"Everything is he, he is for Everyone, So to whom we can say.... is worse, As there is nothing other than Him." -Guru Nanak.
"Everything is he, he is for Everyone, So to whom we can say.... is worse, As there is nothing other than Him." -Guru Nanak.
OK
May bebut i feel grateful in , every sesion of life i feel Baghavati always with me (whatever happened in my life).
But i think.. Yes! human life is very short, but not that short -- that one could say: I feel, or I will feel, greatful in every session of life, due to _____ or whatever.
Who knows which type of conditions we have to face in our coming life.
Anyways... very nice to meet you Shian ji.
_/\_Jasdir.
"Everything is he, he is for Everyone, So to whom we can say.... is worse, As there is nothing other than Him." -Guru Nanak.
Namasté jasdir
I should be interested to hear your thoughts also jasdir.
If I may be so bold; It is the attachment to the fruit of action which creates friction within our minds, Action free from attachment has no disturbing affect.
Fear of the result of action may be said to be caused by subconscious knowledge of latent desires. The continued existence of the ego.
The effect of the guna is never completely void, yet to be awear of their movement, to see it from a distance allows one to auto compensate for their effect; rather like gimbels on a ships compass.
praNAma
mana
_/\_ Namaste
Its Ok Mana ji, Everybody needs peace of mind -- but.. what forces us to create these attachments? and what helps us to vanish these attachments ? tell me.. ?If I may be so bold; It is the attachment to the fruit of action which creates friction within our minds, Action free from attachment has no disturbing affect.
_/\_Jasdir.
"Everything is he, he is for Everyone, So to whom we can say.... is worse, As there is nothing other than Him." -Guru Nanak.
Namasté jasdir
The notion of a force is somewhat misleading, we are impelled by Karma rather than forced, this is why the notion its self is so subtle and illusive. Force is which the ego perceives and does, the self is impelled by the field. How ever once we realise this, we may become compelled, still the same ego effect.
For example magnatisme, it is not a force unless named as such, the notion of which is misleading. The magnetic field just is that. Geometric, a landscape, within which all things interact simultaneously; neutral/+/-.
The initial 3 dimensions to make the Geometry of a landscape from which other effects may then emerge.
Satva, Rajas, Tamas.
These three guna make prakRit, within these three axis; what is the coefficient of friction? How does this effect movement?
Do body's attract?
I would stipulate that Rajas attracts Tamas and vis versa, that Satva in neutrality breaks the bonds of attachment.
Ok, thought process and musing over ...
Rajas attracts Tamas, and Tamas Rajas. The neutrality of Satva, breaks these bonds. How ever if we are in a state of predominant Rajas or Tamas, we may need to move through either Tamas or Rajas to find neutrality.
Satva facilitates this movement; reducing friction, reducing heat.
We all search for stability within this field. That; to my minds eye, explains the desires which we create, in order to help us evolve; some times revolve ...
praNAma
mana
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks