Re: Is there One God worshipped with many forms and names or are there many ?
Originally Posted by
Omkara
A brilliant exposition! No doubt,the devas are different from Brahman, and this is clearly brought out in shruti.Very well done!
But I have been wanting to raise these objectio s for some time but have not had the time to do it-
Which word do you translate as 'gained' or 'obtained' ?
vidé hi- Knowing this
rudró - Rudra Deva
rudríyam mahitváM - Rudra-strength or Rudra glory
There is no word meaning 'gained' or 'obtained' in the sentence.
This is actually Griffith's translation, and the "obtained" part appears to be implied. That being said, I have questioned it some since having posted it months ago, but I never got around to resolving my doubt about it since.
Since Shaivism does not accept the Bhagavad Gita, this should not matter to me, but as a matter of academic interest, this interpretation seems to be wrong.
11.15 Pashyaami devaamstava deva dehe Sarvaamstathaa bhootavisheshasanghaan Brahmaanameesham kamalaasanastha- Mrisheemshcha sarvaanuragaamshcha divyaan
Note that eesham occurs between kamalaasanastha and brahmaanam.Kamalaasanastha obviously means seated on a lotus.Thus eesham must be taken as meaning 'Lord' or 'Ruler' and is an adjective applied to Brahma.
The order wouldn't be that conclusive in a Sanskrit shloka. Isha could theoretically be adjectival in this construction, but could just as easily be a substantive as part of a dvandva compound. Almost every translation I have seen to date interprets it to mean Shiva in this context.
Philosoraptor
"Wise men speak because they have something to say. Fools speak because they have to say something." - Plato
Bookmarks