal temple palace complex.
    This is clear indication that the Tejo-Mahalaya temple
    palace was part and parcel of the township. A street of
    that township leads straight into the Taj Mahal. The
    Tajganj gate is aligned in a perfect straight line to the
    octagonal red stone garden gate and the stately entrance
    arch of the marble Taj Mahal. The Tajganj gate besides
    being central to the Taj temple complex, is also put on a
    pedestal. The western gate by which visitors enter the
    Taj complex these days is a comparatively minor gate-
    way. It has become the entry gate for most visitors
    today because the railway station and the bus station are
    on that side.

    97. The Taj Mahal has pleasure pavilions which a tomb would
    never have.

    98. A tiny mirror glass in a gallery of the Red Fort in Agra
    reflects the Taj Mahal. Shahjahan is said to have spent
    the last eight years of his life as a prisoner in that
    gallery peering at the reflected Taj Mahal and sighing in
    the name of Mumtaz. This myth is a blend of many
    falsehoods. Firstly, old Shahjahan was held prisoner by
    his son Aurangzeb in a basement story in the fort and not
    in an open, fashionable upper story. Secondly, that glass
    piece was fixed in the 1930's by Insha Allah Khan, a peon
    of the archeology department, just to illustrate to the
    visitors how in ancient times the entire apartment used
    to scintillate with tiny mirror pieces reflecting the Tejo
    Mahalaya temple a thousand fold. Thirdly, an old
    decrepit Shahjahan with pain in his joints and cataract in
    his eyes, would not spend the day craning his neck at an
    awkward angle to peer into a tiny glass piece with
    bedimmed eyesight when he could as well turn his face
    round and have a full, direct view of the Taj Mahal
    itself. But the general public is so gullible as to gulp all
    such absurd prattle of wily, unscrupulous guides.

    99. That the Taj Mahal dome has hundreds of iron rings
    sticking out of its exterior is a feature rarely noticed.
    These are made to hold Hindu earthen oil lamps for
    temple illumination.

    100. Those putting implicit faith in Shahjahan's authorship of
    the Taj have been imagining Shahjahan-Mumtaz to be a
    soft-hearted romantic pair like Romeo and Juliet. But
    contemporary accounts speak of Shahjahan as a hard
    hearted ruler who was constantly egged on to acts of
    tyranny and cruelty, by Mumtaz.

    101. School and college history books carry the myth that
    Shahjahan's reign was a golden period in which there was
    peace and plenty and that Shahjahan commissioned many
    buildings and patronized literature. This is a pure fabrica-
    tion. Shahjahan did not commission even a single build-
    ing as we have illustrated by a detailed analysis of the
    Taj Mahal legend. Shahjahan had to engage in 48
    military campaigns during a reign of nearly 30 years
    which proves that his was not an era of peace and plenty.

    102. The interior of the dome, rising over Mumtaz's cenotaph'
    has a representation of the Sun drawn in gold. Hindu
    warriors trace their origin to the Sun. For an Islamic
    mausoleum the Sun is redundant.

    103. The Muslim caretakers of the tombs in the Taj Mahal
    used to possess a document which they styled as "Tarikh
    -i-Taj Mahal." Historian H. G. Keene has branded it as
    "a document of doubtful authenticity". Keene was
    uncannily right since we have seen that Shahjahan not
    being the creator of the Taj Mahal any document which
    credits Shahjahan with the Taj Mahal, must be an out-
    right forgery. Even that forged document is reported to
    have been since smuggled out to Pakistan.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    March 2010
    Location
    Bangalore, India.
    Age
    31
    Posts
    208
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

    Woaw. I never thought anyone else had read that.
    I don't know who I am, nor what I am.
    I don't know what I need to know.
    I don't know who you are, nor what you are.
    All I know is that you love me, Oh Sarvathma.
    Lead me on the righteous path, so that I may reach you.

  4. #4

    Re: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

    I'd just like to know if anyone else has some insight into this. I find really interesting.

    ~S

  5. #5
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Age
    63
    Posts
    3,218
    Rep Power
    4728

    Re: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

    Don't allow yourself to be a victim of canards being spread by some of the (militant) Hindu Organisations which have only one thing in mind ... votes & power ... they are not thinking of the common man.

    I don't say that Temples were not destroyed by the Muslims .... it is in their religion. However, why rake up these issues now ? Who are these Muslims of India ? They are none but the Hindus who were for some reasons or the other forced to convert to Islam during the long rule of the Moguls. Moreover, what benefits we Hindus with this animosity and hatred ? Our scriptures and our saints didn't teach us to destroy temples of worship of any religion ... or killing a human being just because he is of some different faith.

    Such discussions can only spread the fire of hatred and it is not good for anyone ... niether Hindus nor Muslims.

    OM
    "Om Namo Bhagvate Vaasudevaye"

  6. Re: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

    Quote Originally Posted by devotee View Post
    ------------
    Which said that, this thread do not say anything this way, we need to Remember Chatrapati Shivaji, Surajmal, Prithviraj Chauhan, Mihir Bhoj etc? They all fought against Islam, and remembering them, supporting them is important.

    Supporting Truth is not Hatred, anti Hindus always hate Hindus, but Hindus need to always know the truth or else anti Hindus will make new fake stories like Aryan Invasion Theory and Hindu word form Islam theory.
    [CENTER][B][FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=7][COLOR=Yellow] ॐ[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B]
    [/CENTER]

  7. #7

    Re: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

    Quote Originally Posted by devotee View Post
    Don't allow yourself to be a victim of canards being spread by some of the (militant) Hindu Organisations which have only one thing in mind ... votes & power ... they are not thinking of the common man.

    I don't say that Temples were not destroyed by the Muslims .... it is in their religion. However, why rake up these issues now ? Who are these Muslims of India ? They are none but the Hindus who were for some reasons or the other forced to convert to Islam during the long rule of the Moguls. Moreover, what benefits we Hindus with this animosity and hatred ? Our scriptures and our saints didn't teach us to destroy temples of worship of any religion ... or killing a human being just because he is of some different faith.

    Such discussions can only spread the fire of hatred and it is not good for anyone ... niether Hindus nor Muslims.

    OM
    So you propose that we sit around and do nothing while our culture and practices are continually subverted by those who rule the world? I guess it makes sense...after all, we Indians have been doing that for 4 millennia, haven't we? So next time someone makes crass remarks about my mutant gods and skin color, or next time some anti-Hindu material is published, influencing disbelief, dissension, and ignorance among the masses, I guess I will sit down and smile while the mlecchas destroy us!

  8. Re: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
    So you propose that we sit around and do nothing while our culture and practices are continually subverted by those who rule the world? I guess it makes sense...after all, we Indians have been doing that for 4 millennia, haven't we? So next time someone makes crass remarks about my mutant gods and skin color, or next time some anti-Hindu material is published, influencing disbelief, dissension, and ignorance among the masses, I guess I will sit down and smile while the mlecchas destroy us!
    We need Another Chatrapati Shivaji, Surajmal, Mihirbhoj, Rajraj Chol, Shashank, but not Jaichand
    [CENTER][B][FONT=Arial Black][SIZE=7][COLOR=Yellow] ॐ[/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B]
    [/CENTER]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    September 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    70
    Posts
    7,191
    Rep Power
    5038

    Re: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

    Quote Originally Posted by Shanti View Post
    I'd just like to know if anyone else has some insight into this. I find really interesting.

    ~S
    Vannakkam Shanti: I am not sure when this debate first started, but I know its been a long time. If you browse the net, there is a massive amount of information, discussion, argument etc. on the topic.

    I have no personal insight whatsoever. Then again the Taj would be the last place I would ever visit in India. As a tourist attraction, I believe it is highly overrated. But that's just me, because I'm not the tourist type.

    Aum Namasivaya

  10. #10
    Join Date
    September 2010
    Posts
    1,064
    Rep Power
    1014

    Re: Was TAJ MAHAL a temple called TEJO MAHALAYA?

    You know what is funny? I was waiting at the bus station and at the LCD panel showing varieties there suddenly appears the Taj Mahal, I thought: "Oh, ok, they're gonna say that old romantic story about it..." but the legend said: "Taj Mahal was a Shiva Temple". I was surprised!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •