Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Quantum Mechanics

  1. #1

    Quantum Mechanics

    I saw an interesting video from BBC on What is reality, a documentary which tries to put different scientific perspectives likes Quantum physics inorder to explain What is reality

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cDiX...eature=related

    During this program, they talk about the double slit experiment of light particle being subjected to travel through a double slit.They observed that a particle can be at two places at the same time

    Is there anywhere in our scriptures that talk about a thing can be a two places at the same point of time?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    November 2010
    Posts
    1,278
    Rep Power
    1636

    Re: Quantum Mechanics

    Quote Originally Posted by The Occult View Post
    Is there anywhere in our scriptures that talk about a thing can be a two places at the same point of time?


    God himself is not only at TWO places at the same point in time...but he is EVERYWHERE! No?

    Bhakta Prahlad told his father Hiranyakashupu..."God is there in the smallest specks of dust as also in the largest of pillars!"

    But seriously, it will be difficult to try to fit every scientific theory exactly back to the Vedas. The scriptures are not scientific treatises, you know.

    Edited to Add: I am sure if a particle can have a speed faster than that of light, all believers of all types [Hindus, Christians, Muslims, etc.] will try to find that within their holy books. If 3 * 10^8 m/s IS the fastest a thing can travel at, the same folks will try and retrofit some OTHER verse from their scripture to suit it.

  3. #3

    Re: Quantum Mechanics

    Quite true, on the other hand, if there is something that can travel faster than lighter it can go back in time!!!!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    December 2007
    Age
    57
    Posts
    3,210
    Rep Power
    4713

    Re: Quantum Mechanics

    Namaste Occult,

    Quote Originally Posted by The Occult View Post
    I saw an interesting video from BBC on What is reality, a documentary which tries to put different scientific perspectives likes Quantum physics inorder to explain What is reality

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cDiX...eature=related

    During this program, they talk about the double slit experiment of light particle being subjected to travel through a double slit.They observed that a particle can be at two places at the same time

    Is there anywhere in our scriptures that talk about a thing can be a two places at the same point of time?
    I didn't have time to see the video and my comments are purely on the basis of what you have asked. Let's analyse the example and inference drawn from it a little further :

    1. If a particle is really one, how can it be at two different places ? This can "happen" only when the two points are actually only one point. That means, the perception of distance/separation is nothing but an illusion.

    2. If particle is perceived at two different places simultaneously, that would also mean that one particle can give a perception of being more than one. That means, the true nature of the particle has inherent nature of creating an illusion of multitude.

    3. The above two inferences leads us to draw conclusion that if one particle can be perceived at two different places ... it can also be seen at more than two places if the experiment is slightly different ... that concludes that it can be present simultaneously at all points under experiment. Therefore, One reality alone is what is perceived at all different points.

    This is what ADVAITA VEDANTA says.

    OM
    "Om Namo Bhagvate Vaasudevaye"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    September 2006
    Age
    65
    Posts
    7,705
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Quantum Mechanics

    hari o
    ~~~~~~

    namast

    Quote Originally Posted by devotee View Post
    1. If a particle is really one, how can it be at two different places ?.
    OM
    Light functions as both a particle and a wave, depending on how the experiment is conducted and when observations are made. People with more knowledge may wish to comment.

    praām
    यतस्त्वं शिवसमोऽसि
    yatastvaṁ śivasamo'si
    because you are identical with śiva

    _

  6. #6

    Re: Quantum Mechanics

    Light function both as particle or wave but cannot be both at the same time but here, when there is no measurement device(here its a detector)it acts as both while when there is measurement device, there is just particle behavior

  7. #7

    Re: Quantum Mechanics

    Namast All

    Very nice observation Devotee, an interesting take on perspective.

    Waves and particles, light may be both or neither. These are models in our minds eye to help us perceive the non-perceivable. Same as DNA which incidentally depends on the very model we are discussing for its structure (another fictitious mathematical form, which incidentally happens to mimics the reality that it was drawn from; we can say that the model already exists in a multitude of forms that we just had to see one that works and speak it).

    Light was assumed to be a wave by Newton, who observed that white light could be split into its coloured composites by the use of a prism and the wisdom that; light of differing wave lengths, would refract (bending on entry and exit) at a different angle dependant on the wavelength.

    Now the theory of the electro magnetic spectrum says that light must be a particle, or a packet of energy.

    Now things start to become interesting if you make a laser, lasers are light of a very specific wavelength (thus the colour) bounced back and forth between mirrors in a sort of "dressing" tunnel which makes them come out of the end in a straight line rather than scattered, as with a bulb. or a more omni directional light source. It is this which makes a lasers spot stay so small over a distance. Now by tuning down the laser progressively we can see that the power, which is related to the wavelength can not drop, if it did the laser would change colour. so for the light intensity to drop less light must be sent, this happens in packets, like packets of water still containing the wave motion of the sea.
    So if we examine the light it eventually starts to flash, but remains the same wave length. by putting a photographic plate in front of the laser, if for example it has been reduced to one flash per second and we leave the plate for 5 seconds there are 5 dots on the plate, each having travelled separately between the laser and the plate. now with one small slit in a card in between the two objects we get the stripe with a penumbrae. If two are cut we get the multi striped wave effect; Highs + highs, make super highs; lows + highs, cancel; low + lows, make super lows.

    The curiosity being that when left flashing, with the laser emitting one electron (so our model says) at a time the interference happens as if all electrons travelled at once. The drops of water maintain the exact same wave pattern as the sea relating to its physical surroundings (the slits). How does one single electron know whether it is to behave as if there are one or two slits?

    It has been said that cats can see a single electron from a laser, we of course cannot perceive such a small quantity of light, with our relatively crude eyes.

    The more that we know of the precise position of the electron the less we know of the wave function. The wave function being the part that makes the interference pattern in the quantum slit experiment described above.

    Extra dimensions is one of the current possible explanations for this.

    It is also worth noting that time is said to stop when we travel at light speed.

    Another interesting thing about electrons is their spin.

    Two electrons may be linked through space over distance as an electron pair; when they are separated from an atom together; both have a measurable value that we call "spin" which for an electron is either +1/2 or -1/2. Imagine the little ball spinning. This value is decided for neither until it is observed in one, at which time it becomes fixed in the other.

    If we separate an electron pair leaving one on Earth and we send the other to the Moon. If the one on earth becomes +1/2 on being observed, the other becomes -1/2 instantly. The strange thing is that if you observe one that has already been observed you can tell that it has already been looked at. So you know instantly that the electron on the moon has been observed. It is as if they start spinning when touched.

    Our entire Chemistry model and also that of DNA is dependant on electrons being the glue that holds things to together, makes them fit.
    It is interesting to note that most chemists and biologists are ignorant of these concepts; believing that it is the domain of Physicists!

    Fascinating and very strange!

    I am no expert on this; just fascinated by it. So please take lightly.

    Did you know that the chemical base of DNA is phosphorus? that's right, light emitting!!!



    praNAma

    mana

  8. #8

    Re: Quantum Mechanics

    Whether chemists and biologists like it or not,everything boils down to physics.All the processes,interactions of neurons,chemical reactions are all caused by interaction of atoms,electrons,and subatomic particles and if there is anything that involves physical interactions, we will have physics into it.On a macroscopic level, you may be talking about different fields such a physics chemistry,biology,computer science but deep down they are all physical processes in different scales.So if they think whatever that is said in physics doesnt hold good for their domain,they are very ignorant and even dogmatic.

    While physicists are slowly moving close to metaphysicsts, we have chemists and biologists being hardcore materialists

  9. #9
    Join Date
    January 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    741
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Quantum Mechanics

    This is a very interesting topic and one of the best books I've read on this is "Mysticism and the New Physics" by Michael Talbot. Fritjof Capra's "The Tao of Physics" is also an excellent read. Amit Goswami's "The Self Aware Universe" is supposed to be a good read as well; I haven't read it yet.

    As far as the Vedas containing the same principles, I tend to agree with Wundermonk's assertion; in retrospect, everything seems to be "there" (because we want it to be so). Of course, the fundamental difference is that the rSIs of India were actually able to experience these principles; being at several places at once, traveling very large distances in extremely short times (through consciousness), and other seemingly miraculous things.

    The only "issue" with that is that it's not replicable or repeatable in a "lab". Those experiences arise from transcending the material plane, not by running in faster and faster circles in it (particle collider anyone? )!

    This vertical knowledge is what is called pratyakSA or direct perception. Patanjali's Yoga Sutras contain some fascinating information about these physics-defying practices.

    One of the interesting parallels in Vedanta to QM is the nAda/bindu duality which refers to consciousness but in QM, it's wave/particle duality.

    My thoughts are that creation and all matter is just "bunched up" consciousness that gives rise to the illusion of separation. In actuality, the "null-field" is just 'twisted' or 'bunched up' to form the matter/anti-matter pair and results in distinct particles and apparent boundaries.

    The rSIs of India were able to PERCEIVE this reality through experience while the modern scientists, especially physicists, are trying to explain it in an objective language (mathematics). However, the key distinction is that scientists will always be operating on this plane of material existence and thus cannot pierce the thick veil of illusion (Maya) but the rSIs, through intense penance, were able to pierce that barrier like a rock through water.

  10. #10

    Re: Quantum Mechanics

    Namasté The Occult

    Quite right, there is a world of difference between, memorising something and knowing it. As the tree grows, I think that we forget in what it is based. prANa and not prakRti.

    praNAma

    mana

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mr. Hawking's view
    By yajvan in forum Science and Religion
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 10 November 2010, 07:01 PM
  2. Quantum Entanglement
    By SethDrebitko in forum Science and Religion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 30 July 2010, 12:18 PM
  3. Einstein, science, quantum physics and Hindu phylosophies and advaitha.
    By upsydownyupsy mv ss in forum Science and Religion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 23 July 2010, 02:06 AM
  4. Entangled Photons ?
    By yajvan in forum Science and Religion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 28 May 2010, 01:14 AM
  5. The interconnectedness of everything...
    By yajvan in forum Vishishtadvaita
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 19 February 2007, 12:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •