Vannakkam Believer: I'll try to discuss some of your points. I reiterate that your previous post read way too far between the lines insinuating I was reacting emotionally. But hey that's your right. Perhaps there were some unintentional suggestions unknown to me in the words.
Regarding 'Indian culture' and my not knowing it was just another way of stating its vastness. I think its more vast than European culture is, and don't believe a Spanish person would want a Dutch person speaking for them in India or in North America. Sure there would be a lot in common, but also a lot of differences. Now my familiar version of 'Indian culture' is actually Sri Lankan Tamil culture. Here in my city I have attended various functions by various cultural entities from India. I've been to the Bengali Association's celebration of Durga Puja that coincides with Navaratri. I've been to a fairly strict Smarta but North Indian temple. I've attended functions by Tamil Cultural Association, Kannada Association of Alberta, Telegu Association, a Gujarati Association picnic, observed Sikh parade, gone to a Hindu 'Kerala group' function, a Malayalee wedding dominated by the Malayalee Christians here. Yet again I attended an awards program sponsored by the Council of Indian Societies. I've also touched bases with people from the local Fijian Sanatan Society, the Caribbean Hindu Association, etc.
So yes I have indeed seen some 'Indian Culture' but its a word that is misunderstood here in the west because people don't tend to explain the vastness such as I just did. I think its important, especially for westerners, to have a sense of this complexity. One can hardly lay claim to knowing much 'Indian culture' if they happen to spend a week in Goa on the beaches where Europeans flock.
Even in China there are some 25 ethnic minorities with populations over 100 000. Most people just refer to them as 'Chinese' , which quite likely an insult to the people within those cultures.
Your sense that western 'non-culture' is still vaguely attached to Christianity is only partially true. It holds for some. Still there are many who marry via the 'justice of the peace' method just for legal reasons, as well as many who don't marry at all. Same thing with funerals. Often a Christian minister is asked to perform a marriage because he or she is just handier than finding a marriage commissioner, or they do it for free as a friend might. Once again there is huge variety.
Besides this, the US and Canada vary quite a lot. I notice it each time I cross the border. Various states vary as well. Utah and Hawaii are excellent examples as states that stand out. A good linguist can often tell which state an American is from merely by the accent.
As far as your last bit about reading positivity, I do that, but I would humbly request the same. It must be indeed frustrating to come on here and see some of the viciousness put forth by certain esteemed members.
You and I don't need to add to that flow.
Let's not forget the OP either, which was basically saying some western Hindus have an overly positive view of India. That happened to me as well. I had some misconceptions. So here is a question for you and others regarding the East/West divide. Which would be easier, moving to India, or moving from India regarding culture shock. I'll hold my view back for a moment.
Aum Namasivaya
Bookmarks