Re: Indirectly Demeaning Article
There is not point being offended based on real facts. The article also carefully avoids "hindu" reference and calls it tribal superstition. Most hindutva activities will feel a sigh of relief at this separation of tribalism from hinduism with relation to such incidents. But at all other times, we would hate to admit a separate existence of any tribal religion.
Anyway, fact is a fact. It is also clear this is a rare incident, it happens now and then, but generally done by derainged superstitious people. Similar stuff happens everywhere in the world, only the superstition may be in a different form.
But also makes a point how hindus need to fight against superstition. Human sacrifice is attested in both vedic and tantric scriptures, so we need to take a proper stand on why we are against them instead of wriggling around.
What is Here, is Elsewhere. What is not Here, is Nowhere.
Bookmarks